1. The Mayo Portland Adaptability Inventory-4 outcome measure is superior to UK FIM+FAM in a British military population.
- Author
-
McGilloway, Emer, Mitchell, James, Dharm-Datta, Shreshth, Roberts, Andrew, Tilley, Haydn, and Etherington, John
- Subjects
BRAIN injuries ,COGNITION ,COMPARATIVE studies ,NEUROLOGIC examination ,LENGTH of stay in hospitals ,HOSPITAL admission & discharge ,LIFE skills ,LONGITUDINAL method ,NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL tests ,RESEARCH methodology ,EVALUATION of medical care ,MEDICAL rehabilitation ,MOTOR ability ,HEALTH outcome assessment ,PATIENTS ,REHABILITATION centers ,MILITARY personnel ,STATISTICS ,DATA analysis ,PSYCHOSOCIAL factors ,DISCHARGE planning ,RESEARCH methodology evaluation ,REHABILITATION for brain injury patients ,DATA analysis software ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,GLASGOW Coma Scale ,FRIEDMAN test (Statistics) - Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to identify the most appropriate rehabilitation outcome measure for use in a young adult population with acquired brain injury. Methods: A 2-year prospective study of patients admitted to a UK military neuro-rehabilitation unit with acquired brain injury to compare the appropriateness of the Functional Independence Measure/Functional Assessment Measure (FIM+FAM) vs the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory Version 4 (MPAI-4) in assessing outcomes. Patients were assessed at admission, discharge and at 4-month follow-up using FIM+FAM and MPAI-4. Results: The FIM+FAM total motor score showed a marked ceiling affect, 42% of patients scored the maximum on admission rising to 80% at discharge. The MPAI-4 did not show significant ceiling effects. The other sub-scales of FIM+FAM and MPAI-4 were generally comparable, no more than 17% achieved ceiling at follow-up. Conclusions: This is the first comparative study of FIM+FAM and MPAI-4 in a young adult military population following acquired brain injury. All patients showed improvements in both outcome measures following intensive inpatient rehabilitation. However, the MPAI-4 did not show ceiling effects in motor scores. This measure was, therefore, found to be more appropriate in the cohort. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF