Search

Amiodarone induced thyrotoxicosis (AIT) is a challenging diagnosis that affects 3-5% of patients taking amiodarone in the United States. Type I AIT is seen in patients with preexisting thyroid disease and is generally treated with thionamides while type II AIT represents a destructive thyroiditis that responds to glucocorticoids. A mixed type exists and is associated with higher mortality, especially in older adults with cardiovascular disease. Thyroidectomy is considered a last resort option for patients intolerant or refractory to medical treatment. A 70 year-old male with a history of coronary artery disease, ventricular tachycardia (VT), and heart failure was referred to the endocrine clinic for abnormal thyroid function tests that showed TSH 5.0 ng/dL, FT3 4.61 pg/mL). Thyroid RAIU showed severely decreased uptake secondary to the high iodine content of amiodarone. He remained thyrotoxic despite using higher doses of prednisone (60 mg daily) and methimazole (90 mg daily). He was changed to PTU (900 mg daily) and started on cholestyramine, with no improvement in overall status. Several weeks after admission, a total thyroidectomy was performed. His postoperative course was unremarkable except for hypoparathyroidism. He was clinically and biochemically euthyroid one week after his procedure. At 6 months follow up, he remained stable on levothyroxine 100 mcg/day but continued to require calcitriol and calcium supplementation. We present an interesting case of mixed type AIT refractory to medical therapy associated with cardiovascular compromise. This case highlights the challenges in the diagnosis and management of such patients. Thyroid autoantibodies, thyroid ultrasound and RAIU were more indicative of Type II AIT, however, lack of response to high dose steroids was inconsistent with the diagnosis. While receiving the treatment for both Type I and II AIT, our patient had persistent clinical and biochemical thyrotoxicosis and required thyroidectomy. Although most AIT patients are treated medically, thyroidectomy is reserved for those most severe and refractory cases and is considered a viable option in such patients.

Introduction: Preeclampsia is a complication of pregnancy defined by new onset hypertension after 20 weeks with proteinuria or new onset thrombocytopenia, renal or liver dysfunction, pulmonary edema or cerebral/visual symptoms. Hyperthyroidism in pregnancy is usually due to Graves’ disease, and if poorly controlled can increase the risk of preeclampsia and thyroid storm. In this case report we present a case of preeclampsia with impending thyroid storm treated successfully with medical therapy, delivery, and plasmapheresis. Case Description: A 40-year-old female who is 31 6/7 weeks pregnant presents with cough and dyspnea. She has no known thyroid disease. Her systolic blood pressure at presentation is >160 mmHg. She is diagnosed with preeclampsia based on elevated spot protein/creatinine ratio (1.4 g/g) and persistent hypertension. A brain natriuretic peptide is elevated to 847 (reference range 4 (non-pregnancy reference range 0.70-1.48 ng/dL). She is started on therapy for impending thyroid storm, including maximum doses of propranolol, propylthiouracil, hydrocortisone and saturated solution of potassium iodide. Her thyroid stimulating immunoglobulin is > 500 (reference range 40 (reference range

Outcomes from intensive glycemic control postrenal transplant have not been studied.Our objective was to observe the optimal management of hyperglycemia in patients with diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance receiving renal transplantation.We conducted a randomized controlled trial with patients undergoing renal transplantation randomized to either i.v. insulin therapy (intensive) or standard s.c. insulin therapy while the patients were admitted to the hospital.The study consisted of a 3-day postrenal transplant group treated with intensive i.v. insulin [blood glucose (BG) = 70-110 mg/dl] or a control group treated with s.c. insulin (BG = 70-180 mg/dl).The primary endpoint was delayed graft function (DGF). Secondary endpoints were glycemic control, graft survival, and acute rejection episodes.A total of 104 patients were screened and randomized to either the intensive or control condition; however, the intention-to-treat analysis set consisted of only the 93 participants (n = 44 intensive, n = 49 control) that underwent a renal transplant. DGF was present in 18% (eight of 44) of the intensive group and 24% (12 of 49) of the control group (P = 0.46). The occurrence of severe hypoglycemia (BG40 mg/dl) and severe hyperglycemia (BG350 mg/dl) were the primary safety outcome measures. There were nine participants with hypoglycemia identified, seven of which (78%) were in the intensive treatment group (P = 0.08). There were 30 instances of hyperglycemia with five participants (11%) in the intensive group and 12 participants (24%) in the control group having at least one hyperglycemic event (P = 0.10). For the 11 rejection episodes, nine were in the intensive treatment group (P = 0.013).The primary outcome measure of DGF was not statistically different for the two treatment groups. Regarding longer-term rejection and graft survival, the intensively treated participants were at higher risk for a rejection episode.