Search

AbstractBackground and Objectives: In geriatrics and dementia care, early diagnosis is crucial. We developed a dementia screening model using drawing features from clock drawing tests (CDT) and investigated the features contributing to the discrimination of dementia and its screening performance. Methods: This study included 129 older adults attending a dementia outpatient clinic. We obtained information on the diagnosis of dementia and CDT data from medical records and quantified 12 types of drawing features according to the Freedman scoring system. Based on the dementia diagnosis information, participants were assigned to two groups: 58 in the dementia diagnosis group and 71 in the non-diagnosis group. Using Boruta, an iterative feature selection algorithm, and a support vector machine, a machine learning method, we analyzed the drawing features contributing to dementia discrimination and evaluated discrimination performance. Results: Five types of drawing features were selected as contributors to discrimination, including “numbers in the correct position,” “minute target number indicated,” and “hand in correct proportion.” These features exhibited a discriminating sensitivity of 0.74 ± 0.16 and specificity of 0.74 ± 0.18 for detecting dementia. Conclusion: This study demonstrated a method for identifying individuals likely to be diagnosed with dementia among patients attending a dementia outpatient clinic using drawing features. The knowledge of drawing features contributing to dementia differentiation may assist healthcare practitioners in clinical reasoning and provide novel insights for clinical practice. In the future, we plan to develop a primary screening for dementia based on machine learning using CDT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The common requirement to set the time to "10 past 11" on the Clock Drawing Test is intended to elicit a stimulus bound response (SBR), in which the responder is "pulled" to the salient stimulus "10," resulting in hands set at "10 before 11." SBRs are considered markers of executive dysfunction, although this assumption has not yet been validated. We compared SBR and other time-setting errors on inhibitory control tests, hypothesizing that they represent related constructs. The role of semantic dysfunction in the formation of those errors was also investigated. We examined baseline test performance of participants with Mild Cognitive Impairment or a history of depression, and control participants, enrolled in a dementia prevention study. Among 258 participants, we identified clocks with SBRs (n = 16), other time errors (n = 22), or no errors at all (n = 42). Performance between the groups with SBRs and other time-setting errors did not differ on any of the executive tests, and both error groups performed significantly worse than the No Error group on the semantic tests. Control for covariates further supported semantic and executive components in time-setting errors. Both semantic and inhibitory control deficits may underlie time representation errors in general. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of the Clock Drawing Test (CDT) in discriminating Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and dementia from normal cognition. Additionally, its clinical utility in predicting the transition from normal cognition to MCI and dementia over the course of several years was explored. Method: In total, 1037 older adults (633 women) who completed the CDT in a baseline assessment were drawn from the population-based HELIAD cohort. Among these, 848 participants were identified as cognitively normal, 142 as having MCI and 47 with dementia during the baseline assessment. Of these individuals, 565 attended the follow-up assessment (mean interval: 3.21 years). ROC curve and binary logistic regression analyses were performed. Results: The CDT exhibited good diagnostic accuracy for the discrimination between dementia and normal cognition (AUC =.879, SN =.813, SP =.778, LR+ = 3.66, LR- =.240, <.001, d = 1.655) and acceptable diagnostic accuracy for the discrimination between dementia and MCI (AUC=.761, SN=.750, SP=.689, LR+ = 2.41, LR- =.362, p <.001, d = 1.003). We found limited diagnostic accuracy, however, for the discrimination between MCI and normal cognition (AUC =.686, SN =.764, SP =.502, LR+ = 1.53, LR- =.470, p <.001, d =.685). Moreover, the CDT significantly predicted the transition from normal cognition to dementia [Exp(B)= 1.257, p =.022], as well as the transition from MCI to normal cognition [Exp(B) = 1.334, p =.023] during the longitudinal investigation. Conclusions: The CDT is a neuropsychological test with acceptable diagnostic accuracy for the discrimination of dementia from MCI and normal cognition. Furthermore, it has an important predictive value for the transition from normal cognition to dementia and from MCI to normal cognition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The clock drawing test (CDT) is a widely used cognitive screening test. However, CDT performance is affected by education. This study examined an alternative, the Papadum test, designed for people with low levels of education/literacy. The association between education and test performance, correlation between CDT and Papadum test, and diagnostic accuracy of both CDT and Papadum tests were examined. Method: 89 healthy literate adults and 59 literate adults (all Bengali speaking) with a diagnosis of mild-moderate dementia from hospitals in Kolkata, India undertook the CDT and the Papadum test. Results: Education had a significant association with