Search

Objective: Immune-mediated inner ear disease (IMIED) might cause severe/profound hearing loss and these patients are considered ideal candidates to cochlear implant (CI) surgery. The aim of the study was to evaluate impedance changes over time.Method: The Study Group (SG) was composed of CI IMIED patients (31 ears) and a Control Group (CG) of CI patients with hearing loss not related to their immune system (31 ears). Audiological performance and impedance values were measured and compared amongst groups at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months following the fitting sessions.Results: Speech perception was significantly better for SG in word and sentence recognition in quiet. Impedance values were, on average, significantly higher for apical and middle electrode segments in SG compared to CG at the 3- month follow-up and were maintained over time. Additionally, a subset of SG patients (active patients) experienced significantly greater impedance fluctuation corresponding to clinical symptom reactivation.Conclusion: IMIED patients achieve good audiological performance. However, the relapsing inflammation could change the inner ear environment, causing impedance fluctuations and, consequently, more frequent CI fittings. Additionally, impedance evaluation could be utilized as an early warning sign of IMIED recurrence and as an aid to therapeutic decision-making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Conclusion: CBCT allows a precise evaluation of the dimensions and of the shape of the cochlear duct that is of primary importance for the choice of the length and the design of the electrode array. This radio-histological study confirms that CBCT is a reliable tool to be used in clinical studies to evaluate the position of straight electrode arrays within the cochlear scala. Objective: To validate the reliability of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in the evaluation of cochlear anatomy and positioning of a straight electrode array, by comparing radiological images to histological analysis of cochlear implanted temporal bones. Methods: Eight temporal bones for four subjects were analysed before and after cochlear implantation with a straight electrode array. The size of the cochlea, the dimensions, and shape of the cochlear duct at 180° and 360° were evaluated on CBCT performed before implantation. Temporal bones then underwent histological analysis to determine the position of the electrode array. Scalar localization of the electrode array was assessed on CBCT performed after implantation, and compared with histological study. Results: CBCT is a reliable radiological technique to differentiate variability not only of cochlear dimensions, but also of size and shape of the cochlea. Histological analysis confirmed the scalar position of the electrode array assessed by the CBCT in 7/8 temporal bones, but soft tissue trauma such as dissection of the spiral ligament was not identified by the CBCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To compare the fitting time requirements and the efficiency in achieving improvements in speech perception during the first 6 months after initial stimulation of computer-assisted fitting with the Fitting to Outcome eXpert' (FOX) and a standard clinical fitting procedure. Method Twenty-seven post-lingually deafened adults, newly implanted recipients of the Advanced Bionics HiRes 90K™ cochlear implant from Germany, the UK, and France took part in a controlled, randomized, clinical study. Speech perception was measured for all participants and fitting times were compared across groups programmed using FOX and conventional programming methods. Results The fitting time for FOX was significantly reduced at 14 days (P < 0.001) but equivalent over the 6-month period. The groups were not well matched for duration of deafness; therefore, speech perception could not be compared across groups. Discussion Despite including more objective measures of performance than a standard fitting approach and the adjustment of a greater range of parameters during initial fitting, FOX did not add to the overall fitting time when compared to the conventional approach. FOX significantly reduced the fitting time in the first 2 weeks and by providing a standard fitting protocol, reduced variability across centres. Conclusions FOX computer-assisted fitting can be successfully used at switch on, in different clinical environments, reducing fitting time in the first 2 weeks and is efficient at providing a usable program. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Conclusion: Residual hearing could be preserved with various arrays ranging from 16 to 18 mm in insertion length and 0.25 to 0.5 mm tip diameter. Whether array insertion is performed through a cochleostomy or a round window, tip diameter is an essential criterion for the array design to improve hearing preservation results. Objectives: The goal of this study was to report the outcome of patients implanted with electric acoustic cochlear implants with various surgical techniques and array designs. Methods: Thirty-two implanted ears (30 patients) were included in this retrospective study. Three array models were inserted: Contour Advance implant ( n = 16), Nucleus Hybrid-L ( n = 12), and Med-El Flex EAS ( n = 4). Postoperative pure tone audiometry was performed at 3 and 12 months after implantation. Results: Three months postoperatively, hearing preservation within 30 dB was achieved in 50%, 50%, and 84% cases of patients implanted with a Contour Advance, Flex-EAS, and Hybrid-L, respectively. Two patients (Hybrid-L group) had a delayed sudden hearing loss (> 30 dB) 3 months postoperatively and three patients (Contour Advance group) had total hearing loss at 1 year. Best results were achieved using arrays with small tip diameters. Cochleostomy or round window insertion did not affect hearing preservation results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this study was to evaluate the benefit of cochlear implantation in adults aged 60 years and over. Twenty-eight patients, older than 60 years and with profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, received a cochlear implant between 1991 and 2001. The mean age was 66 years and the median follow-up was 22.5 months. Speech perception scores before and after implantation were analyzed retrospectively in order to evaluate the benefit of cochlear implantation. There was a significant improvement of the disyllabic words and sentences scores after implantation. The patients who were over 70 years performed as well as those who were younger. The surgical procedure was well tolerated in all patients. One patient developed a postoperative vertigo due to a perilymphatic fistula. In conclusion, cochlear implantation offers improvement in speech perception to the elderly population, as in the younger population. A careful assessment of the physical status of these patients remains essential in order to evaluate the risk-benefit of this procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]