Search

The patient-reported assessment of physician empathy can be indicated for outcome research, at interventions and in medical practice. The aim of this investigation is the evaluation of the psychometric properties of the German version of the "Consultation and Relational Empathy" (CARE) measure on the example of inpatient cancer patients (N = 326). The one-dimensional structure of the instrument can be replicated by a confirmatorical factor analysis. Hypothesis-consistent relationships to different patient and physician factors as well as to socio-demographic and illness-particular features of the patients can be shown. In medical practice the CARE-scale can be used by the physician e. g. as a time-economic feedback instrument for the evaluation of strengths and weaknesses of their empathic behaviour, as a personal behaviour checklist within a consultation and/or as a checklist to determine patient preferences before/during a consultation.

Purpose: Retrospective analysis of the success and complication rates of chest port implantation via the lateral subclavian vein., Materials and Methods: Between January 2003 and June 2004, the lateral subclavian vein in 271 patients (186 women, 85 men, mean age 53.2 years) was punctured guided by ultrasound. This access was used to insert a port system, and the catheter tip was placed at the cavoatrial junction. The port reservoir was implanted in a subcutaneous infraclavicular pocket and fixed to the fascia of the pectoralis muscle. Indications for port implantation were chemotherapy (n = 239), total parenteral nutrition (n = 2) and intravenous medication (n = 30). The patient follow-up was mainly performed either by the oncology division of the department of gynecology or by the department of internal medicine., Results: A chest port catheter system was successfully implanted in all patients. The catheter remained in place for a mean duration of 269.4 days (SD 192.3 days). No complications occurred during implantation. In the post-interventional period, 6 catheter dysfunctions were found (thrombotic 0.09 per 1000 catheter days; mechanic 0.05 per 1000 catheter days). While one local infection occurred in the early post-interventional period, 3 local and 15 systemic infections were independent of the port catheter placement (0.39 per 1000 catheter days). The rate of port catheter ex-plantation due to dysfunction or infection was 0.07 per 1000 catheter days., Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided puncture of the lateral subclavian vein is a safe procedure for the insertion of central venous port catheter systems and had a very low complication rate in our study. For further evaluation of our port placement technique, prospective studies compared to placement through the internal jugular vein are necessary.

Purpose: To compare the image quality of digital X-ray mammographies obtained with wet imagers with that of standard dry imaging technology., Material and Methods: Beginning 03/08/2003, 200 X-ray mammographies with a digital fullfield mammography system (Lorad Selenia, Lorad/Hologic) were prospectively and consecutively documented with a wet laser imager (Scopix LR 5200, Agfa), a dry infrared laser imager (DryView 8610, Kodak) and a dry imager using the principle of direct thermography (Drystar 4500M, Agfa, N = 166). One X-ray exposure was systematically chosen from each examination and was presented in an anonymous and randomized form to three radiologists who evaluated the films using a structured questionnaire., Results: The visualization of normal anatomic structures was considered being good to excellent for all imagers with the mean assessments 1.0 - 2.4 for the Drystar 4500M, 1.0 - 2.1 for the DryView 8610 and 1.1 - 2.0 for the Scopix LR 5200. The mean assessments were 0.1 - 0.6 points lower in dense than in normal parenchyma, thus, the parenchymal density is the predominant factor for image quality., Conclusion: In view of the comparable image quality obtained with the different imagers used in the study, individual decisions to purchase a specific imager will be based on economics rather than on diagnostic points of view.

Purpose: To evaluate preoperative contrast enhanced MR imaging in clinically, mammographically and/or ultrasonographically established breast cancer., Materials and Method: From September 1998 to August 1999, preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast was performed in 91 patients with lesions highly suggestive of malignancy (BIRADS IV and V) by clinical, mammographic, and/or ultrasonographic criteria. MR imaging findings were postsurgically correlated with other imaging, intraoperative and histopathologic results., Results: Histopathologic analysis revealed 61 (66 %) malignant and 31 (34 %) benign lesions. In 63 (69 %) of the 91 investigated patients, MR mammographies were classified as tumor suspect and in the remaining 28 (31 %) cases as benign. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 90 %, 67 % and 81 % for contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Additional tumor manifestations (multifocal or multicentric disease, contralateral carcinoma) were found by MR imaging alone in 10 patients (11 %)., Conclusion: Contrast-enhanced MR imaging may reveal unsuspected multifocal, multicentric or contralateral breast carcinoma that changes the surgical therapy if the intention is total tumor removal. The prognostic role of a potentially more radical surgical therapy on the basis of these findings is not clear.

Background: In 1994, 5 % of a total of 25 718 examinations and 7 % of all 4630 B-mode sonograms performed in the Radiology Department, University of Cologne was classified as not indicated. In light of these results, the health care policy guidelines for sonographic indications have been amended., Purpose: The aim of this study was to establish the current rate of non-indicated sonographic examinations performed in routine diagnostics by radiology departments at university hospitals, to determine the reasons for such over-diagnosis and identify which regulatory mechanisms can be implemented to prevent his., Method: We counted the number of 1) B-mode and 2) color-flow Doppler ultrasound imaging procedures carried out in patients who had had no change in symptoms within the previous 4 weeks or who were scheduled without reference to an existing sonogram (double examinations). 3) The reasons for over-diagnosis were analyzed. 4) The 1994 survey was repeated in 2000 with an identical protocol and 5) additionally, a modified survey of the diagnostic questions was conducted., Results: 1) Out of 4,119 patients presenting for the first time to receive a B-mode sonogram, 443 prior sonograms (11 %), 305 CT scans (7 %) and 57 MRI scans (1 %) were documented. 2) Double sonograms were carried out in 6 % of the 1,118 patients presenting for the first time for color-flow Doppler ultrasounds and in 16 % of the 651 patients assigned to receive catheter angiographies with arterial color-flow Doppler. 2) 41 out of 55 (75 %) prior sonograms from non-university settings stated by 94 surgery patients were listed in the medical records. 36 out of 43 (84 %) prior sonograms from the university hospital were repeated in the same patients despite the fact that the medical report with the findings was available. None of the 48 sonograms indicated to confirm a plausible finding yielded any information that was additionally relevant to therapy. 4) In the period April - June, 2000, 12 % of all 15,921 tests and interventions, 26 % of 3,569 B-mode sonograms and 58 % of 1,033 abdominal sonograms performed in adults were classified as having not been indicated. 5) Staging and follow-up were stated as the most common reasons that a sonography was carried out in 46 % of the 1,017 adults who were given B-mode sonograms conducted from Jan - Mar, 2000 and comprised 62 % of the 410 sonograms classified as not or probably not medically indicated., Conclusion: The results showed that a multidisciplinary consensus was required to establish the diagnostic value of sonographic procedures. Therefore, this research group drafted a hospital-internal interdisciplinary guideline for "abdominal transcutaneous B-mode sonography in oncological questions".