the CDT but not with the Papadum test. Across the whole sample there was a significant correlation between CDT and Papadum, but not within separate groups of healthy controls and patients. Diagnostic accuracy for the Papadum test was similar to that for CDT. Conclusions: Results highlight the strong influence that education has on CDT performance indicating that it is not suitable for those with low levels of literacy. The Papadum test could provide a viable alternative as a screening tool to the CDT for use with people who are illiterate or have low levels of education. Further validation studies are required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The present study aims to be the first to validate the Tuokko version of the Clock Drawing Test (CDT) and estimate its cutoff score after its translation into the Greek language and administration in the Greek population. One hundred and thirty-two individuals participated in this study [60 with Good Cognitive Health (GCH), 24 with Parkinson's Disease (PD), 24 with Parkinson's Disease Dementia (PDD) and 24 with Alzheimer's Disease (AD)]. The CDT was administered to all participants. Additionally, the cognitive and mental status of the sample were estimated through the use of the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS), Arizona Battery for Communication Disorders of Dementia (ABCD), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (H-NPI) and the Geriatric Depression Scale −15 (GDS-15). Statistically significant differences were found between all groups on the CDT, with AD patients having lower scores than all subgroups in the study. The CDT showed a high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.832). The ROC analysis provided a cutoff point equal to 4.00 (AUC: 0.821, p < 0.001) between the Cognitively Unimpaired Group (CUG: GCH and PD group) and the Cognitively Impaired Group (CIG: PPD and AD patients), 5.00 (AUC: 0.845, p < 0.001) between the GCH group and the PDD group, and 4.00 (AUC: 0.780, p < 0.001) between the GCH group and the AD group. Finally, the cutoff point between the PD group and the PDD group was 4.00 (AUC: 0.896, p < 0.005), and 3.00 (AUC: 0.899, p < 0.001) between the PD group and the AD group. Significant positive Pearson's correlations were observed between CDT and MMSE (r = 0.808, p < 0.001), CDT and AMTS (r = 0.688, p < 0.001), CDT and ABCD (r = 0.770, p < 0.001), CDT and the ABCD Visuospatial Construction subdomain (r = 0.880, p < 0.001); while a negative correlation was found between CDT and IADL (r = −0.627, p < 0.001) between the CUG and the CIG groups. Given the results obtained, the CDT appears to be a clinically valid screening instrument for the assessment of visuospatial abilities, with high reliability in Greek populations with cognitive impairment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Delirium is a common neurocognitive syndrome among hospitalised older adults. The clock drawing test (CDT) is a relatively simple bedside test of cognitive function. This systematic review and meta-analysis examine the accuracy of the CDT in identifying delirium in hospitalised older adults. Methods: PRISMA guidelines were used to report the identified studies. Pubmed, SCOPUS, and Ovid and EBSCO platforms (including MEDLINE ®, PsycINFO, PsycEXTRA, EMCARE, CINAHL and EMBASE databases) were searched. Studies were assessed for methodological quality using the Downs and Black Tool. Data were extracted regarding the number of delirious/not delirious, number with normal and abnormal CDT, age, and MMSE scores, and information regarding CDT scoring, criteria for diagnosis of delirium and setting of the study. Analysis was carried out with the "Mada" and "Metatron" packages of R software. Results: Fifteen studies were examined. The number of participants was 2199, of whom 597 (27.15%) were diagnosed with delirium. The overall sensitivity of CDT in the absence of any formal cognitive test was 0.76 (0.58–0.87) with specificity of 0.70 (0.51–0.83). When the MMSE was taken into account, the specificity and sensitivity reduced to 0.51. Diagnostic criteria for delirium, scoring method of CDT, age of participants and setting significantly (p < 0.05) affect the sensitivity and specificity of the CDT. Conclusion: Although, the CDT is generally considered to be a simple and easy to administer screening tool for cognitive impairment in older hospitalised adults, when a more formal cognitive test is used its sensitivity and specificity to detect delirium is low. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The Clock Drawing Test (CDT) is commonly used as a screening tool for the assessment of dementia. The association between the CDT in acute stroke and long-term functional and cognitive outcomes in this population is unknown. The present prospective study is the first to examine if CDT scores in the acute stage after stroke are related to long-term outcomes and to compare the predictive ability of two scoring systems in a large sample of stroke patients. Method: A total of 340 patients admitted to an acute stroke unit were included in the present study. Separate stepwise multiple linear regression analyses were performed with eight independent variables (demographic/pre-stroke variables – age, sex, premorbid functioning; stroke-related variables – stroke severity, localization; cognitive variables – Orientation Test, CDT [2 scoring systems]), and four dependent variables administered one year post-stroke (Barthel Index, modified Rankin Scale, Reintegration to Normal Living index, Global Deterioration Scale). Results: