Search

Objective: To compare postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) patient outcomes before and after an in situ instructional design based PPH simulation attended by obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) residents.Methods: This uncontrolled before-and-after study was conducted in Recife, Brazil including all 1388 women delivering from June to August 2012 and all 1357 delivering from June to August 2013. The 36 OBGYN residents were divided into13 teams of two or three participants and were trained through ID based PPH simulation training with the following eight steps: (1) prior knowledge activation, (2) video demonstration, (3) dual-coding PPH protocol discussion-an image association during the training, (4) training scenario # 1, (5) debriefing, (6) training scenario # 2 with immediate feedback, (7) training scenario # 3, and (8) debriefing with self-assessment. The training scenarios had an increasing level of complexity. The main goal of the training was the adequate management of PPH and situational awareness improvement-the ability to anticipate, recognize, and intercept unfolding error chains. The primary patient outcomes rates used for the before and after comparison were therapeutic uterotonics use within 24 h of birth and blood transfusion. Secondary outcomes were therapeutic oxytocin mean dosage IU within 24 h of birth, postpartum Hb < 6 g/dL, among others. Chi-square test was used for categorical variables comparison and independent t-test for continuous variables.Results: PPH rates were 100 (7.2% of 2012 deliveries) and 80 cases (5.9% of 2013 deliveries), respectively. Comparison of primary post- and pre-simulation outcomes revealed no significant differences. However, in the comparison for therapeutic oxytocin mean dosage IU within 24 h of birth, there was an increase found after the simulation (15.98 ± 7.4 versus 25.1 ± 12.3; p < .001). For all other outcome measures, there were no statistical differences.Conclusions:In situ ID based PPH simulation leads to an increase in the mean dosage of oxytocin after training, in selected cases. This may indicate better situational awareness when managing women with PPH. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background:It remains unclear which item format would best suit the assessment of clinical reasoning: context-rich single best answer questions (crSBAs) or key-feature problems (KFPs). This study compared KFPs and crSBAs with respect to students’ acceptance, their educational impact, and psychometric characteristics when used in a summative end-of-clinical-clerkship pediatric exam. Methods:Fifth-year medical students (n = 377) took a computer-based exam that included 6–9 KFPs and 9–20 crSBAs which assessed their clinical reasoning skills, in addition to an objective structured clinical exam (OSCE) that assessed their clinical skills. Each KFP consisted of a case vignette and three key features using a “long-menu” question format. We explored students’ perceptions of the KFPs and crSBAs in eight focus groups and analyzed statistical data of 11 exams. Results:Compared to crSBAs, KFPs were perceived as more realistic and difficult, providing a greater stimulus for the intense study of clinical reasoning, and were generally well accepted. The statistical analysis revealed no difference in difficulty, but KFPs resulted more reliable and efficient than crSBAs. The correlation between the two formats was high, while KFPs correlated more closely with the OSCE score. Conclusions:KFPs with long-menu exams seem to bring about a positive educational effect without psychometric drawbacks. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Background: Emotional Intelligence (EI) is the ability to deal with your own and others emotions. Medical students are inducted into medical schools on the basis of their academic achievement. Professionally, however, their success rate is variable and may depend on their interpersonal relationships. EI is thought to be significant in achieving good interpersonal relationships and success in life and career. Therefore, it is important to measure EI and understand its correlates in an undergraduate medical student population. Aim: The objective of study was to investigate the relationship between the EI of medical students and their academic achievement (based on cumulative grade point average [CGPA]), age, gender and year of study. Methods: A cross-sectional survey design was used. The SSREIS and demographic survey were administered in the three medical schools in Saudi Arabia from April to May 2012. Results: The response rate was 30%. For the Optimism subscale, the mean score was M = 3.79, SD ± 0.54 ( α = 0.82), for Awareness-of-emotion subscale M = 3.94, SD ± 0.57 ( α = 0.72) and for Use-of-emotion subscale M = 3.92, SD ± 0.54 ( α = 0.63). Multiple regression showed a significant positive correlation between CGPA and the EI of medical students ( r = 0.246, p = 0.000) on the Optimism subscale. No correlation was seen between CGPA and Awareness of Emotions and Use of Emotions subscales. No relationship was seen for the other independent variables. Conclusion: The current study demonstrates that CGPA is the only significant predictor, indicating that Optimism tends to be higher for students with a higher CPGA. None of the other independent variables (age, year of study, gender) showed a significant relationship. