Search

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor ertugliflozin across racial groups in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).Methods: Pooled analysis of data from randomized, double-blind studies in the ertugliflozin phase III development program. Seven placebo- and comparator-controlled studies were used to assess safety (N = 4859) and three placebo-controlled studies were used to assess efficacy (N = 1544). Least-squares (LS) mean change from baseline was calculated for glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), body weight and systolic blood pressure (SBP). Safety evaluation included overall and prespecified adverse events (AEs).Results: At Week 26, ertugliflozin provided a greater reduction in HbA1c, body weight and SBP versus placebo in all racial subgroups. The placebo-adjusted LS mean change (95% confidence interval) from baseline in HbA1c was -0.8% (-1.0, -0.7) and -1.0% (-1.1, -0.8) with ertugliflozin 5 mg and 15 mg, respectively, in the White subgroup, -0.7% (-1.2, -0.2) and -0.8% (-1.3, -0.3) in the Black subgroup, and -0.8% (-1.1, -0.5) and -1.0% (-1.3, -0.8) in the Asian subgroup. The incidences of overall AEs, serious AEs and AEs leading to discontinuation from study medication were similar between the ertugliflozin 5 mg, 15 mg and non-ertugliflozin groups within each racial subgroup. The incidence of female genital mycotic infection (GMI) was higher with ertugliflozin than non-ertugliflozin across all racial subgroups. The incidence of male GMI was higher with ertugliflozin than non-ertugliflozin in the White sub-group; however, there were few male GMI events in the non-White subgroups.Conclusions: In patients with T2DM, treatment with ertugliflozin improved HbA1c, body weight and SBP across all racial subgroups. Ertugliflozin had a generally similar safety profile across racial subgroups and was generally well tolerated. Clinicaltrials.gov identifiers: NCT01986855, NCT01999218, NCT01958671, NCT02099110, NCT02036515, NCT02033889, and NCT02226003. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of ertugliflozin in Hispanic/Latino patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM).Methods: Analysis of data from Hispanic/Latino patients who participated in randomized, double-blind phase III studies. Ertugliflozin efficacy was evaluated when initiated as a single agent (as monotherapy or add-on therapy) and when initiated in combination with sitagliptin. Least-squares mean change from baseline was calculated for glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), body weight (BW), and systolic blood pressure (SBP). Safety evaluation included overall and prespecified adverse events (AEs).Results: Analyses included 1178 Hispanic/Latino patients. In a pooled analysis of three placebo-controlled studies where ertugliflozin was initiated as a single agent, the placebo-corrected change from baseline in HbA1c at week 26 for ertugliflozin 5 and 15 mg was -0.8 and -1.0%, respectively. In an active-comparator study, when initiated as a single agent, the change from baseline in HbA1c at week 52 was -0.5, -0.7, and -0.5% for ertugliflozin 5 mg, ertugliflozin 15 mg, and glimepiride, respectively. In a placebo-controlled study, when initiated in combination with sitagliptin, the placebo-corrected change from baseline in HbA1c at week 26 for ertugliflozin 5 mg/sitagliptin and ertugliflozin 15 mg/sitagliptin was -1.3 and -1.6%, respectively. In an active-comparator study, when initiated in combination with sitagliptin, the change from baseline in HbA1c at week 26 was -1.4, -1.6, and -0.9 for ertugliflozin 5 mg/sitagliptin, ertugliflozin 15 mg/sitagliptin, and sitagliptin alone, respectively. Reductions in BW and SBP were observed with ertugliflozin as a single agent or combined with sitagliptin. The incidences of overall and prespecified AEs in Hispanic/Latino patients were generally consistent with the known safety profile of ertugliflozin.Conclusion: Ertugliflozin, administered as a single agent or as a combination with sitagliptin, improved HbA1c, BW, and SBP. Ertugliflozin was generally well-tolerated in Hispanic/Latino patients with T2DM. Clinicaltrials.gov identifiers: NCT01986855, NCT01999218, NCT01958671, NCT02099110, NCT02036515, NCT02033889, and NCT02226003. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of ertugliflozin over 104 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) inadequately controlled on metformin. Methods: In this double-blind, multicenter, randomized, phase III study (VERTIS SU; NCT01999218), adults with T2DM and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) 7.0-9.0% on metformin ≥1500 mg/day received ertugliflozin 5 mg or 15 mg, or glimepiride. The primary efficacy time point was Week 52; double-blinded treatment continued until Week 104. Results: Baseline characteristics of randomized, treated patients (n = 1315) were similar across groups (mean age 58.2 years, HbA1c 7.8%); 76.4% completed the study; 61.6% completed on study medication. Mean glimepiride dose at 104 weeks was 3.5 mg/day. At Week 104, least squares mean change from baseline in HbA1c (95% confidence intervals) were -0.3% (-0.4, -0.2), -0.4% (-0.5, -0.3) and -0.4% (-0.5, -0.3) for ertugliflozin 5 mg, 15 mg, and glimepiride, respectively. Ertugliflozin provided sustained reductions in body weight and systolic blood pressure (SBP) over 104 weeks. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs was similar across groups. The incidence of symptomatic hypoglycemia was 3.8%, 6.4% and 22.1% in the ertugliflozin 5 mg, 15 mg, and glimepiride groups, respectively. Genital mycotic infections were reported in 5.3%, 2.6% and 0% of men, respectively, and 9.2%, 12.3% and 1.4% of women, respectively. The incidence of urinary tract infection and hypovolemia AEs was similar across groups. Conclusions: Ertugliflozin was well tolerated and provided clinically meaningful glycemic control and durable reductions in body weight and SBP over 104 weeks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

SUMMARY This study assesses age-related changes in children's perceptions of transgressors subjected to varied reprimands. Twelve children at each of three school grade levels (first, third, sixth) watched one of four sequences in which a boy violated a given rule and was then exposed to one of three types of reprimand (retributive, restitutive, explanatory) or no reprimand. The children judged the transgressor by locating him on a scale from extremely good to extremely bad, and by predicting other morally related behaviors. Analyses of variance showed that statistically significant variations in children's judgments of the transgressors are attributable to reprimand type and to grade level of Ss. Results are interpreted as indicative of children developing the view that reprimand brings about behavior change, and does not simply convey the negative evaluation of the reprimander. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Male and female child-care workers (N = 51) judged and then reported attributions to varied reprimand techniques. Retributive, restitutive, and explanatory reprimands were represented in separate videotaped sequences. After viewing a filmed scenario which showed one of the reprimand techniques, each participant recorded judgments regarding characteristics of that method of reprimand. Judgments were registered by marking a seven-point scale associated with each of 14 questions inquiring into such matters as the extent of the reprimand's leniency-severity, effectiveness-ineffectiveness, and commonality of use. Peer judgments about worker effectiveness yielded a measure which served as a second independent variable. A multivariate analysis of variance was used to evaluate the variations in judgment that were associated with varied reprimand techniques and varied worker effectiveness. Workers discriminated the three reprimand conditions along one dimension that delineates the leniency and commonality of use of the reprimand. Discriminations also were made along an overall effectiveness dimension. Worker effectiveness status was not systematically related to differing attributions to the varied reprimand techniques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Assesses developmentaly related effects of the judge knowing conditions motivating the 'transgressor' to enter situations and of the judge having more or less information about the 'transgressor.' Assumption that young children negatively evaluate both accidental and intentional transgressors; Interpretation of findings as indication of developing skill in combining data to make an impression.