Although both CDT scoring methods were related to all long-term outcome measures, the more comprehensive scoring system was the only baseline variable that significantly explained the variance in outcome measures in all four multiple regression models. Conclusion: Performance on the CDT in acute stroke is related to long-term outcomes including patients' degree of independence in performing activities of daily living, the degree to which they achieved reintegration into daily occupations, and the degree of cognitive decline observed one-year post-stroke. Future studies are needed to clarify the nature of the relationship between different CDT scoring systems and post-stroke outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The clock drawing test (CDT) is one of the worldwide most used screening tests for Alzheimer's disease (AD). MRI studies have identified temporo-parietal regions being involved in CDT impairment. However, the contributions of specific hippocampal subfields and adjacent extrahippocampal structures to CDT performance in AD and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) have not been investigated so far. It is unclear whether morphological alterations or CDT score, or a combination of both, are able to predict AD. Methods: 38 AD patients, 38 MCI individuals and 31 healthy controls underwent neuropsychological assessment and MRI at 3 Tesla. FreeSurfer 5.3 was used to perform hippocampal parcellation. We used a collection of statistical methods to better understand the relationship between CDT and hippocampal formation. We also tested the clinical feasibility of this relationship when predicting AD. Results: Impaired CDT performance in AD was associated with widespread atrophy of the cornu ammonis, presubiculum, and subiculum, whereas MCI subjects showed CDT-related alterations of the CA4-dentate gyrus and subiculum. CDT correlates in AD and MCI showed regional and quantitative overlap. Importantly, CDT score was the best predictor of AD. Conclusions: Our findings lend support for an involvement of different hippocampal subfields in impaired CDT performance in AD and MCI. CDT seems to be more efficient than subfield imaging for predicting AD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The Clock Drawing Test (CDT) is widely used as a cognitive screening tool. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of gender, age, and education on CDT scores in a sample of elderly, community-dwelling adults in China. Methods: The sample was derived from a cross-sectional survey, "The study on the early screening methods for senile dementia." It included Chinese-speaking persons 65 years of age or older with normal cognitive functioning. All the participants underwent neuropsychological assessments, including the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the CDT. The CDT was administered and scored using Shulman's methodology. The effects of gender, age, and education on CDT performance were analyzed. Results: The sample contained 440 males and 445 females, ranging from 65 to 93 years of age, with a mean age of 74.94 ± 6.17 years old. The mean CDT and MMSE scores were 4.81 ± 0.54 and 28.79 ± 1.35, respectively. CDT performance was significantly different among age groups (χ2 = 22.85, p <.01) and educational levels (χ2 = 6.94, p =.03). However, there was no significant difference in CDT scores between males and females (t = 0.56, p =.57). The gender difference remained non-significant when the sample was divided according to age group and educational level. Conclusions: The study provides preliminary normative data on the CDT for the older population of China. CDT performance was significantly influenced by age and education, which must be taken into account when using the CDT as a cognitive screening tool in the Chinese population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The Clock Drawing Test (CDT) is frequently used to screen for cognitive impairment, however, normative data for Rouleau et al.'s scoring system are scarce. The present study aims to provide norms for Rouleau et al.'s scoring system that are tailored to Quebec French-speaking mid- and older aged healthy adults. Methods: Six researchers from various research centers across the Province of Quebec (Canada) sent anonymous data for 593 (391 women) healthy community-dwelling volunteers (age range: 43-93 years; education range: 5-23 years) who completed the CDT 'drawing on command' version. This command version (setting the clock hands to 11:10, without a pre-drawn circle) was administrated as part of a more extensive neuropsychological assessment, or along with cognitive screening instruments. Each drawn clock was scored according to the quantitative criteria set by Rouleau et al.'s scoring system. Results: CDT scores were significantly correlated with age (r(592) = −.132, p = .001) and years of education (r(592) = .116, p = .005), but not with sex (r(592) = .065, p = .112). Since data were skewed towards higher test scores, the percentiles method was used for analysis. Percentile ranks stratified by age and education are presented. Conclusion: These normative data for Rouleau et al.'s scoring system will contribute towards adequately screening for cognitive decline in Quebec French-speaking healthy adults, by also taking into account individual characteristics such as age and education. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The present work addresses the identification and qualitative assessment of errors that appear in a free-drawn clock-drawing test representing the time 8:20 in a sample of 455 children and adolescents with neurological diseases and their controls. The authors sought to verify whether the occurrence of particular errors in the clock drawings significantly differentiates the clinical groups. For statistical evaluation of the results, we applied correspondence analysis and cluster analysis. The results of the study showed that three types of errors played an important role in the differentiation of the groups: spatial neglect, mirror reflection, and phonological depletion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The Clock Drawing Test (CDT) is widely used as a screening tool for discriminating cognitively normal individuals from patients with mild dementia. The aim of present study was to provide normative values for a 10-point quantitative scoring system proposed by Rouleau and colleagues (1992), including CDT total score and subscales score assessing representation of clock face (RC), layout of numbers (LN), and position of hands (PH), in a large sample of Italian healthy individuals. Method: Eight hundred and seventy-two Italian healthy participants (483 women; age range 20-94 years) with educational level from primary school to university underwent CDT and Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). Results: Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that age and education significantly influenced CDT total score and its subscale scores. Moreover, a significant effect of gender was found only in RC subscale. From the derived linear equation, a correction grid for raw scores was built. Inferential cut-off values were estimated using a non-parametric technique and equivalent scores (ES) were computed. Correlation analysis showed a weakly significant correlation between adjusted CDT total score and adjusted MMSE scores. Conclusions: The present study provided normative data for the Rouleau and colleagues version of CDT in an Italian sample, useful for clinical and research purposes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives:Delirium is common neuropsychiatric condition among elderly inpatients. The clock drawing test (CDT) has been used widely as bedside screening tool in assessing cognitive impairment in elderly people. Previous studies which evaluate its usefulness in delirium reported conflicting results. The objective of this study was to evaluate the utility of CDT to detect delirium in elderly medical patients. Method:Prospective, observational, longitudinal study. All acute medical admissions 70 years of age and above were approached within 72 hours of admission for recruitment. Patients eligible for inclusion were assessed four times, twice weekly during admission. Assessment included Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), Delirium Rating Scale (DRS-98R), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE) II, and CDT. Data was analysed using a linear mixed effect model. Results:Three hundred and twenty-three assessments with the CDT were performed on 200 subjects (50% male, mean age 81.13; standard deviation: 6.45). The overall rate of delirium (CAM+) during hospitalisation was 23%. There was a significant negative correlation between the CDT and DRS-R98 scores (Pearson correlationr= −0.618,p< 0.001), CDT and CAM (Spearman's rho = −0.402,p< 0.001) and CDT and total MoCA score (Pearson'sr= 0.767,p< 0.001). However, when the data were analysed longitudinally controlling for all the factors, we found that cognitive function and age were significant factors associated with CDT scores (p< .0001): neither the presence nor the severity of delirium had an additional significant effect on the CDT. Conclusion:CDT score reflects cognitive impairment, independently of the presence or severity of delirium. The CDT is not a suitable test for delirium in hospitalised elderly patients. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Clock Drawing Test performance was examined alongside other neuropsychological tests in mild cognitive impairment (MCI). We tested the hypothesis that clock-drawing errors are related to executive impairment. The current research examined 86 patients with MCI for whom, in prior research, cluster analysis was used to sort patients into dysexecutive (dMCI,n = 22), amnestic (aMCI,n = 13), and multidomain (mMCI,n = 51) subtypes. First, principal components analysis (PCA) and linear regression examined relations between clock-drawing errors and neuropsychological test performance independent of MCI subtype. Second, between-group differences were assessed with analysis of variance (ANOVA) where MCI subgroups were compared to normal controls (NC). PCA yielded a 3-group solution. Contrary to expectations, clock-drawing errors loaded with lower performance on naming/lexical retrieval, rather than with executive tests. Regression analyses found increasing clock-drawing errors to command were associated with worse performance only on naming/lexical retrieval tests. ANOVAs revealed no differences in clock-drawing errors between dMCI versus mMCI or aMCI versus NCs. Both the dMCI and mMCI groups generated more clock-drawing errors than the aMCI and NC groups in the command condition. In MCI, language-related skills contribute to clock-drawing impairment. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

