Search

Purpose: Breast brachytherapy (BB) represents an important radiation therapy modality in modern breast cancer treatments. Currently, BB is mainly used for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), local boost after whole breast radiation therapy (WBRT), and as salvage re-irradiation after second lumpectomy (APBrl). Two multi-catheter interstitial brachytherapy (MIB) techniques can be offered: intra-operative (IOB) and post-operative (POB) brachytherapy. The aim of this article was to summarize current available data on these two different brachytherapy approaches for breast cancer. Material and methods: A literature search was performed, and different experiences published by BB expert teams were analyzed and compared. These two different brachytherapy approaches for breast cancer have also been presented and discussed during meetings of the GEC-ESTRO BCWG. In addition, expert recommendations were defined. Results: A comprehensive description and practical comparison of both the techniques, i.e., IOB and POB, considering the latest available published data were presented. Different technical, logistic, and clinical aspects of both the methods were thoroughly examined and analyzed. This detailed comparison of the two breast brachytherapy techniques was supported by scientific data from extensive experience of experts, facilitating an objective analysis that, to our knowledge, has not been previously published. Conclusions: Based on the comprehensive analysis of both the brachytherapy techniques available, this article serves as a valuable resource to guide breast teams in selecting the optimal BB technique (POB or IOB), considering hospital environment, multi-disciplinary collaboration, and patient logistics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We investigated the long-term oncological outcome of high-dose-rate (HDR) multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy (MIB) for adjuvant accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) after breast conserving surgery in Japanese patients. Material and methods: Between June 2002 and October 2011, 86 breast cancer patients were treated at National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital (trial number of the local institutional review board, 0329). Median age was 48 years (range, 26-73 years). Eighty patients had invasive and 6 patients non-invasive ductal carcinoma. Tumor stage distribution was pT0 in 2, pTis in 6, pT1 in 55, pT2 in 22, and pT3 in one patient, respectively. Twenty-seven patients had close/positive resection margins. Total physical HDR dose was 36-42 Gy in 6-7 fractions. Results: At a median follow-up of 119 months (range, 13-189 months), the 10-year local control (LC) and overall survival rate was 93% and 88%, respectively. Concerning the 2009 Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie-European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology risk stratification scheme, the 10-year LC rate was 100%, 100%, and 91% for patients considered as low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk, respectively. According to the 2018 American Brachytherapy Society risk stratification scheme, the 10-year LC rate was 100% and 90% for patients 'acceptable' and 'unacceptable' for APBI, respectively. Wound complications were observed in 7 patients (8%). Risk factors for wound complications were the omission of prophylactic antibiotics during MIB, open cavity implantation, and V100 ≥ 190 cc. No grade ≥ 3 late complications (CTCVE version 4.0) were observed. Conclusions: Adjuvant APBI using MIB is associated with favorable long-term oncological outcomes in Japanese patients for low-risk, intermediate-risk, and acceptable groups of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To identify patient, tumor, and treatment-related factors, which predict cosmesis in breast cancer survivors treated with adjuvant whole breast irradiation (WBI) plus high-dose-rate (HDR) multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy (MIBT) boost after breast conservation surgery. Material and methods: At least 12 months after completion of radiotherapy, cosmetic outcomes were measured both objectively with BCCT.core software (using a front view digital photograph), and subjectively according to Harvard's criteria. MIBT dose fractionation regimen was 13.6 Gy/4 fractions (bid). To evaluate the correlation between cosmetic scores and dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters, WBI and MIBT plans were retrospectively analyzed, and ipsilateral skin and breast biologically equivalent dosimetric indices were recorded (a/ß = 3 Gy). A multivariate ordinal logistic regression model was used for statistical analysis. Results: Twenty-eight consecutive patients were enrolled into this study. The median time from completion of radiation therapy to cosmesis scoring was 18 months. In evaluation with BCCT.core software, no patient was scored as excellent. Cosmesis was good in 