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The potential richness of the feedback for learners and teachers is one of the educational advantages of progress tests (PTs). Every test administration yields information on a student's knowledge level in each sub-domain of the test (cross-sectional information), and it adds a next point to the corresponding knowledge growth curve (longitudinal information). Traditional paper-based feedback has severe limitations and requires considerable effort from the learners to give meaning to the data. We reasoned that the PT data should be flexibly accessible in all pathways and with any available comparison data, according to the personal interest of the learner. For that purpose, a web-based tool (Progress test Feedback, the ProF system) was developed. This article presents the principles and features of the generated feedback and shows how it can be used. In addition to enhancement of the feedback, the ProF database of longitudinal PT-data also provides new opportunities for research on knowledge growth, and these are currently being explored. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and aims: The learning environment of undergraduate research internships has received little attention, compared to postgraduate research training. This study investigates students' experiences with research internships, particularly the quality of supervision, development of research skills, the intellectual and social climate, infrastructure support, and the clarity of goals and the relationship between the experiences and the quality of students' research reports and their overall satisfaction with internships. Method: A questionnaire (23 items, a 5-point Likert scale) was administered to 101 Year five veterinary students after completion of a research internship. Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted with quality of supervision, development of research skills, climate, infrastructure and clarity of goals as independent variables and the quality of students' research reports and students' overall satisfaction as dependent variables. Results: The response rate was 79.2%. Students' experiences are generally positive. Students' experiences with the intellectual and social climate are significantly correlated with the quality of research reports whilst the quality of supervision is significantly correlated with both the quality of research reports and students' overall satisfaction with the internship. Conclusion: Both the quality of supervision and the climate are found to be crucial factors in students' research learning and satisfaction with the internship. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is a lack of explicit criteria for the assessment of students' research reports. Teachers tend to use their own, idiosyncratic sets of implicit criteria. A well-defined set of criteria could foster reliable and valid assessment of students' research reports. Aim: The aim of this study was twofold: to detect the strengths and weaknesses of students' research reports and to develop an assessment tool for students' research papers. Methods: On the basis of the literature and advice from experts, we developed a list of 19 criteria, comprising 15 specific items and 4 global items. Three raters, using the list, independently scored a sample of 18 research reports. Results: The strengths of the reports were the structure of the results and the description of materials and methods. The weaknesses were the research questions, the grounding of the study in the research literature, the analysis, the statistics, and the clarity of visuals. With three raters, the reliability of the rating scale was reasonable. Conclusion: The rating scale seems to be a useful tool for judging and giving feedback on students' research reports. These findings will have to be confirmed in studies with larger samples. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This research focuses on the relation between individual study and group discussion. In a problem-based curriculum, it is expected that the way students prepare themselves during individual study (i.e., search and prepare the literature) will influence the quality of the reporting phase. Purpose: To investigate whether searching for different literature resources and preparing the literature (by making summaries to explain the literature) affects the quality of the reporting phase. Method : A 23-item questionnaire was developed, reflecting 2 factors of the search phase and 1 factor of the preparing phase of the individual study. Two factors (breadth and depth of the discussion) reflected the reporting phase. Participants were 1st-year students (N = 195, 90%) at the Medical School of the Maastricht University in the Netherlands during the academic year 1997-1998. Results: Regression analyses show that the search phase and the preparing phase explained 29% of the variance of the breadth and 38% of the depth of the reporting phase. Conclusions: Searching different literature resources has a small and negative impact on the quality of the reporting phase. However, preparing extensively for the next tutorial meeting is very important, especially for the depth of the reporting phase. Therefore, when new knowledge must be integrated in the tutorial group, students must be taught to prepare themselves by making summaries that are useful and effective during the discussion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]