Search

Purpose: To compare the accuracy of lesion detection and characterization and to determine the agreement of observers, methods and timing of mammography (MX), ultrasound (US) and MR imaging (MRI) during the first year after breast conserving therapy., Materials and Methods: The study included 20 patients diagnosed with breast cancer of stages equal or inferior to T2 N1bi M0 after breast conserving therapy and subsequent radiotherapy. Patients with any history of breast diseases in the affected or contralateral breast were excluded. Patients were examined before and at 3, 6 and 12 months after adjuvant radiotherapy with MX, US and dynamic MR mammography. Additional US and MRI were performed 3 months after radiotherapy. All 220 examinations were retrospectively read in a randomized order by two independent readers, blinded for the results of the other examinations. The outcome after 2.5 years of follow-up was used as gold standard. Histological examination was available in one case. Lesion detection and specificity were assessed including kappa values for different reliabilities between observers, timing and methods. The kappa values were used to characterize the degree of agreement as follows: > 0.8 very good; 0.6 - 0.8 good; 0.4 - 0.6 fair; 0.2 - 0.4 minimal; and < 0.2 negligible., Results: Based on the interpretation of all available findings (clinical examination, MX, US, MRT and histology in one case), 20 patients observed for a mean period of 2.5 years had no evidence of intramammary recurrence. Therefore the sensitivity of the various methods could not be assessed. The reading of certainly no lesion was given by MRI in 43 %, by MX in 30 % and by US in 5 % of all examinations (p < 0.05). True negative findings were observed by MRI in 94.4 %, by MX in 90.4 % and by US in 82.5 %. Reliability between observers, timing and imaging methods was 0.496, 0.411, and 0.215 for lesion detection and 0.303, 0.282, and 0.030 for lesion characterization., Conclusion: Within the first year after breast conserving therapy, MRI was the most confident method for the exclusion of lesions and presented the highest true negative rate. The assessment of dignity of a particular lesion was difficult by all imaging methods, reflected by the weak agreement between observers, methods and timing. The difference between times of readings were marginal in the first year after therapy. Agreement between the different diagnostics methods was minimal to negligible.

Purpose: To evaluate success, histologic accuracy, patient acceptance and BI-RADS TM-correlated malignancy rate of stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsies in order to optimize the indication., Materials and Methods: In 132 patients with mammographically detected breast lesions 166 stereotactic vacuum- assisted 11 gauge core biopsies were performed. All lesions were classified according to the BI-RADS TM categories of the ACR. Removal of the lesion was radiographically assessed as complete, representative or not representative. Patient acceptance was evaluated., Results: Of the 166 lesions, 54 (32.5 %) lesions were judged completely removed, 110 (66.3 %) representatively removed and 2 (1.2 %) not representatively removed. Malignancy was found in 38 (22.9 %) lesions. The rate of malignancy increased from 6.3 % (2/32) for BI-RADS TM category 3 to 16.7 % (19/114) for BI-RADS TM category 4 and increased further to 85 % (17/20) for BI-RADS TM category 5 (p < 0.001). The histology of a sufficient vacuum-assisted biopsy was underestimated in 6 (15 %) of the 40 lesions that were subsequently excised surgically. Most patients (98.5 %; 130/132) stated they would undergo a vacuum-assisted biopsy again., Conclusion: Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy is accurate, has a justifiable rate of histologic underestimation and is well accepted by patients. Patients with BI-RADS TM category 4 microcalcification benefit the most. Lesions of BI-RADS TM category 3 and BI-RADS TM category 5 should be biopsied only under special circumstances (family risk of breast cancer; assessment of lesions extension).

Purpose: To quantify therapy related effects after breast conservation therapy (BCT) with dynamic MRI of the breast., Methods: Twenty patients (median age 51 years) with breast conserving tumor excision were included. Contrast enhanced dynamic MRI was performed before and 3, 6 and 12 months after adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) with a total dose of 50.0 to 50.4 Gy. The following sequences were applied: axial fat-suppressed T(2)-weighted; coronal contrast enhanced 3D spoiled gradient-echo (first measurement prior to the administration of 0.16 mmol/kg Gd-DTPA, six repetitive measurements); sagittal T(1)-weighted Flash3D. Enhancement data were obtained using a computer software with automated segmentation of regions of interest (ROIs). After defining ROIs for skin, parenchyma and pectoral muscle of each breast the early enhancement after the first post contrast measurement (E(1)) and the slope of enhancement between the second and last postcontrast measurement (SE(2-L)) were calculated. The edema was quantified by assessing the signal intensities (SI) in the T(2)-weighted images. The thickness of the skin was measured in the sagittal T(1)-weighted images., Results: Three months after RT statistically significant increases between 51 and 179 % of the SI and E(1) quotients were detected for all tissues compared to the examinations prior to RT. Six months after RT the skin still presented a by 102 % significantly higher E(1) quotient, and a by 140 % significantly increased SI quotient. No significant differences for SI and E(1) quotients could be observed 12 months after RT compared to the examinations prior to RT. A significant increase of the SE(2-L) difference for the skin from 0.0225 to 0.0691 and 0.0665 was found 3 and 6 months after RT, respectively. No significant differences between the initial MR examination and the follow-up examinations 3, 6 and 12 months could be detected for the SE(2-L) differences of the parenchyma., Conclusion: Early therapy related effects after BCT can be exactly quantified with dynamic MRI using an automated ROI-segmentation and whole breast analysis software. Both edema formation and early enhancement show peaks 3 months after RT, and after 12 months there is no statistically significant difference compared with baseline.