18%, fair in 50%, and poor in 32% of patients. According to Harvard's scale, 10.5% of patients had excellent cosmesis, and 43%, 28.5%, and 18% of patients had good, fair, and poor scores, respectively. In univariate analysis, patients with higher absolute MIBT V29Gy (cc), those treated with irradiation of regional lymphatics (odds ratio = 5), and patients with larger breast volumes had statistically significant lower Harvard's scores. In the multivariate model, none of the mentioned factors remained statistically significant, except for a trend for poorer cosmesis in patients with higher absolute MIBT V29Gy (p-value = 0.066). Conclusions: Based on the results of this study, MIBT breast V29Gy, regional nodal irradiation, and larger breast volumes are the potential factors, which could predict cosmesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare patient-reported quality of life (QOL) scores after accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using interstitial brachytherapy vs. external beam whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT) for breast cancer. Material and methods: Women with breast cancer treated with WBRT or APBI after breast conservation surgery were enrolled in this prospective study. Single cross-sectional QOL assessment was performed using EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR-23 questionnaires. Patients treated with APBI were propensity-score matched to similar cohort of patients treated with WBRT. QOL scores were analyzed for the entire unmatched cohort and compared between the two matched cohorts using Student's two-tailed t-test. P-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, and a 10-point difference between mean scores was considered clinically meaningful. Results: A total of 64 APBI patients were matched with 99 WBRT patients out of the entire study cohort of 320 cases. QOL scores for functional scales of QLQ-C30 were similar between the two groups for both matched and unmatched cohorts, while symptom scores of QLQ-C30 did not show any clinically significant difference. Functional scales of BR-23 did not show any clinical or statistically significant difference. Among symptom scales of BR-23, scores were similar for APBI and WBRT groups except for a worse score of "upset by hair loss" sub-scale in the brachytherapy group of the matched cohort (51.9 vs. 22.7, p = 0.006). Conclusions: Patients undergoing APBI reported similar QOL compared to WBRT when matched for various factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate our institutional experience of minimally invasive tumor bed implantation (MITBI) during breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to deliver peri-operative high-dose-rate brachytherapy (PHDRBT) as accelerated minimal breast irradiation (AMBI) or anticipated boost (A-PHDRBT-boost). Material and methods: Patients older than 40, with clinical and radiological unifocal DCIS < 3 cm were considered potential candidates for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) and were implanted during BCS using MITBItechnique. Patients who in final pathology reports showed free margins and no other microscopic tumor foci, received AMBI with PHDRBT (3.4 Gy BID in 5 days). Patients with adverse features received A-PHDRBT-boost with post-operative external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Results: Forty-one patients were implanted, and 36 were treated and analyzed. According to final pathology, 24 (67%) patients were suitable for AMBI and 12 (33%) were qualified for A-PHDRBT-boost. Reoperation rate for those with clear margins was 16.6% (6/36); this rate increased to 33% (4/12) for G3 histology, and 66% (4/6) were rescued using AMBI. Early complications were documented in 5 patients (14%). With a median follow-up of 97 (range, 42-138) months, 5-year rates of local, elsewhere, locoregional, and distant control were all 97.2%. 5-year ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence rates (IBTR) were 5.6% (2/36), 8.3% (2/24) for AMBI, and 0% (0/12) for A-PHDRBT-boost patients. Both instances of IBTR were confirmed G3 tumors in pre-operative biopsies; no IBTR was documented in G1-2 tumors. Cosmetic outcomes were excellent/good in 96% of AMBI vs. 67% in A-PHDRBT-boost (p = 0.034). Conclusions: The MITBI-PHDRBT program allows selection of patients with excellent prognoses (G1-2 DCIS with negative margins and no multifocality), for whom AMBI could be a good alternative with low recurrence rate, decrease of unnecessary radiation, treatment logistics improvement, and over-treatment reduction. Patients whose pre-operative biopsy showed G3 tumor, presents with inferior local control and more risk of reoperation due to positive margins. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: AccuBoost is a complex non-invasive brachytherapy procedure for breast treatment. This technique requires a radiation oncologist to manually select applicator grid position and size by overlaying transparencies over a mammographic image to encompass surgical clips and resected tumor bed. An algorithm was developed in MATLAB™ to automate the selection of round applicators based on surgical clip position. Material and methods: A total of 42 mammograms belonging to 10 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Images were pre-processed by masking imprinted localization grid and regions around the grid. A threshold was applied to isolate high-intensity pixels and generate a binary image. A set of morphological operations including region dilation, filling, clearing border structures, and erosion were performed to segment the different regions. A support vector machine classification model was trained to categorize segmented regions as either surgical clips or miscellaneous objects based on different region properties (area, perimeter, eccentricity, circularity, minor axis length, and intensity-derived quantities). Applicator center position was determined by calculating the centroid of detected clips. Size of the applicator was determined with the smallest circle that encompassed all clips with an isotropic 1.0 cm margin. Results: The clip identification model classified 946 regions, with a sensitivity of 96.6% and a specificity of 98.2%. Applicator position was correctly predicted for 20 of 42 fractions and was within 0.5 cm of physician-selected position for 33 of 42 fractions. Applicator size was correctly predicted for 25 out of 42 fractions. Conclusions: The proposed algorithm provided a method to quantitatively determine applicator position and size for AccuBoost treatments, and may serve as a tool for independent verifications. The discrepancy between physician-selected and algorithm-predicted determinations of applicator position and size suggests that the methodology may be further improved by considering radiomic features of breast tissue in addition to clip position. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate clinical results of catheter-based interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) as adjuvant treatment in previously irradiated recurrent breast cancer. Material and methods: Between January 2011 and September 2015, 31 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed recurrent breast cancer after conservative surgery and conventional whole breast radiotherapy, were retreated with a second conservative surgical resection and reirradiated with adjuvant interstitial HDR-BT. None of the brachytherapy implant was performed during the quadrantectomy procedure. A dose of 34 Gy in 10 fractions, 2 fractions per day, with a minimal interval of 6 hours was delivered. Results: At the time of the implant, the median age of patients was 59.7 years (range, 39.3-74.9 years). The median time from first treatment until BT for local recurrence was 11.9 years (range, 2.5-27.8 years). The median interval between salvage surgery and BT was 3.6 months (range, 1-8.2 months). No acute epidermitis or soft tissue side effects higher than grade 2 were recorded, with good cosmetic results in all patients. Most of the patients presented grade 1-2 late side effects. Only one patient developed grade 3 liponecrosis. After a median follow-up of 73.7 months (range, 28.8-102.4 months), the overall survival and cancer specific survival were 87.1% and 90.3%, respectively; 5-year local control and 5-year progression-free survival rate were 90.3% and 83.9%, respectively. Conclusions: Our preliminary analysis showed that HDR-BT is a feasible treatment for partial breast reirradiation offering very low complications rate and fast procedure. Higher patients' cohort is warranted in order to define the role of this treatment modality in the breast conservative management of local recurrence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy's first issue of 2024 features a range of articles on various topics related to brachytherapy. The issue includes clinical papers on prostate cancer, a physics contribution on MRI-guided surface brachytherapy, and educational articles on breast cancer and gynecological settings. The articles provide valuable insights into different techniques, challenges, and potential benefits of brachytherapy in these areas. The editor-in-chief recommends reviewing previously published communications on these topics as well. [Extracted from the article]

Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of post-operative partial breast re-irradiation with multi-catheter brachytherapy after second breast conserving therapy (BCT) in patients with small, low-risk ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). Material and methods: Between 2008 and 2018, 19 consecutive patients with low-risk IBTR (max. rpT1 cN0 cM0, Her2 negative, preferably positive hormone receptor status) who refused mastectomy were treated with salvage lumpectomy, followed by post-operative partial breast re-irradiation with multi-catheter brachytherapy. Eight patients were irradiated using PDR brachytherapy (49.8-50.4 Gy in pulses of 0.5-0.7 Gy) and 11 patients using HDR brachytherapy (34.2 Gy in fractions of 3.8 Gy or 32 Gy in fractions of 4 Gy). All patients had undergone prior BCT for their primary tumor, followed by adjuvant whole breast radiotherapy. Local control (LC), locoregional control (LRC), overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) as well as toxicity were evaluated in the present study. Results: After a median follow-up of 65 months following IBTR (18-120 months), only one second IBTR in 19 patients was diagnosed 77 months after re-irradiation, resulting in a LC rate of 100% at 5 years. DFS and OS rates were both 100% at 5 years following re-irradiation. Except for the above mentioned second IBTR, no regional or distant relapse was recorded. Regarding toxicity, 63% of patients developed adverse events (CTCAE grade ≤ 2), with fibrosis detected in 37% (7/19) of patients, necrosis in 11% (2/19), hyperpigmentation in 47% (9/19), and telangiectasia in 11% (2/19), respectively. No patient showed a high-grade (CTCAE grade ≥ 3) adverse event. Conclusions: In case of small, low-risk IBTR, adjuvant re-irradiation using multi-catheter brachytherapy is a feasible, safe, and effective treatment method after repeated lumpectomy, and an alternative to mastectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We evaluated agreement between subjective and objective methods of cosmesis scoring in an accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) cohort. Material and methods: Consecutive women treated with APBI using interstitial brachytherapy reported for clinical follow-up every 6 months. Single cross-sectional assessment of the breast cosmesis was done by a radiation oncologist (subjective method) using Harvard scale and by photographic assessment using BCCT.core (Breast Cancer Conservative Treatment. Cosmetic results, version 3.1) software (objective method) at 18-36 months post-APBI. The agreement between subjective and objective methods for the overall score as well as individual subjective/objective subdomains was computed using kappa statistics. ANOVA was used to test the correlation between objective indices and subjective subdomains. Results: The agreement between the subjective (physician) and objective assessment was good with a kappa of 0.673. Overall, 77 (98.7%) patients were satisfied with the overall outcomes of breast conservation therapy. The kappa agreement between physician and patient scoring was 0.457 (95% CI: 0.240-0.674). Among the subjective subdomains, location of the nipple areola complex (NAC) had good agreement with both the overall subjective and objective score, with the kappa of 0.778 and 0.547, respectively. In the objective indices, BCE (breast compliance evaluation), LBC (lower breast contour), and UNR (unilateral nipple retraction) correlated significantly with the subjective subdomains: location of the NAC, breast size, and shape (p < 0.05 for all indices). Conclusions: Good agreement exists for overall cosmetic outcomes measured by subjective and objective methods. Location of the NAC, breast size and shape are the most important parameters determining cosmetic outcomes irrespective of the method of assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: In partial-breast irradiation (PBI), accurate lumpectomy cavity (LC) delineation is critical. Seroma-based delineation (SBD) using computed tomography (CT) with clips remains uncertain, causing an expansion of the LC and planning target volume (PTV). In catheter-based delineation (CBD), the implanted catheters were used as reference markers for LC delineation in multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy (MIB). Material and methods: Between October 2008 and October 2018, 513 patients who underwent MIB-PBI were examined. In CBD, anatomical relations of LC to catheters were recorded. In randomly selected 22 CBD cases, the LC volume and PTV were retrospectively recontoured on SBD, and the relationship between the contribution of CBD and cavity visuality was evaluated. The LC volume and PTV before and after the introduction of CBD were compared. Results: The mean LC volumes based on SBD and CBD were 19.1 cm³ and 14.1 cm³, respectively (p < 0.001). The mean PTVs based on SBD and CBD were 47.9 cm³ and 35.7 cm3, respectively (p < 0.0001). More reductions in the LC volume (5.1 cm3) (p < 0.05) and PTV (7.7 cm3) (p = 0.13) were observed in the poorly visible LC than in the visible LC. The LC volume and PTV before the introduction of CBD (n = 411) were compared with those after introduction (n = 102). Significant reductions were observed in the LC volume (5.9 cm3) (p < 0.0001) after the introduction of CBD; moreover, PTV tended to be reduced (3.9 cm3) (p = 0.17). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We initiated the first multi-institutional prospective study of accelerated partial breast irradiation for early breast cancer in Japan. Our early clinical results showed that the treatment methods were technically reproducible between institutions and showed excellent disease control at a median follow-up of 26 months in our previous report. At present, total 46 patients from six institutions underwent the treatment regimen from October 2009 to December 2011, and the median follow-up time was 60 months (range, 57-67 months). In 46 patients, we experienced one patient who had rib fracture as a late complication. The dose-volume histogram (DVH) result of this patient was analyzed. The D0.01cc, D0.1cc, and D1cc values of the patient were 913, 817, and 664 cGy per fraction, respectively. These values were the highest values in 46 patients. The average D0.01cc, D0.1cc, and D1cc values of the other 45 patients were 546, 500, and 419, respectively, cGy per fraction. From this result, DVH values showing high-dose irradiated volume (D0.01cc, D0.1cc, and D1cc) seem to be a good predictive factor of rib fracture for accelerated partial breast irradiation. However, further investigation is necessary because of the small number of patients investigated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to report clinical outcomes in patients treated with accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), stratified as per molecular subtype and American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology/Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie and European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ASTRO/GEC-ESTRO) patient selection criteria in order to determine whether molecular subtype should be recommended as one of the selection criteria for APBI. Material and methods: 157 early-stage breast cancers patients, treated with APBI using multi-catheter interstitial brachytherapy with = 6 months follow-up were included. Molecular subtype was assigned based on estrogen/progesterone receptor (ER/PR), Her2neu and tumor grade. Patients were stratified into ASTRO and GEC-ESTRO risk groups, as per updated ASTRO consensus statement (CS) and GEC-ESTRO recommendation, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the time to event data of clinical outcomes. Results: With a median follow-up of 35 months, local control (LC) and locoregional control (LRC) were not significantly different among the different molecular subtypes (p = 0.19, p = 0.41, respectively). None of the APBI guidelines predicted risk of local or locoregional recurrence. Re-analyzing the data by replacing ER status with molecular subtype in the ASTRO-CS did not show any significant difference in LC/LRC across the various categories. Her2neu subtype was associated with significantly lower disease-free survival, cause specific survival, and overall survival than the luminal subtypes. Conclusions: None of the mentioned APBI guidelines predicted local or locoregional recurrence risk in our study population. Additional follow-up will be needed to recommend inclusion of molecular subtype (or at least HER2 receptor status) in the patient selection criteria for APBI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To investigate the interobserver variations in delineation of lumpectomy cavity (LC) and clinical target volume (CTV), and its impact on irradiated volume in accelerated partial breast irradiation using intraoperative multicatheter brachytherapy. Material and methods: Delineation of LC and CTV was done by five radiation oncologists on planning computed tomography (CT) scans of 20 patients with intraoperative interstitial breast implant. Cavity visualization index (CVI), four-point index ranging from (0 = poor) to (3 = excellent) was created and assigned by observers for each patient. In total, 200 contours for all observers and 100 treatment plans were evaluated. Spatial concordance (conformity index, CIcommon, and CIgen), average shift in the center of mass (COM), and ratio of maximum and minimum volumes (Vmax/ Vmin) of LC and CTV were quantified among all observers and statistically analyzed. Variation in active dwell positions (0.5 cm step) for each catheter, total reference air kerma (TRAK), volume enclosed by prescription isodose (V100%) among observers and its spatial concordance were analyzed. Results: The mean ± SD CIcommon of LC and CTV was 0.54 ± 0.09, and 0.58 ± 0.08, respectively. Conformity index tends to increase, shift in COM and Vmax/Vmin decrease significantly (p < 0.05), as CVI increased. Out of total 309 catheters, 29.8% catheters had no change, 29.8% and 17.5% catheters had variations of 1 and 2 dwell positions (0.5 cm and 1 cm), respectively. 9.3% catheters shown variations ≥ 10 dwell positions (5 cm). The mean ± SD CIcommon of V100% was 0.75 ± 0.11. The mean observed Vmax/Vmin of prescription isodose and TRAK was 1.18 (range, 1.03 to 1.56) and 1.11 (range, 1.03 to 1.35), respectively. Conclusions: Interobserver variability in delineation of target volume was found to be significantly related to CVI. Smaller variability was observed with excellent visualization of LC. Interobserver variations showed dosimetric impact on irradiation of breast tissue volume with prescription dose. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To describe early results of two cohorts of patients with low and intermediate risk of early breast cancer treated with accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using different schedules of multicatheter brachytherapy. Material and methods: Patients with early stage breast cancer after breast conserving surgery were enrolled for a prospective analysis. The APBI, using multicatheter brachytherapy, was delivered either eight times 4 Gy in five days with a planned total dose of 32 Gy, or seven times 5 Gy in four days with a planned total dose of 35 Gy. Primary endpoints were side effects. Results: Forty-eight patients were enrolled between 2012 and 2014. Patients characteristics were as follow: median age of patients was 55 years, early breast cancer was defined according GEC-ESTRO recommendations. With a median follow-up period of 37 months, no significant differences regarding late side effects and cosmesis between two cohorts of patients were documented. In total, cosmesis was excellent in 13/48 (27.1%) patients, good in 34/48 (70.8%) patients, and moderate in 1/48 patient (2.1%). Conclusions: Accelerated partial breast irradiation using multicatheter brachytherapy with 32 Gy/8 fractions and 35 Gy/7 fractions for early breast cancer seems to be similar in terms of late side effects. According to our findings, APBI was also feasible for intermediate-risk of early breast cancer patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using a single-lumen device is associated with better cosmetic outcomes if the spacing between the applicator and skin is > 7 mm. However, there are no reports addressing the late toxicity and clinical outcomes in patients treated with single-entry multi-lumen/catheter applicators who had close skin spacing (7 mm or less). We undertook this study to report clinical outcome, acute and late toxicity as well as cosmesis of early stage breast cancer patients with close skin spacing treated with APBI using multi-lumen or multi-catheter devices. Material and methods: This is a retrospective study of all breast cancer patients who had undergone APBI using single-entry multi-lumen/catheter devices in a single institution between 2008 to 2012. The study was limited to those with ≤ 7 mm spacing between the device and skin. Results: We identified 37 patients and 38 lesions with skin spacing of ≤ 7 mm. Seven lesions (18%) had spacing of ≤ 3 mm. Median follow-up was 47.5 months. There was one case of ipsilateral breast recurrence and one ipsilateral axillary recurrence. Based on RTOG criteria, 22 treated lesions experienced grade 1 and 9 lesions experienced grade 2 toxicity. Twenty-one lesions experienced late grade 1 toxicity. One patient had to undergo mastectomy due to mastitis. Twenty-four treated breasts showed excellent and 11 had good cosmetic outcome. Overall cosmesis trended towards a significant correlation with skin spacing. However, all patients with ≤ 3 mm skin spacing experienced acute and late toxicities. Conclusions: Accelerated partial breast irradiation can be safely performed in patients with skin spacing of ≤ 7 mm using single-entry multi-lumen/catheter applicators with excellent cosmetic outcomes and an acceptable toxicity profile. However, skin spacing of ≤ 3 mm is associated with acute and late toxicity and should be avoided if possible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The use of multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy (MIB) for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) in early breast cancer (EBC) patients outside the trial setting has increased. Hence, there is a need to critically evaluate implant quality. Moreover, there is a scarcity of reports using an open cavity technique. We report the dosimetric indices of open and closed cavity MIB techniques. Material and methods: The dosimetric parameters of 60 EBC patients treated with MIB (open and closed cavity) who underwent three dimensional, computerized tomography (CT) based planning for APBI from November 2011 to July 2015 were evaluated. Coverage Index (CI), Dose Homogeneity Index (DHI), Conformity Index (COIN), Plan Quality Index (PQI), and Dose Non-uniformity Index (DNR) were assessed. Results: Forty-one patients underwent open cavity and 19 patients underwent closed cavity placement of brachytherapy catheters. The median number of planes was 4 and median number of needles was 20. Median dose was 34 Gy with dose per fraction of 3.4 Gy, given twice a day, 6 hours apart. The D90 of the cavity and clinical target volume (CTV) were 105% and 89%, respectively. The median doses to the surgical clips were greater than 100%. The median CI of the cavity and CTV was 0.96 and 0.82, respectively. The DHI and COIN index of the CTV was 0.73 and 0.67. There were no significant differences in the dosimetric