Search

Objective. Predicting the invasion depth of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SESCC) is important when selecting among therapeutic strategies. The aim of this study was to compare magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) with endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for predicting the depth of tumor invasion in patients with SESCC. Methods. This study enrolled 51 patients with SESCC (52 SESCC lesions) who underwent both ME-NBI and EUS at Pusan National University Hospital during 2010-2013. We reviewed the patients' medical records and compared ME-NBI and EUS findings with histopathological results according to clinicopathological factors. Results. A total of 46 lesions in 45 patients were included in the final analysis. ME-NBI and EUS had overall accuracies of 76.1% and 84.8%, respectively, in distinguishing mucosal from non-mucosal cancers. There were no differences between ME-NBI and EUS in terms of sensitivities and specificities in distinguishing mucosal from non-mucosal cancers ( p = 0.500 and p = 0.688, respectively). When both ME-NBI and EUS suggested a mucosal depth of lesion invasion, the frequency of mucosal cancer in the final histopathology was 94%. However, if either ME-NBI or EUS suggested a non-mucosal depth of invasion, the frequency of mucosal cancer was only 21%. Conclusion. ME-NBI and EUS are accurate predictors of SESCC invasion depth. If both methods suggest a mucosal depth of lesion invasion, the accuracy of the prediction is increased. Therefore, when possible, it would be better to evaluate the invasion depth of SESCC using both ME-NBI and EUS before deciding to perform endoscopic resection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. Surgical resection is the treatment of choice for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SESCC), but it is associated with high mortality and morbidity rates. Recently, endoscopic resection for SESCC has been indicated for patients with a low risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM). Therefore, to successfully treat SESCC with endoscopic resection, it is very important to identify patients with a low risk for LNM. The objective of this study was to investigate clinicopathologic factors that predict LNM in patients who underwent esophagectomy for SESCC. Methods. The study included 104 patients with SESCC from three university hospitals in Pusan, Korea. Clinicopathologic factors were evaluated to identify independent factors predicting LNM by univariate and multivariate analyses. Results. In univariate analysis, the depth of tumor invasion and lymphovascular invasion had significant influences on LNM ( p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Gross type, tumor size, and tumor differentiation were not predictive for LNM. In multivariate analysis, the depth of tumor invasion and lymphovascular invasion were significantly associated with LNM in patients with SESCC (OR 9.04, p = 0.049; OR 11.61, p = 0.002, respectively). Conclusions. The depth of tumor invasion and lymphovascular invasion were independent predictors of LNM in patients with SESCC. Therefore, endoscopic resection could be performed in patients with SESCC that is limited to the mucosa, without lymphovascular invasion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) may facilitate tissue sampling for histopathological diagnosis of subepithelial tumors (SETs) in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. However, immunohistochemistry is not always feasible using EUS-FNA samples due to the low quality of specimens often obtained by aspiration. This study aimed to compare the use of 22-gauge (G) EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) with 22G EUS-FNA for core sampling used for histopathological examination, including immunohistochemistry, in patients with GI SETs. Methods. Twenty-eight patients with GI SETs ≥2 cm in size were prospectively enrolled at five university hospitals in Korea between January and June 2013. They were randomized to undergo either EUS-FNB or EUS-FNA. Results. A total of 22 patients was finally analyzed in this study: 10 and 12 patients underwent EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB, respectively. Compared to the EUS-FNA group, the EUS-FNB group had a significantly lower median number of needle passes to obtain macroscopically optimal core samples (4 vs. 2, p = 0.025); higher yield rates of macroscopically and histologically optimal core samples with three needle passes (30% vs. 92%, p = 0.006; 20% vs. 75%, p = 0.010, respectively); and a higher diagnostic sufficiency rate (20% vs. 75%, p = 0.010). No technical difficulties were encountered in either group. Conclusions. This study shows that EUS-FNB has a better ability to obtain histological core samples and a higher diagnostic sufficiency rate than EUS-FNA and that EUS-FNB is a feasible, safe, and preferable modality for adequate core sampling for histopathological diagnosis of GI SETs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. Limited information is available on predictors of the response to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Endoscopic grading of gastroesophageal flap valve (GEFV) is simple and reproducible, and can provide useful information on patients with suspected reflux undergoing an endoscopy. The aim of this study was to prospectively identify predictors, including endoscopic findings such as GEFV, for PPI treatment outcomes in patients with GERD. Material and methods. One hundred and fifty consecutive patients with GERD were enrolled. All patients were treated with pantoprazole 40 mg daily for 8 weeks. Treatment response was defined as greater than 50% reduction in symptom scores between the two symptom assessments (i.e., over 4 or 8 weeks). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses between responders and non-responders were performed to identify variables predicting response to pantoprazole treatment. Results. Of the 150 consecutive patients considered for this study, 31 were excluded based on exclusion criteria and/or refusal to participate, leaving 119 eligible patients. After 4-week pantoprazole treatment, 70 of 119 (58.8%) patients were classified as responders. Patients with obesity and Helicobacter pylori infection demonstrated a higher response rate to 4-week pantoprazole treatment (odds ratio (OR) 5.28, p == 0.008; OR 3.76, p == 0.023, respectively). Patients with abnormal GEFV showed a lower response rate to 4-week treatment (OR 0.17, p == 0.016). After 8-week treatment, 86 of 119 (72.3%) patients were classified as responders. Abnormal GEFV and aspirin intake were associated with a lower response rate to 8-week treatment (OR 0.17, p == 0.021; OR 0.11, p == 0.020, respectively). Conclusions. Abnormal GEFV was a significant independent factor predicting poor response to both 4-week and 8-week pantoprazole treatment. Endoscopic grading of GEFV provides useful information for predicting the response to PPI treatment in patients with GERD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. Submucosal tumors (SMTs) are occasionally found in the esophagus during upper endoscopy. Granular cell tumors (GCTs) are reported to be the second most common esophageal mesenchymal tumors, after leiomyomas. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is an effective tool for predicting the histologic characteristics of SMTs by providing an accurate image of the layering structure of the esophagus, but it is hard to differentiate GCTs from submucosal leiomyomas accurately with conventional EUS. The aim of the present study was to characterize the EUS features of GCTs compared with those of submucosal leiomyomas using a high-frequency catheter probe EUS. Material and methods. A total of 41 patients with GCTs or submucosal leiomyomas were included. All of the patients underwent EUS before histologic confirmation by endoscopic resection or biopsy. Results. There were 14 GCTs in 12 patients and 30 leiomyomas in 29 patients. GCTs had a white-to-yellow surface color more frequently than leiomyomas. In comparison with the surrounding normal proper muscle layer, the echogenicity of the leiomyomas was similar to that of the surrounding muscle layer, but more than half of the GCTs were hyperechoic compared to the surrounding muscle layer. Unclear borders were observed more frequently in GCTs than in leiomyomas. The presence of at least two of these three features in a given tumor had a sensitivity of 85.7%, a specificity of 96.7%, and an accuracy of 93.2% for predicting GCTs. Conclusions. High-frequency probe EUS is helpful for differentiating esophageal GCTs from submucosal leiomyomas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. Unlike surgery, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) removes gastric epithelial neoplasms within a tight margin, leaving most normal tissue around the neoplasm intact, thus resulting in a high risk for missed synchronous gastric epithelial neoplasms (mSGENs). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the characteristics and risk factors of mSGENs (mSGENs) compared to simultaneously identified SGENs (siSGENs) in patients who underwent ESD. Materials and methods. The authors have retrospectively examined 312 SGENs from 275 patients treated with ESD at three hospitals in Korea between January 2004 and May 2011. The incidence and clinicopathological features of SGENs, mSGENs, and siSGENs were investigated. Any second epithelial neoplasm found within 1 year of the first ESD procedure was defined as an mSGEN and any neoplasm detected simultaneously with the first neoplasm was defined as a siSGEN. Results. The overall incidence of ESD patients with SGENs was 9.1% (275 of 3018 patients). Of the SGENs, 45.2% were siSGENs and 54.8% were mSGENs. Independent risk factors for mSGENs were adenoma as the first gastric lesion (Exp (B) = 2.154, 95% CI: 1.282-3.262) and duration of endoscopic examination before the first ESD (Exp (B) = 1.074, 95% CI: 1.001-1.141). The results suggest that 33% of mSGENs could have been identified during the endoscopic examination prior to ESD. Conclusion. Additional effort needs to be expended in identifying siSGENs, particularly prior to ESD for less serious adenomas. This should include sufficient time for endoscopic examination, prior to ESD, to ensure a thorough examination for siSGENs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. Sorafenib has been shown to improve survival of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, its tolerance in clinical practice has not been well evaluated, and whether sorafenib should be continued in cases of tumor progression or intolerance has not been established. The authors retrospectively assessed sorafenib tolerability, and evaluated the clinical course in patients who showed progression during sorafenib treatment. Material and methods. Between March 2008 and July 2010, 80 patients with advanced HCC were treated with sorafenib. Results. With a median of 78.5 days of treatment, 15% discontinued sorafenib due to adverse events. The duration was significantly longer in patients with Child-Pugh class A liver function (233 ± 240 days) than in those with Child-Pugh class B (100 ± 136 days; p = 0.006). The overall progression rate was 53% (43/80), with a median time to progression of 105 days (95% confidence interval, 59-150 days). After progression, 14 patients received conservative care only (group 1), 14 continued sorafenib monotherapy (group 2), 6 changed to treatment without sorafenib (group 3) and 9 underwent additional treatment with concomitant sorafenib (group 4). Survival after progression was significantly better in groups 2, 3 and 4 than in group 1 ( p = 0.001). Conclusions. Sorafenib was tolerable for most patients in clinical practice and may be continued in patients who show progression during sorafenib therapy. However, it was less well tolerated in patients with Child-Pugh class B liver function and should be used with caution in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]