Search

ObjectiveFor subepithelial tumours (SETs) of the stomach, surgical resection is the gold standard treatment. With the recent advent of endoscopic resection techniques and devices, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been considered as an alternative treatment for SETs. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of ESD for treating gastric SETs compared with surgical resection.MethodsBetween January 2006 and September 2014, 55 patients with gastric SETs (13 gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs), 27 leiomyomas, and 15 others) were treated by ESD and 27 patients (19 GISTs, two leiomyomas, and six others) underwent surgical resection. We retrospectively reviewed the therapeutic outcomes, procedure-related complications, post-procedure hospital stays, and medical costs of the two groups.ResultsThe complete resection rate of the ESD group was lower than that of the surgery group (81.8%vs.100%,p = 0.026). Although the incidence of complications that occurred with ESD was higher than that associated with surgical resection, there were no significant between-group differences (12.5%vs.3.7%,p = 0.261), and all complicated cases were successfully treated without mortality. The ESD group had significantly shorter post-procedural hospital stays (median five daysvs.eight days,p = 0.034) and lower medical costs (median $2374vs. $4954,p <0.001) than the surgery group. There were no recurrences in either group during the follow-up period.ConclusionsESD is an efficient treatment tool for gastric SETs in selected patients. Additionally, ESD has the advantages of shorter hospital stays and lower medical costs compared with surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are effective in the prevention and treatment of thromboembolism; however, they are associated with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of gastroprotective agents (GPAs) in reducing the risk of UGIB in patients receiving DOACs. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 2076 patients who received DOACs for the prevention or treatment of thromboembolic events between January 2008 and July 2016. A cumulative incidence analysis using the Kaplan-Meier method was performed to determine the rate of UGIB and its association with GPAs administration. Results: Of the 2076 patients, 360 received GPAs. Over the follow-up period (1160 person-years), one patient in the GPA group (0.7 per 100 person-years) and 29 patients in the non-GPA group (2.8 per 100 person-years) developed UGIB (p=.189). In the multivariate analysis, UGIB was associated with older age (hazard ratio (HR), 1.041; p=.048), a history of peptic ulcer or UGIB (HR, 5.931; p<.001), and concomitant use of antiplatelet agents (HR, 3.121; p=.014). GPAs administration did not reduce the risk of UGIB (p=.289). However, based on the subgroup analysis of 225 patients with concomitant use of antiplatelet agents or a history of peptic ulcer or UGIB, the GPA group (0 per 100 person-years) showed reduced incidence of UGIB compared with the non-GPA group (11.3 per 100 person-years) (p=.065). Conclusions: The prophylactic use of GPAs could reduce the risk of UGIB in patients receiving DOACs who have risk factors, such as concomitant use of antiplatelet agents or a history of peptic ulcer or UGIB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives:With the aging population, the number of elderly patients diagnosed with gastric cancer is increasing. However, determining treatment strategies for elderly patients with gastric cancer is controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the usefulness of surgical treatment on elderly patients aged ≥80 years with advanced gastric cancer. Methods:A total of 147 elderly patients who were diagnosed with advanced gastric cancer from August 2001 to December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. We compared the clinicopathological features and prognoses of 94 elderly patients (80–85 years) and 53 extreme-elderly patients (≥86 years) according to treatment modalities. Results:In the elderly group, the 3-year overall survival (OS) rates of the surgical resection group and supportive care group were 42.1% and 4.0%, respectively (p < .001). In the extreme-elderly group, the 3-year OS rates of the surgical resection group and supportive care group were 36.4% and 8.0%, respectively (p = .028). The post-operative mortality rate of the elderly group and extreme-elderly group was 5.6% and 9.1%, respectively. In the analysis of risk factors associated with survival, surgical resection was a significantly good prognostic factor in the elderly group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.277;p = .003) compared with supportive care. In the extreme-elderly group, surgical resection was associated with good prognosis but did not reach statistical significance (HR = 0.491;p = .099). Conclusions:These results suggest that elderly patients aged 80–85 years with advanced gastric cancer could expect a better prognosis with surgical resection. However, extreme-elderly patients aged ≥86 years should consider the risks and benefits of surgical treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. Limited data are available on the incidence and risk factors of colorectal cancer (CRC) in Asian patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Material and methods. Information on 5212 Korean patients with IBD (2414 with Crohn's disease [CD] and 2798 with ulcerative colitis [UC]) was retrieved from the IBD registry of Asan Medical Center. Data on CRC incidence for the entire Korean population were derived from the Korean Statistical Information Service. Results. During 39,951 person-years of follow-up (17,679 for CD and 22,272 for UC), 30 patients (12 with CD and 18 with UC) developed CRC. The standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of CRC was 6.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.10-10.48) for CD and 1.68 (95% CI, 1.00-2.66) for UC; it was 9.69 (95% CI, 5.01-16.93) for CD with colonic involvement and 4.31 (95% CI, 2.46-7.00) for extensive UC. The SIR was also increased in patients diagnosed with IBD at younger than 30 years old. CRC location was the low rectum in 11 of 12 CD patients (91.7%). The cumulative probability of rectal cancer was higher in CD patients with a perianal fistula than in those without a perianal fistula ( p = 0.02). Conclusions. A high prevalence of perianal fistulas in Korean CD patients may be the cause of the predominance of low rectal cancer in this population and the higher SIR of CRC in Koreans than in Westerners. In contrast, the SIR of CRC in Korean UC patients may be similar to that in Western UC patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]