Search

A comparative study was conducted on Levitation Frame with Mid-set Air Spring (LFMAS) and Levitation Frame with End-set Air Spring (LFEAS). First of all, the work done by air spring force and by track excitation on two levitation frames were analysed, respectively, and the mechanism of the low dynamic interaction of LFMAS with guideway was explained theoretically; then, dynamics simulation and coupled vibration test on LFEAS and LFMAS were carried out using coupled vibration test bench of single levitation frame. Theoretical equations show that both the work done by the air spring forces and by track excitation on LFMAS are less than those on LFEAS under the same vibration condition, demonstrating that LFMAS has better levitation stability than LFEAS. Simulation and test results show that the fluctuation of levitation gap as well as the vibration acceleration of track beam platform, levitation frame and car-body of LFMAS are all smaller than those of LFEAS; with the increase of sine excitation frequency or vehicle speed, the superiority of LFMAS in dynamics performance is more obvious. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]