Search

Copyright of European Journal of Psychotraumatology is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

To systematically review the evidence on whether having current, ever asthma and asthma control is associated with levels of total, moderate and vigorous physical activity. We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CINAHL databases, limiting searches to English language papers from inception until Oct 2019. We synthesized the evidence comparing levels of total, moderate and vigorous physical activity between adults with and without current asthma or ever asthma by random effects meta-analyses. A total of 25 studies were included, with 18 of these included in meta-analyses. A meta-analysis of 4 case-control studies found that adults with current asthma were less active, with 942.12 steps fewer per day, than adults without current asthma (SMD = −0.39, 95%CI: −0.54, −0.24, I2 = 0). Meta-analysis of four-high quality cross-sectional studies found that those with current or ever asthma were more likely to be inactive than those without asthma (binary OR current asthma = 0.85, 95%CI: 0.82, 0.89, I2 = 45.6%, and binary OR ever asthma = 0.83, 0.75, 0.91, I2 = 0, respectively). Meta-analysis, inclusive of all 10 cross-sectional studies with binary ORs, supported this finding. There was also some evidence that adults with current asthma and ever asthma (6 studies with categorical ORs) were less likely to exercise moderately and vigorously, but these meta-analyses were limited by high heterogeneity. No synthesis of the studies considering asthma control was possible. Adults with current or ever asthma had lower levels of total, moderate and vigorous physical activity than those without asthma and may be missing out on the health benefits of being physically active. The association between asthma control and physical activity warrants further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate the impact of physical activity on asthma in middle-aged adults, in one longitudinal analysis, and one multi-centre cross-sectional analysis. Methods: The Respiratory Health in Northern Europe (RHINE) is a population-based postal questionnaire cohort study. Physical activity, height and weight were self-reported in Bergen, Norway, at RHINE II (1999–2001) and all centres at RHINE III (2010–2012). A longitudinal analysis of Bergen data investigated the association of baseline physical activity with follow-up asthma, incident asthma and symptoms, using logistic and zero-inflated Poisson regression (n = 1782). A cross-sectional analysis of all RHINE III centres investigated the association of physical activity with concurrent asthma and symptoms (n = 13,542) using mixed-effects models. Body mass index (BMI) was categorised (<20, 20–24.99, 25–29.99, 30+ kg/m2) and physical activity grouped by amount and frequency of lighter (no sweating/heavy breathing) and vigorous (sweating/heavy breathing) activity. Results: In the Bergen longitudinal analysis, undertaking light activity 3+ times/week at baseline was associated with less follow-up asthma (odds ratio [OR] 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22, 0.89), whilst an effect from undertaking vigorous activity 3+ times/week was not detected (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.44, 2.76). The associations were attenuated with BMI adjustment. In the all-centre cross-sectional analysis an interaction was found, with the association between physical activity and asthma varying across BMI categories. Conclusion: These findings suggest potential longer-term benefit from lighter physical activity, whilst improvement in asthma outcomes from increasing activity intensity was not evident. Additionally, it appears the benefit from physical activity may differ according to BMI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Despite the benefits of a physically active lifestyle, some studies suggest fear of exacerbations by both children and their parents limit physical activity in children with asthma. We undertook a systematic review to quantify the difference in objectively measured physical activity levels of children and adolescents with and without asthma.Data Sources: MEDLINE, PubMed and EMBASE.Study Selection: English language observational studies of children and adolescents to the age of 18 that compared objectively measured physical activity (accelerometer or pedometer devices) between those with asthma and without asthma.Results: Overall 22,285 articles were retrieved with 12 studies being included in the review: 1 cohort, 1 case-control and 10 cross-sectional. A meta-analysis of accelerometry data from the single cohort study and 8 cross-sectional studies produced an overall mean difference of 0.01 (95% CI: −0.09–0.11) activity counts per minute in children and adolescents without asthma compared to those with asthma.Conclusion: We did not find any evidence that children and adolescents with and without asthma engaged in different amounts of physical activity when measured objectively by accelerometers. Children and adolescents with asthma may not require differentially targeted policies to encourage more physical activity, however further longitudinal studies are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

AbstractObjectiveMethodsResultsConclusionsThe ‘two-hit’ hypothesis theorizes that early life allergic sensitization and respiratory infection interact to increase asthma risk.We sought to determine in a high allergy risk birth cohort whether interactions between early life allergic sensitization and respiratory infection were associated with increased risk for asthma at ages 6–7 years and 18 years. Allergic sensitization was assessed at 6, 12, and 24 months by skin prick testing to 3 food and 3 aeroallergens. Respiratory infection was defined as reported “cough, rattle, or wheeze” and assessed 4-weekly for 15 months, at 18 months, and age 2 years. Regression analysis was undertaken with parent-reported asthma at age 6–7 years and doctor diagnosed asthma at 18 years as distinct outcomes. Interactions between allergic sensitization and respiratory infection were explored with adjustment made for potential confounders.Odds of asthma were higher in sensitized compared to nonsensitized children at age 6–7 years (OR = 14.46; 95% CI 3.99–52.4), There was no evidence for interactions between allergic sensitization and early life respiratory infection, with a greater frequency of respiratory infection up to 2 years of age associated with increased odds for asthma at age 6–7 years in both sensitized (OR = 1.13; 95% CI 1.02–1.25, n = 199) and nonsensitized children (OR = 1.31; 1.11–1.53, n = 211) (p interaction = 0.089). At age 18 years, these associations were weaker.Our findings do not support ‘two-hit’ interactions between early life allergic sensitization and respiratory infection on asthma risk. Both early life respiratory infections and allergic sensitization were risk factors and children with either should be monitored closely for development of asthma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]