This study presents a reliable, short and practical version of the Clock Drawing Test (CDT) for clinical use and examines its diagnostic accuracy in mild Alzheimer’s disease versus elderly nonpatients. Clock drawings from 231 participants were scored independently by four clinical neuropsychologists blind to diagnostic classification. The interrater agreement of individual scoring criteria was analyzed and items with poor or moderate reliability were excluded. The classification accuracy of the resulting scoring system – the six-item CDT – was examined. We explored the effect of further reducing the number of scoring items on classification accuracy and estimated classification accuracy associated with performances deviating from the optimal cutoff score. At a cutoff of 5/6, the six-item CDT had a sensitivity (SN) of 0.65 and a specificity of 0.80. Stepwise removal of up to three items reduced SN slightly. Classification accuracy associated with a score of four or less out of six was very high. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Objectives. Methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) patients may achieve up to a 2-week privilege of methadone take-home doses (THD), which is associated with considerable responsibility. MMT patients are characterized as having poor sleep quality and low cognitive states. We studied sleep indices and cognitive status with respect to THD privileges. Methods. A sample of 123 MMT patients stratified by THD groups was studied. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and the cognitive Clock Drawing Test (CDT) were performed. Results. Thirty-one of 123 patients never had any THD and 92 did (25 had the maximum of 2 weeks). The never THD had history of longer duration of opiate usage and a shorter period in MMT. They had the highest rates of poor sleep (80.6%, PSQI > 5), daily sleepiness ('fall asleep while talking') (41.9%), and impaired cognitive status (58.1%, CDT < 3), while those who had 2-week privileges had the lowest (56, 8, and 28%, respectively). Logistic regression characterized THD patients as no-benzodiazepine and no-cocaine, short opiate usage duration, low ADHD scores, and no cognitive impairment (CDT = 3) and its interaction with treatment duration. Conclusion. Privileges that reflect patients' abstinence and rehabilitation were also expanded to be associated with better cognitive states. These finding confirm the THD dispensing performance. Including CDT as part of the decision for dispensing THD may be considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The Clock Drawing Test is a frequently used cognitive screening test with several scoring systems in elderly populations. We compare simple and complex scoring systems and evaluate the usefulness of the combination of the Clock Drawing Test with the Mini-Mental State Examination to detect patients with mild cognitive impairment. Method: Patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (n = 48) and age- and education-matched controls (n = 48) underwent neuropsychological examinations, including the Clock Drawing Test and the Mini-Mental State Examination. Clock drawings were scored by three blinded raters using one simple (6-point scale) and two complex (17- and 18-point scales) systems. The sensitivity and specificity of these scoring systems used alone and in combination with the Mini-Mental State Examination were determined. Results: Complex scoring systems, but not the simple scoring system, were significant predictors of the amnestic mild cognitive impairment diagnosis in logistic regression analysis. At equal levels of sensitivity (87.5%), the Mini-Mental State Examination showed higher specificity (31.3%, compared with 12.5% for the 17-point Clock Drawing Test scoring scale). The combination of Clock Drawing Test and Mini-Mental State Examination scores increased the area under the curve (0.72; p <.001) and increased specificity (43.8%), but did not increase sensitivity, which remained high (85.4%). Conclusions: A simple 6-point scoring system for the Clock Drawing Test did not differentiate between healthy elderly and patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment in our sample. Complex scoring systems were slightly more efficient, yet still were characterized by high rates of false-positive results. We found psychometric improvement using combined scores from the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Clock Drawing Test when complex scoring systems were used. The results of this study support the benefit of using combined scores from simple methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The decline in frontal cognitive functions contributes to alterations of gait and increases the risk of falls in patients with dementia, a category which included Alzheimer's disease (AD). The objective of the present study was to compare the gait parameters and the risk of falls among patients at different stages of AD, and to relate these variables with cognitive functions. This is a cross-sectional study with 23 patients with mild and moderate AD. The Clinical Dementia Rating was used to classify the dementia severity. The kinematic parameters of gait (cadence, stride length, and stride speed) were analyzed under two conditions: (a) single task (free gait) and (b) dual task (walking and counting down). The risk of falls was evaluated using the Timed Up-and-Go test. The frontal cognitive functions were evaluated using the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB), the Clock Drawing Test (CDT) and the Symbol Search Subtest. The patients who were at the moderate stage suffered reduced performance in their stride length and stride speed in the single task and had made more counting errors in the dual task and still had a higher fall risk. Both the mild and the moderate patients exhibited significant decreases in stride length, stride speed and cadence in the dual task. Was detected a significant correlation between CDT, FAB, and stride speed in the dual task condition. We also found a significant correlation between subtest Similarities, FAB and cadence in the dual task condition. The dual task produced changes in the kinematic parameters of gait for the mild and moderate AD patients and the gait alterations are related to frontal cognitive functions, particularly executive functions. