Search

Objective: To determine whether large head circumference increases the risk of vacuum extraction failure. Study design: This EMR-based study included all attempted vacuum extractions performed in a tertiary center between January 2010 and June 2015. All term singleton live births were eligible. Cases were divided into four groups: head circumference ≥90th percentile both with birth weight ≥90th percentile and <90th percentile and fetal head circumference <90th percentile with birth weight ≥90th and <90th percentile. Risk of failed vacuum extraction was compared among these groups. Other neonatal and maternal parameters were also evaluated as potential risk factors. Multinomial multivariable regression provided adjusted odds ratio for vacuum extraction failure while controlling for potential confounders. Results: During the study period, 48,007 deliveries met inclusion criteria, of which 3835 had an attempt at vacuum extraction. We identified 215 (5.6%) cases of vacuum extraction failure. The adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for vacuum extraction failure in cases of large fetal head circumference was 2.31 (95%CI, 1.7-3.15, p < .001). Primiparity, prolonged second stage and occipito-posterior presentation were also found to be significant risk factors for failed vacuum extraction. Comments: In this study, we found that large head circumference was associated with vacuum extraction failure rather than high birth weight. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the association of obstetric, maternal, and fetal variables with successful membrane sweeping and to develop a calculator that can predict spontaneous delivery within 24 hours of membrane sweeping. Methods: This secondary analysis of the STRIP-G Study included all singleton term parturients who underwent membrane sweeping in a tertiary center in October 2011 to July 2013. Primary end point was a 24-hour time interval from sweeping to delivery. Women who delivered without formal induction within the 24-hour interval were included in the "successful sweeping group". Stepwise logistic regression was used to calculate the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for successful membrane sweeping and to create the calculator. The predictive power of the calculator was evaluated by area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and by Nagelkerke R-square. The model was validated by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and by these validation measures: sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value. Results: We analyzed data from 542 women. Parity (aOR = 1.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-2.54), cervical dilation (aOR = 3.33, 95%CI 2.04-5.44), and gestational age (aOR = 1.44, 95%CI 1.21-1.72) were independent predictors of spontaneous delivery during the first 24 hours. A cross validation procedure showed that the calculator had a good accuracy (68%). Conclusions: A simple calculator based on maternal age, parity, gestational age, cervical dilatation, effacement and station, can accurately predict the chances of delivery within 24 hours of membrane sweeping. This may assist physicians better counseling of women regarding the likelihood of successful membrane sweeping. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the association of obstetric, maternal, and fetal variables with successful membrane sweeping and to develop a calculator that can predict spontaneous delivery within 24 hours of membrane sweeping.Methods: This secondary analysis of the STRIP-G Study included all singleton term parturients who underwent membrane sweeping in a tertiary center in October 2011 to July 2013. Primary end point was a 24-hour time interval from sweeping to delivery. Women who delivered without formal induction within the 24-hour interval were included in the "successful sweeping group". Stepwise logistic regression was used to calculate the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for successful membrane sweeping and to create the calculator. The predictive power of the calculator was evaluated by area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and by Nagelkerke R-square. The model was validated by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and by these validation measures: sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value.Results: We analyzed data from 542 women. Parity (aOR = 1.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-2.54), cervical dilation (aOR = 3.33, 95%CI 2.04-5.44), and gestational age (aOR = 1.44, 95%CI 1.21-1.72) were independent predictors of spontaneous delivery during the first 24 hours. A cross validation procedure showed that the calculator had a good accuracy (68%).Conclusions: A simple calculator based on maternal age, parity, gestational age, cervical dilatation, effacement and station, can accurately predict the chances of delivery within 24 hours of membrane sweeping. This may assist physicians better counseling of women regarding the likelihood of successful membrane sweeping. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Vacuum extraction of a macrosomic fetus is considered a risk factor for shoulder dystocia (SD). We evaluated maternal and fetal outcomes following vacuum extraction of macrosomic infants.Methods: A retrospective cohort study conducted in two large teaching hospitals. All deliveries of macrosomic infants by vacuum extraction and vaginal delivery were compared. The primary outcome measure was SD. Secondary outcome measures were severe perineal lacerations and postpartum hemorrhage. For statistical analysis, we used McNemar's test and χ2 or Fisher's exact tests. Odds ratios were analyzed via a logistic regression model.Results: From 2003 to 2013, there were 6019 (5.45%) deliveries of macrosomic fetuses, and 230 (0.21%) were delivered by vacuum extraction. There were 23 (10%) and seven (3.04%) cases of SD in the study and control groups, respectively. The risk of SD was significantly higher in the study group (p > 0.05). We found a significant association between SD and vacuum delivery [p = 0.003; OR = 3.54 (95% CI: 1.49-8.42)]. The composite adverse neonatal outcome rate was 6.5% (15/230) and 1.7% (4/230) in the study and control groups, respectively (p = 0.009).Conclusion: Vacuum extraction of a macrosomic infant is a risk factor for shoulder dystocia but not for postpartum hemorrhage or severe vaginal tears. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the association of obstetric, maternal, and fetal variables with successful membrane sweeping and to develop a calculator that can predict spontaneous delivery within 24 hours of membrane sweeping. Methods: This secondary analysis of the STRIP-G Study included all singleton term parturients who underwent membrane sweeping in a tertiary center in October 2011 to July 2013. Primary end point was a 24-hour time interval from sweeping to delivery. Women who delivered without formal induction within the 24-hour interval were included in the "successful sweeping group". Stepwise logistic regression was used to calculate the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for successful membrane sweeping and to create the calculator. The predictive power of the calculator was evaluated by area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and by Nagelkerke R-square. The model was validated by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and by these validation measures: sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value. Results: We analyzed data from 542 women. Parity (aOR = 1.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-2.54), cervical dilation (aOR = 3.33, 95%CI 2.04-5.44), and gestational age (aOR = 1.44, 95%CI 1.21-1.72) were independent predictors of spontaneous delivery during the first 24 hours. A cross validation procedure showed that the calculator had a good accuracy (68%). Conclusions: A simple calculator based on maternal age, parity, gestational age, cervical dilatation, effacement and station, can accurately predict the chances of delivery within 24 hours of membrane sweeping. This may assist physicians better counseling of women regarding the likelihood of successful membrane sweeping. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the association of obstetric, maternal, and fetal variables with successful membrane sweeping and to develop a calculator that can predict spontaneous delivery within 24 hours of membrane sweeping.Methods: This secondary analysis of the STRIP-G Study included all singleton term parturients who underwent membrane sweeping in a tertiary center in October 2011 to July 2013. Primary end point was a 24-hour time interval from sweeping to delivery. Women who delivered without formal induction within the 24-hour interval were included in the "successful sweeping group". Stepwise logistic regression was used to calculate the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for successful membrane sweeping and to create the calculator. The predictive power of the calculator was evaluated by area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and by Nagelkerke R-square. The model was validated by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and by these validation measures: sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value.Results: We analyzed data from 542 women. Parity (aOR = 1.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-2.54), cervical dilation (aOR = 3.33, 95%CI 2.04-5.44), and gestational age (aOR = 1.44, 95%CI 1.21-1.72) were independent predictors of spontaneous delivery during the first 24 hours. A cross validation procedure showed that the calculator had a good accuracy (68%).Conclusions: A simple calculator based on maternal age, parity, gestational age, cervical dilatation, effacement and station, can accurately predict the chances of delivery within 24 hours of membrane sweeping. This may assist physicians better counseling of women regarding the likelihood of successful membrane sweeping. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]