Search

Transition from teacher to principal involves both a technocratic response based on 'yearning for certainty' that requisite leadership skills will be learned, and a critically-reflexive approach to adopting a new professional identity (Crow and Møller 2017. "Professional Identities of School Leaders across International Contexts: An Introduction and Rationale." Educational Management and Leadership 45 (5): 749-758, 750). Globally, the maintenance of pipelines of confident and capable principals is a priority, but principal preparation programmes have often been described as decontextualised and inadequate (Cheung and Walker 2006. "Inner Worlds and Outer Limits: The Formation of Beginning School Principals in Hong Kong." Journal of Educational Administration 44 (4): 389-407). Consequently, without opportunity to develop leadership strategies and reflect critically with a trusted mentor, newly-appointed principals often leave the role prematurely (Marks 2013. "Leadership Succession and Retention: It's Time to Get Serious about a Principal Retention Policy." Leading and Managing 19 (2): 1-14). This Australian study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a Queensland Department of Education and Training coaching programme for beginning principals, designed to secure future quality leaders. A custom-built philosophy incorporated support from local master principals and a high degree of autonomy. One-on-one interviews with programme participants confirmed that: enduring professional relationships resulted from a safe-space approach; knowledge and understanding of the Australian Professional Standards for Principals (AITSL 2014. Australian Professional Standard for Principals and the Leadership Profiles. Canberra: Australian Government) increased; and feelings of empowerment and control of leadership situations accelerated. For the benefit of leadership pipelines worldwide, new principals in other contexts may be energised to continue with the complex role of being effective school leaders through similar, autonomous and peer-supported programmes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A focus on quality assurance of assessment processes in tertiary education within Australia and throughout the world has resulted in a changing landscape of assessment types and grading schemes over the last decade. The use of criteria and standards-based assessment systems are now very commonplace in tertiary education. There are a variety of models now used, but typically they include a criteria sheet and a levelled rubric. An alternative to the traditional matrix-style rubric is the Continua Model of a Guide to Making Judgments (GTMJ). In this paper, we analyse available assessment models and their capacity to guide the marking, grading and moderation of student assessment tasks. We specifically address standards descriptors used to identify the quality expected at each standard. The research was undertaken through a community of practice within the School of Education at a tertiary institution where the collective goal of enhancing assessment grading tools to improve student outcomes was approached through a process of peer review. In our results section, we analyse the efficacy of an internal peer-review model as part of a community of practice and the professional learning about grading tools that occurs. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]