Search

This article describes a nurse-run clinic for low-income individuals or individuals experiencing homelessness. We conducted a quality improvement project using data from 111 individuals over 194 visits. Thirty-seven percent of patients had difficulty managing their health and 22% reported being in an active health crisis. The visits resulted in patients leaving with their visit goal being met (86%), and 96% of nonemergent cases being diverted from the emergency room. The nurse-run clinic provided access to care and served as a safety net for a vulnerable population, providing support for this clinic model with this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Offenders with severe personality pathology are at significantly increased risk of serious and violent offending. In England and Wales, offenders who are likely to meet criteria for a diagnosis of personality disorder are managed within a network of ‘Offender Personality Disorder Pathway’ services. We conducted a retrospective cohort study over 6 years, using linked routine datasets, to examine the effectiveness of these services on male offenders (n = 28,321). We compared the outcomes of those who received a simple case formulation and had not been referred to Pathway services (the ‘Comparison group’), with a group of offenders who had received a complex case formulation and been referred to Pathway services (the ‘Treatment group’). Over time, significant improvements occurred in re-offending risk scores, and lower rates of behavioural disturbance among both Treatment and Comparison groups of offenders. However, no statistically significant differences were detected in the rates of improvement between Treatment and Comparison groups. Offending rates in both groups significantly increased over time, although there was no significant difference in the increase in offending rates between the Treatment and Comparison groups. Currently, there is no statistical evidence that the Pathway is associated with changes in offender behaviour. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Traditionally, classical test theory (CTT) has been used for instrument development and various methods have since been proposed for reducing outcome measures to shorter versions. These reduction methods have not previously been compared in mental or physical health. Aim: To identify and compare the various methods used to develop brief versions of outcome measures from existing measures in mental health. Method: A systematic review of the literature in Embase, Medline, PsychInfo and from a grey literature was done. Search strategies were developed in each database to identify all relevant literature based on the inclusion criteria. Each paper identified was briefly described and then assessed using a bespoke assessment checklist developed by the authors. Methods for reducing outcome measures found across all studies were compared. Results: Ten papers were identified. Five methods were used for scale reduction: Rasch analysis (RA), exploratory factor analysis (EFA), graded response models (GRMs), all-subset regression, and regression. RA was the most widely used process. Conclusion: The Rasch model (RM) is the only model where "'specific objectivity"' is a defining property of the model. This property is necessary for constructing scales in line with the fundamental principles of measurement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Personality-disordered offenders are difficult individuals to manage, and knowledge about effective treatment is sparse. In the UK, novel forensic psychiatric services were recently established for the treatment of offenders with personality disorder. In this paper we report the clinical and economic findings from a 2-year follow-up of a cohort of service users recruited from these services. Baseline information on developmental, clinical and offending histories was obtained from case records. Case records were checked at 6 and 24 months for new episodes of self-harm, violence, alcohol and substance use, and offending behaviour. Ratings of social functioning and therapeutic alliance were obtained from service users at baseline, 6 and 24 months. Fifty-six percent of service users were still engaged with the services at 24-month follow-up. Service users involved in the greatest number of behavioural incidents had greater impairment in baseline social functioning and lower IQ scores. There was no significant change in either therapeutic alliance or social functioning at 6 or 24 months. The economic analysis showed that although the services were predominantly run by the Health Service, there were considerable economic burdens shared by other service providers. Treatment costs at six-month follow-up were also significantly higher. Implications are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Little is known about the long-term economic consequences of child and adolescent mental health problems, despite concerns that costs in later life may be significant. Aims: To evaluate current and lifetime costs of young adults who deliberately poisoned themselves in childhood. Method: Prospective cohort study of 129 young adults (mean age 21) who as teenagers had taken part in a randomized trial following deliberate self-poisoning. Lifetime and current costs of public sector services were calculated and compared to those of a matched general population control group. Results: The self-poisoning group incurred significantly greater lifetime costs than the controls. They used more service-provided accommodation, special education and hospital services, incurred greater criminal justice costs and received more social security benefits. Higher costs in the self-poisoning group were significantly associated with conduct disorder, hopelessness, previous suicide attempts, being male and being in care prior to the self-poisoning event. Conclusions: Child and adolescent mental health problems predict significant costs compared to general population controls. This study provides indications of those groups of young people who incur high costs and for whom early intervention should be considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The dangerous severe personality disorder (DSPD) programme in England provides high security services for offenders with a personality disorder who have a high risk of re-offending. The cost and economic value of the programme is unknown. The aims of this study were to examine patterns in the service use of prisoners in assessment, to evaluate the cost and outcomes of prisoners in DSPD assessment compared to controls, and to identify the clinical and personal characteristics of prisoners with high costs. Individual-level service use data were collected from prisoner files and individual total costs estimated. Prisoners in DSPD assessment had contact with a variety of professionals and group activities. The DSPD group cost £3,500 more on average than those in the control prisons over six months (£25,150 vs. £21,963; p = .094). There were no significant differences in outcome, although there was a consistent trend for the DSPD assessment group to have worse outcomes than controls. In a cost-function analysis, social functioning had a positive impact on cost and psychopathy had a negative impact on cost. Given the substantially higher costs and observed deterioration in outcome among those in assessment compared to those who remain in a high security prison, the additional benefit of assessment is unclear and needs further exploration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Randomised controlled trials are difficult to carry out in high security prisons and very few have succeeded. We describe here a randomised controlled trial of early versus late assessment for the pilot phase of the new DSPD programme for dangerous and severe personality disorder, which assessed prisoners (n = 75) at baseline, then six months, and then one year after randomisation. The trial enjoyed 100% success in getting records and obtained useful qualitative data that helped to explain the findings, but the trial was compromised by repeated protocol violations on grounds that were seldom acknowledged openly but which we conclude were primarily due to ignorance of the purpose of such trials. This led to such contamination of the two arms of the trial that no clear conclusions could be drawn from the trial itself, except that relative costs showed expected differences. However, the trial also showed that the assessment programme was associated with better quality of life in terms of social relationships (p = .03), with an increase in aggression (p = .01), and with worse social functioning in those with less severe personality disorder (p < .01), with the qualitative data suggesting that frustration and unfulfilled expectations lay behind these findings. Suggestions are made about revisions to the assessment process and the changes necessary for successful trials to be mounted in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents the authors' response to the comment on their article about the assessment and treatment programme for dangerous and severe personality disorders (DSPD). According to the authors, the paper only focused on the combined qualitative and quantitative work linked to the randomized controlled trial of assessment. It does not address many of the other issues in the report published by the Home Office in Great Britain. The authors agreed that the studies lack accurate evidence for most of the interventions used in the programme. They argued that such studies are important as the preliminary stages of complex interventions.

Discusses effects of supervised play in a hospital waiting room of an outpatient neurology clinic. Factors that cause anxieties to hospitalized children and their families; Hoffman and Futterman's study of waiting room interventions; Less anxious behavior to children and adults accompanying them when supervised play is available.