Search

Overview of the project Approximately £400 million is invested annually in agri environment schemes in England, designed to compensate farmers for loss of production (income foregone) and additional costs, to meet environmental objectives. A further £1.8 billion in subsidies is paid to comply with environmental conditions of cross compliance and greening. In December 2019, it was estimated there were ca. 50,000 agri-environment agreements covering 1.8 million hectares. Current and previous monitoring of agri-environment schemes is diverse and varied, and conducted at scales of specific management options, whole AES agreements and 1 km squares covering multiple agreements. The Monitoring and Evaluation Programme of these schemes aims to deliver evidence to achieve the following: • Evaluate the delivery of agri-environment schemes and their effectiveness in achieving their intended policy objectives; • Inform current and future agri-environment policy, scheme delivery and development; • Fulfil domestic and European reporting requirements. The existing Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (2015-2020) for Agri-environment schemes (AES) in England includes four elements: integrated monitoring, landscape scale, thematic, and evaluation and synthesis. To date, monitoring has been primarily based on tried-and-tested approaches, which provide widely recognised metrics of quality, condition and species-resolution biodiversity data, and that have counterfactuals often derived from national monitoring schemes to enable evaluation of AES. Developing technologies will need to integrate with existing tried-and-tested approaches but offer huge potential for more extensive and efficient evaluation of AES. In this project we focus on technologies with greatest potential to deliver enhanced and more cost-effective monitoring of environmental ‘outcomes’ of direct land management and interventions, in support of the Environmental Land Management Scheme (ELMS). The technology areas covere

During the Environmental Change Network (ECN) site mangers meeting feedback on the role of UK-SCAPE funding was sought. Representatives from collaborating institutions did not restrict their comments to only the period of UK-SCAPE, as this program is a continuation of previous national capability funding. The stakeholders present appreciated the role of UKCEH through the processes of co-design, co-delivery and co-development in shaping the ECN. They further commented on the co-dependency conferred by the network for their institutions and sites. While several stakeholders noted that they could not benefit directly from UK-SCAPE funding they recognised that funding was required for coordination of the network in addition to collecting monitoring data. They highlighted the risk of failure of the network and the lost opportunities in terms of collaborative working and data delivery to the research community if funding is not maintained in the network.

During the Environmental Change Network (ECN) site mangers meeting feedback on the role of UK-SCAPE funding was sought. Representatives from collaborating institutions did not restrict their comments to only the period of UK-SCAPE, as this program is a continuation of previous national capability funding. The stakeholders present appreciated the role of UKCEH through the processes of co-design, co-delivery and co-development in shaping the ECN. They further commented on the co-dependency conferred by the network for their institutions and sites. While several stakeholders noted that they could not benefit directly from UK-SCAPE funding they recognised that funding was required for coordination of the network in addition to collecting monitoring data. They highlighted the risk of failure of the network and the lost opportunities in terms of collaborative working and data delivery to the research community if funding is not maintained in the network.