1. Moralizing gods, impartiality and religious parochialism across 15 societies
- Author
-
Carla Handley, Sarah Mathew, Emma Cohen, Cristina Moya, Caitlyn D. Placek, Eva Kundtová Klocová, Tom Vardy, Alexander Bolyanatz, Martin Lang, Quentin D. Atkinson, Coren L. Apicella, Carolyn Lesorogol, Montserrat Soler, Aiyana K. Willard, Benjamin Grant Purzycki, Ara Norenzayan, Jonathan Weigel, Dimitris Xygalatas, Rita Anne McNamara, and Joseph Henrich
- Subjects
Male ,Religion and Psychology ,media_common.quotation_subject ,050109 social psychology ,Impartiality ,Morals ,050105 experimental psychology ,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology ,Animism ,Parochialism ,Dictator game ,Punishment ,Cultural Evolution ,Ethnicity ,GN Anthropology ,Humans ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,Behaviour ,Interpersonal Relations ,Cooperative Behavior ,Sociocultural evolution ,General Environmental Science ,media_common ,General Immunology and Microbiology ,05 social sciences ,General Medicine ,Ingroups and outgroups ,Social relation ,Punishing Gods ,Games, Experimental ,Outgroup ,Female ,General Agricultural and Biological Sciences ,Psychology ,Social psychology ,BL Religion - Abstract
The data set used for the current analyses together with protocols, hypotheses, and R code can be found at the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/epkbw/). © 2019 The Author(s). xThe emergence of large-scale cooperation during the Holocene remains a central problem in the evolutionary literature. One hypothesis points to culturally evolved beliefs in punishing, interventionist gods that facilitate the extension of cooperative behaviour toward geographically distant co-religionists. Furthermore, another hypothesis points to such mechanisms being constrained to the religious ingroup, possibly at the expense of religious outgroups. To test these hypotheses, we administered two behavioural experiments and a set of interviews to a sample of 2228 participants from 15 diverse populations. These populations included foragers, pastoralists, horticulturalists, and wage labourers, practicing Buddhism, Christianity, and Hinduism, but also forms of animism and ancestor worship. Using the Random Allocation Game (RAG) and the Dictator Game (DG) in which individuals allocated money between themselves, local and geographically distant co-religionists, and religious outgroups, we found that higher ratings of gods as monitoring and punishing predicted decreased local favouritism (RAGs) and increased resource-sharing with distant co-religionists (DGs). The effects of punishing and monitoring gods on outgroup allocations revealed between-site variability, suggesting that in the absence of intergroup hostility, moralizing gods may be implicated in cooperative behaviour toward outgroups. These results provide support for the hypothesis that beliefs in monitoring and punitive gods help expand the circle of sustainable social interaction, and open questions about the treatment of religious outgroups. John Templeton Foundation; Cultural Evolution of Religion Research Consortium (CERC); Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
- Published
- 2019