Search

Embodied energy (EE) analysis has become an important area of energy research, in attempting to trace the direct and indirect energy requirements of products and services throughout their supply chain. Typically, input–output (I–O) models have been used to calculate EE because they are considered to be comprehensive in their analysis. However, a major deficiency of using I–O models is that they have inherent errors and therefore cannot be reliably applied to individual cases. Thus, there is a need for the ability to disaggregate an I–O model into its most important 'energy paths', for the purpose of integrating case-specific data. This paper presents a new hybrid method for conducting EE analyses for individual buildings, which retains the completeness of the I–O model. This new method is demonstrated by application to an Australian residential building. Only 52% of the energy paths derived from the I–O model were substituted using case-specific data. This indicates that previous system boundaries for EE studies of individual residential buildings are less than optimal. It is envisaged that the proposed method will provide construction professionals with more accurate and reliable data for conducting life cycle energy analysis of buildings. Furthermore, by analysing the unmodified energy paths, further data collection can be prioritized effectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Examines the embodied energy paths in an input-output tables and models. Definition of what an embodied energy is within the context of econometric analysis; Investigation of the Leontief inverse input-output matrix; Discussion of potential for embodies energy paths as the basis for a hybrid analysis of the Australian residential sector.