Search

Objective To compare the composite neonatal and maternal adverse outcomes among low-risk pregnancies with versus without chorioamnionitis. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study using U.S. Vital Statistics Data. The study population was restricted to full term, low-risk, singleton pregnancies. Pregnancies were categorized into those affected and unaffected by chorioamnionitis. The primary outcome was composite neonatal adverse outcome and the secondary outcome was composite maternal adverse outcome. Multivariable Poisson regression models with robust error variance were used to examine the factors associated with chorioamnionitis and to evaluate the association between chorioamnionitis and adverse outcomes [using adjusted relative risk (aRR) and 95% confidence interval (CI)]. Results Of 19.7 million live births, 59.4% met inclusion criteria; among them, 1.7% were complicated by chorioamnionitis. The risk of composite neonatal adverse outcome was higher in newborns delivered by women with chorioamnionitis (aRR = 3.40; 95% CI = 3.30–3.49). Compared to women without chorioamnionitis, those with chorioamnionitis had a higher risk of composite maternal adverse outcome (aRR = 2.42; 95% CI = 2.31–2.55). Infant mortality was also higher in affected pregnancies (aRR = 1.23; 95% CI = 1.09–1.38). Conclusion Among low-risk pregnancies, chorioamnionitis is associated with a higher risk of composite neonatal and maternal adverse outcomes. Infant death is also increased. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction To determine the impact of route of delivery on maternal outcomes among individuals who deliver preterm (before 37 weeks). Materials and methods This was a population-based retrospective cohort study using the U.S. vital statistics datasets on Period Linked Birth-Infant Death Data from 2014 to 2018. The study population was restricted to live births from women with non-anomalous singletons who delivered at 24–36 weeks of gestation. The main explanatory variable for this study was route of delivery, which was categorized as: (i) vaginal delivery, (ii) cesarean delivery with labor, and (iii) cesarean delivery without labor. The primary outcome was composite maternal adverse outcome, which encompassed any of the following: admission to the intensive care unit, maternal blood transfusion, uterine rupture, or unplanned hysterectomy. The results were presented as adjusted relative risk (aRR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Over the study period 1,440,510 live births met the inclusion criteria, and the overall composite maternal adverse outcome was 14.38 per 1,000 live births. After multivariable adjustment, compared to women who underwent a vaginal delivery, the risk of composite maternal adverse outcome was higher in women who had a cesarean delivery with labor (aRR 3.70; 95% CI 3.52–3.90) and those who had a cesarean delivery without labor (aRR 4.79; 95% CI 4.59–4.98). Conclusion With preterm birth, cesarean delivery without labor has higher rate of composite maternal morbidity than cesarean during labor or vaginal delivery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To compare the composite neonatal and maternal adverse outcomes among women with diabetes who labor and deliver at 37–41 weeks at distinct time shifts. Methods This population-based retrospective cohort study using the US Vital Statistics dataset on Period Linked Birth-Infant Death Data from 2013–2017. The study population was restricted to non-anomalous singleton live births from women with pregestational or gestational diabetes, who labored and delivered at 37 0/7 to 41 6/7 weeks of gestation. The time of delivery was categorized as the first shift (7:00–15:00), the second shift (15:00–23:00), and the third shift (23:00–7:00). The primary outcome was a composite neonatal adverse outcome; the secondary outcome was a composite maternal adverse outcome. Multivariable Poisson regression models were used to estimate the association between the time of delivery and adverse outcomes (using adjusted relative risk [aRR] and 95% CI). Results Of 19.8 million live births during the study period, 3.3% (643,610) met the study inclusion criteria. The overall rate of composite neonatal and maternal adverse outcomes were 9.62 and 3.63 per 1000 live births, respectively. Multivariable adjusted regression analysis showed that, compared to newborns delivered at the first shift, the risk of composite neonatal adverse outcome was modestly but significantly higher (aRR 1.19, 95% CI 1.12–1.27) in the third shift (23:00–7:00). There was no significant difference in the risk of composite maternal adverse outcomes between time shifts. In the sensitivity analysis stratified by the day of the week (weekday vs weekend), the results were consistent with the primary analyses. Conclusion Among term pregnancies complicated by diabetes, compared with delivery at 7:00–15:00, the risk of a composite neonatal adverse outcome is marginally but significantly higher if delivery occurs at the third shift (23:00–7:00). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: A potential manner to lower the morbidity with the hypertensive disoreders of pregancy is to explore the time of day of delivery.Objective: To compare composite neonatal adverse outcomes among term women with hypertensive disorders.Methods: This population-based cohort study used the U.S. vital statistics dataset from 2013 to 2017. Time of delivery was categorized into three shifts. The primary outcome was composite neonatal adverse outcome..Results: Compared to neonates delivered at the first shift, the risk of composite neonatal adverse outcome was higher at the third shift (aRR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.13-1.25).Conclusion: the risk of composite neonatal adverse outcome is higher if the delivery occurs at the third (23:00-7:00) shift. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this work is to compare the rate of spontaneous preterm birth and associated neonatal morbidity among low-risk pregnancies conceived spontaneously versus pregnancies conceived using infertility medications/intrauterine insemination (IFM/IUI). This population-based retrospective cohort study utilized the US Vital Statistics data set from 2015 to 2019. Low-risk pregnancies, resulting in a live birth, of individuals who conceived either spontaneously or with the assistance of IFM/IUI were examined. The primary measured outcome was the rate of spontaneous preterm delivery, defined as delivery before 37 weeks' gestation without induction of labor. Of the 19,382,574 deliveries during the study period, 7,876,515 (40.6%) met the inclusion criteria. While 7,843,328 (99.6%) conceived spontaneously, 33,187 (0.4%) conceived using IFM/IUI. The rate of spontaneous preterm delivery was significantly higher for patients who conceived using IFM/IUI (71.0 per 1,000 live births) compared to patients who conceived spontaneously (60.3 per 1,000 live births; adjusted relative risk, 1.40; 95% confidence interval, 1.35–1.46). While the rate of spontaneous preterm births and associated composite of neonatal adverse outcomes are significantly higher in pregnancies conceived using IFM/IUI than spontaneous conception, the mortality is similar. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]