Search

The global cement industry is responsible for 7% of anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions and, as such, has a vital role to play in the transition to a low carbon dioxide economy. In recent years, this has been achieved by technological advances and increased use of supplementary cementitious materials, but the authors have recently shown that there are other means of achieving comparable carbon dioxide savings, for example, by reducing workability. However, price remains a considerable barrier to the widespread implementation of low carbon dioxide concrete. Using the same model for concrete mix design as was used to determine embodied carbon dioxide (ECD), variations in the cost of the components of concrete have now been considered. Considering 24 different mix designs, each spanning a range of characteristic strengths from 20 to 100 MPa, measures to reduce the carbon dioxide footprint were also found to reduce the material cost of the concrete. As such, it may be considered that the construction industry is already encouraged to reduce its 'carbon footprint'. However, the concept of the carbon footprint was then considered in a more nuanced fashion, considering the ECD per unit strength. On such a basis, the cheapest mixes did not have the lowest ECD. Therefore, the impact of levying a charge on the carbon footprint was considered. To ensure low carbon dioxide concrete is also the cheapest, carbon dioxide emissions would have to be priced approximately one to two orders of magnitude higher than current market value. This would become the dominant factor in construction, with serious consequences for the industry. Furthermore, such charges may pose ethical problems, being viewed as a 'licence to pollute' and therefore undermining society's efforts to reduce the carbon dioxide emissions of the construction industry. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As legislation forces significant reductions in the operational carbon dioxide emissions of the built environment, increasing attention is focused on the embodied carbon of structural materials. As the most prevalent structural material, the embodied carbon of concrete is of paramount interest. Previous direct or indirect analyses of embodied carbon in concrete have treated it either as an elemental material with a value of single embodied carbon, or calculated embodied carbon for a limited range of reinforced concrete mix designs, or returned only values for plain concrete. In this paper, the results are presented from a preliminary study into the embodied carbon of reinforced concrete as a function of: concrete strength grade; steel strength; mix design; cement replacement; and structural form. Findings are expressed both in terms of EC (kgCO/kg reinforced concrete) and EC (kgCO per unit of structural performance). They suggest that there is a wide range of EC (0·06−0·47) and that EC is minimised by using C50 concrete. Savings in EC achieved by adjusting mix design parameters (20-35%) generally exceed those achieved by replacing cement with pulverised fuel ash (10-25%). C50 beams of all mix designs have lower EC than comparable timber composite or steel beams. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introducing new technologies into infrastructure (wind turbines, electric vehicles, low-carbon materials and so on) often demands materials that are 'critical'; their supply is likely to be disrupted owing to limited reserves, geopolitical instability, environmental issues and/or increasing demand. Non-critical materials may become critical if introduced into infrastructure, owing to its gigatonne scale. This potentially poses significant risk to the development of low-carbon infrastructure. Analysis of this risk has previously overlooked the relationship between the 'local properties' that determine the selection of a technology and the overall vulnerability of the system, a global property. Treating materials or components as elements having fixed properties overlooks optima within the local-global variable space that could be exploited to minimise vulnerability while maximising performance. In this study, a framework for such analysis is presented along with a preliminary measure of relative materials criticality by way of a case study (a wind turbine generator). Although introduction of critical materials (in this case, rare earth metals) enhances technical performance by up to an order of magnitude, the associated increase in criticality may be two or three orders of magnitude. Analysis at the materials and component levels produces different results; design decisions should be based on analysis at several levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]