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Background: The Clock Drawing Test (CDT) is a valid screening tool for the evaluation of cognitive decline. This study aimed to compute standardized norms for the Freedman version of the CDT in a population of 248 healthy Italian individuals aged from 20 to 89 years. Method: The effects of age, education, and gender on performance were assessed. Three conditions were administered: free-drawn clock (FD), which required participants to draw the contour, numbers, hands, and center of the clock; predrawn clock (PD), in which numbers, hands, and center had to be included in a predrawn contour; examiner-drawn clock (ED), in which only hands and center had to be inserted in a template including a predrawn contour and numbers. Scores for each of the single conditions and a total score were calculated. Results: Age had no effect on the FD condition, whereas a significant effect of age was found for the PD and ED conditions and the total score. Gender and education had no influence on any of the scores. Correction grids, cutoffs, and equivalent scores were computed. Conclusion: Standardized norms for the Freedman version of the CDT were collected in a large sample of healthy individuals. No adjustments were required for scores on the free-drawn condition, whereas raw scores on the predrawn and examiner-drawn conditions and the total score needed adjustments to account for age effects. The availability of standardized norms for this version of the CDT could increase the use of this comprehensive tool in the detection of dementia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients without sensory neglect might demonstrate a spatial deviation when drawing. To better understand the mechanism of this deviation, we examined a 61-year-old woman with probable posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) who on imaging showed right hemisphere atrophy and dysfunction. When drawing a clock she correctly made a circle, but when writing the numbers deviated to the left. A blindfolded midsagittal plane pointing test revealed that her leftward deviation was action-intentional rather than perceptual-attentional. This action-intentional deviation was made manifest by altering visual feedback such as having her focus her attention on the clock numbers [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Retinopathy status as a screening method to predict cognitive health is limited. The objective of this study was to examine the association between retinopathy and lowered cognitive performance in a Canadian First Nations population. Methods: Eligible individuals were assessed by the Clock Drawing Test (CDT) and the Trail Making Test Parts A and B, which were combined into an executive function score (TMT-exec). Digital fundus photographs were taken for both eyes to assess retinopathy. Anthropometric, vascular and metabolic risk factors were assessed by interview, clinical examinations and blood tests. Carotid atherosclerosis was assessed by Doppler ultrasonography. Results: Retinopathy was detected in 7.1% of the population. Individuals classified as having a previous history of cardiovascular disease, insulin resistance and diabetes were more likely to have retinopathy. No other cardiovascular risk factors were associated. In unadjusted analysis, there were no associations between retinopathy and lowered cognitive performance (CDT, odds ratio [OR]: 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30-2.53; TMT-exec, OR: 1.79, 95% CI: 0.60-5.33). Multivariable adjusted analysis also showed no associations, although sample size may be limiting. Conclusions: Retinopathy was not associated with lowered cognitive performance. Associations for microvascular risk factors suggest a panel of cognitive tests is needed for future studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The Clock Drawing Test (CDT) is commonly used for cognitive screening. The purpose of this study is to develop normative data for the CDT for the Japanese community-dwelling population, using the method of Freedman. This study also investigates the effect of demographic factors on the performance of the subjects in this task. Methods: We administered the CDT and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) to 873 volunteers. Using a multiple linear regression analysis, we found a gender difference in the free-drawn condition. Results: A detrimental effect of age was observed in the free-drawn and pre-drawn conditions. The years of education affected the CDT in the examiner 2 condition. Correlations of the MMSE with each of the five conditions of the CDT were significant, further validating this test. Conclusions: Our study provides preliminary normative data for the Japanese population stratified by the age and level of education. However, interpretation of our results was hampered by the large variability in the performance of the subjects and the possibility of a selection bias. Thus, additional studies will be necessary to further characterise the CDT scores for the Japanese community. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]