parameters based on whether the technique was done open or closed. Conclusions: Critical evaluation of the dosimetric parameters of MIB-APBI is important for optimal results. While the open and closed techniques have similar dosimetry, our institutional preference is for an open technique which eases the procedure due to direct visualization of the tumor cavity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) represents an evolving technique that is a standard of care option in appropriately selected woman following breast conserving surgery. While multiple techniques now exist to deliver APBI, interstitial brachytherapy represents the technique used in several randomized trials (National Institute of Oncology, GEC-ESTRO). More recently, many centers have adopted applicator-based brachytherapy to deliver APBI due to the technical complexities of interstitial brachytherapy. The purpose of this article is to review methods to evaluate and select patients for APBI, as well as to define potential workflow mechanisms that allow for the safe and effective delivery of APBI. Multiple consensus statements have been developed to guide clinicians on determining appropriate candidates for APBI. However, recent studies have demonstrated that these guidelines fail to stratify patients according to the risk of local recurrence, and updated guidelines are expected in the years to come. Critical elements of workflow to ensure safe and effective delivery of APBI include a multidisciplinary approach and evaluation, optimization of target coverage and adherence to normal tissue guideline constraints, and proper quality assurance methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To determine differences in patient's reported quality of life and self-reported breast cosmesis between whole breast radiation therapy (WBRT) and accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) via single and multi-lumen high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for women with early stage breast cancer. Material and methods: Patient information was retrospectively reviewed and survey data were prospectively collected for women treated between 2004 to 2014 (APBI) and 2012 to 2014 (WBRT). Criteria for APBI treatments were ER+ (after 2010), N0 (after 2010), T < 3 cm, and post-menopausal. All patients were given a survey with modified FACIT (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy) breast quality of life questions to rate their amount of pain, self-consciousness, low energy, presence of lymphedema, and breast cosmesis. Results: 242 APBI patients and 59 WBRT patients were identified. In the WBRT cohort, 34 women met departmental criteria for APBI treatment (WBRT who were APBI eligible). The FACIT survey was completed by 80 women treated with APBI (33%; mean follow-up time of 14 months), and 26 women treated with WBRT who were APBI eligible (76%; mean follow-up time of 26 months). During the first year post-treatment, low energy (p = 0.009), self-consciousness (p = 0.0004), and lymphedema (p = 0.0002) scores were significantly lower in the APBI cohort when compared to women treated with WBRT who were APBI eligible. During the second year post-treatment, women treated with APBI reported significantly better breast cosmesis (p = 0.04). The single-lumen balloon (score = 6.3/10) was found to be associated with worse cosmesis compared to the multi-lumen balloons (Mammosite ML and Contura; score = 8.2/10; p = 0.002). There were no significant differences in rates of recurrence between balloons or treatments (p > 0.05). Conclusions: APBI treated patients reported higher cosmetic satisfaction than patients in the matched WBRT cohort. Quality of life scores tended to improve over time. Multi-lumen catheters provided superior cosmetic results compared to single-lumen catheters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To describe a breast-conserving technique using interstitial brachytherapy after lumpectomy and axillary nodal sampling in selected women who are diagnosed with breast cancer in the presence of augmentation mammo- plasty. Material and methods: Over the past 20 years, we have developed and improved a technique of "pinch view" image- guided catheter insertion that avoids implant puncture. Selection criteria include: 1) women of any age with either subpectoral or retroglandular, augmentation implants (silicone or saline) who were diagnosed with stages Tis, T1, T2, N0, or N1 breast cancer; 2) any pathologic subtype of malignant breast cancer was accepted; 3) microscopic tumor extent ≤ 3 cm; 4) axillary node negative or metastasis to 1 to 3 nodes without extracapsular extension; and 5) surgical margins clear by the NSABP "no ink on tumor" definition. More than 250 women have been successfully treated. Patients were treated with high dose rate Iridium-192 brachytherapy to 34 Gy in 10 or 32 Gy in 8 twice daily fractions. The target volume was the surgical cavity edge with 1.5 to 2 cm margin using 3-D treatment planning systems. Results: The implant technique as currently employed is described. There have been no implant ruptures, and the Planning Treatment Volume (PTV-eval) exhibited at least 90% coverage by the 90% isodose line in the vast majority of cases. Dose Homogeneity Index exceeded 70% in most cases. The maximum skin dose was below the prescription dose in every case. Other than some patients with pre-existing capsular contracture, less than 5% experience new capsular contracture after interstitial brachytherapy. Conclusions: A technique of reliable and reproducible accelerated partial breast irradiation is described that minimizes the risk of capsular contracture by avoiding circumferential dose to the foreign body in the breast. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Currently, there are two described methods of catheter insertion for women undergoing multicatheter interstitial accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). These are a volume based template approach (template) and a non-template ultrasound guidance freehand approach (non-template). We aim to compare dosimetric endpoints between the template and non-template approach. Material and methods: Twenty patients, who received adjuvant multicatheter interstitial APBI between August 2008 to March 2010 formed the study cohort. Dosimetric planning was based on the RTOG 04-13 protocol. For standardization, the planning target volume evaluation (PTV-Eval) and organs at risk were contoured with the assistance of the attending surgeon. Dosimetric endpoints include D90 of the PTV-Eval, Dose Homogeneity Index (DHI), V200, maximum skin dose (MSD), and maximum chest wall dose (MCD). A median of 18 catheters was used per patient. The dose prescribed was 34 Gy in 10 fractions BID over 5 days. Results: The average breast volume was 846 cm³ (526-1384) for the entire cohort and there was no difference between the two groups (p = 0.6). Insertion time was significantly longer for the non-template approach (mean 150 minutes) compared to the template approach (mean: 90 minutes) (p = 0.02). The planning time was also significantly longer for the non-template approach (mean: 240 minutes) compared to the template approach (mean: 150 minutes) (p < 0.01). The template approach yielded a higher D90 (mean: 95%) compared to the non-template approach (mean: 92%) (p < 0.01). There were no differences in DHI (p = 0.14), V200 (p = 0.21), MSD (p = 0.7), and MCD (p = 0.8). Conclusions: Compared to the non-template approach, the template approach offered significant shorter insertion and planning times with significantly improved dosimetric PTV-Eval coverage without significantly compromising organs at risk dosimetrically. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Adjuvant radiotherapy is recommended post breast conserving surgery. Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI) offers a more attractive shorter course of treatment over 5 days compared to standard conventional external beam radiotherapy, which is often protracted. Multi-catheter interstitial APBI offers excellent dosimetric coverage. This article describes two insertion techniques for multi-catheter interstitial APBI, the operator dependent freehand technique, and the easier to learn template technique. The indications, benefits, and drawbacks of these two techniques are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study includes four years of our clinical trials to improve implant quality in multicatheter accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). The progress in dosimetric and volumetric parameters of the treatment plans was evaluated. One hundred and ninety-one women, for whom treatment plans were made based on three dimensional imaging, were selected for the study. To evaluate progress made in our APBI procedure, following parameters and indices were taken into account: percentage of the target volume receiving the reference dose (PTVref), minimum dose in the target volume expressed as a percentage of reference dose (PTVmin), dose homogeneity index (DHI), and conformity index (COIN). Additionally, the plan quality index was calculated for every group as the sum of mean values of four evaluated parameters. PTVref have increased from the mean value of 83.4% at the beginning to recent 94.8%. The maximum value equals to 95.4%. The same trend can be observed with PTVmin value, which has been improved from 51.7% to 70.1%, maximally. DHI and COIN mean values present similar progress. DHI value increased from 0.53 level to 0.68, and COIN from 0.58 in 2009 to 0.74. Plan quality index has increased from 2.46 in 2009 to 3.06, recently. The implant quality is crucial for the accurate dose distribution. This paper shows the progress that was made in APBI procedure to improve implant quality. Nowadays, our implant technique is based on three-dimensional CT imaging results in acceptable dose distributions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]