Search

Purpose: Compare extracranial internal carotid artery flow rates and intracranial collateral use between conventional ≥ 50% carotid stenosis and carotid near-occlusion, and between symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid near-occlusion. Methods: We included patients with ≥ 50% carotid stenosis. Degree of stenosis was diagnosed on CTA. Mean blood flow rates were assessed with four-dimensional phase-contrast MRI. Results: We included 110 patients of which 83% were symptomatic, and 38% had near-occlusion. Near-occlusions had lower mean internal carotid artery flow (70 ml/min) than conventional ≥ 50% stenoses (203 ml/min, P <.001). Definite use of ≥ 1 collateral was found in 83% (35/42) of near-occlusions and 10% (7/68) of conventional stenoses (P <.001). However, there were no differences in total cerebral blood flow (514 ml/min vs. 519 ml/min, P =.78) or ipsilateral hemispheric blood flow (234 vs. 227 ml/min, P =.52), between near-occlusions and conventional ≥ 50% stenoses, based on phase-contrast MRI flow rates. There were no differences in total cerebral or hemispheric blood flow, or collateral use, between symptomatic and asymptomatic near-occlusions. Conclusion: Near-occlusions have lower internal carotid artery flow rates and more collateral use, but similar total cerebral blood flow and hemispheric blood flow, compared to conventional ≥ 50% carotid stenosis.

Purpose: Compare extracranial internal carotid artery flow rates and intracranial collateral use between conventional ≥ 50% carotid stenosis and carotid near-occlusion, and between symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid near-occlusion. Methods: We included patients with ≥ 50% carotid stenosis. Degree of stenosis was diagnosed on CTA. Mean blood flow rates were assessed with four-dimensional phase-contrast MRI. Results: We included 110 patients of which 83% were symptomatic, and 38% had near-occlusion. Near-occlusions had lower mean internal carotid artery flow (70 ml/min) than conventional ≥ 50% stenoses (203 ml/min, P <.001). Definite use of ≥ 1 collateral was found in 83% (35/42) of near-occlusions and 10% (7/68) of conventional stenoses (P <.001). However, there were no differences in total cerebral blood flow (514 ml/min vs. 519 ml/min, P =.78) or ipsilateral hemispheric blood flow (234 vs. 227 ml/min, P =.52), between near-occlusions and conventional ≥ 50% stenoses, based on phase-contrast MRI flow rates. There were no differences in total cerebral or hemispheric blood flow, or collateral use, between symptomatic and asymptomatic near-occlusions. Conclusion: Near-occlusions have lower internal carotid artery flow rates and more collateral use, but similar total cerebral blood flow and hemispheric blood flow, compared to conventional ≥ 50% carotid stenosis.

The hypothesis of this study was that evaluation of radiodensity assessment beyond a carotid stenosis in arterial and/or venous phase can be used to separate near-occlusion and conventional ≥ 50% stenosis. We prospectively included participants with ≥ 50% carotid stenosis with inclusion preference for cases with extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) asymmetry. All participants were examined with a research biphasic computed tomography angiography (CTA) protocol (arterial and venous phase). Reference diagnosis was set by interpretation on CTA and radiodensity difference between ipsilateral and contralateral ICA (c-corrected) or vertebral (v-corrected) was compared. We included 93 participants, 62 with near-occlusion and 31 with conventional ≥ 50% stenosis. Just beyond the stenosis, median c-corrected radiodensity was - 20 Hounsfield units (HU) among near-occlusions and - 1 HU among conventional ≥ 50% stenoses (p < 0.001) in the arterial phase. For the venous phase, these findings were + 17 HU and + 3 HU (p = 0.007). Similar group differences were seen for v-correction. No parameter had good diagnostic performance, area under the curve ≤ 0.82. With specificity set at ≥ 95%, detected near-occlusions were foremost those with large side-to-side differences in distal ICA-diameter. Carotid near-occlusions can have reduced radiodensity beyond the stenosis in arterial phases and increased radiodensity in venous phases compared to a reference artery-which was not clearly seen for conventional stenoses. However, these radiodensity findings are best seen in near-occlusion cases that are not diagnostically challenging, while they work poorly as additional diagnostic aids.

The hypothesis of this study was that evaluation of radiodensity assessment beyond a carotid stenosis in arterial and/or venous phase can be used to separate near-occlusion and conventional ≥ 50% stenosis. We prospectively included participants with ≥ 50% carotid stenosis with inclusion preference for cases with extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) asymmetry. All participants were examined with a research biphasic computed tomography angiography (CTA) protocol (arterial and venous phase). Reference diagnosis was set by interpretation on CTA and radiodensity difference between ipsilateral and contralateral ICA (c-corrected) or vertebral (v-corrected) was compared. We included 93 participants, 62 with near-occlusion and 31 with conventional ≥ 50% stenosis. Just beyond the stenosis, median c-corrected radiodensity was - 20 Hounsfield units (HU) among near-occlusions and - 1 HU among conventional ≥ 50% stenoses (p < 0.001) in the arterial phase. For the venous phase, these findings were + 17 HU and + 3 HU (p = 0.007). Similar group differences were seen for v-correction. No parameter had good diagnostic performance, area under the curve ≤ 0.82. With specificity set at ≥ 95%, detected near-occlusions were foremost those with large side-to-side differences in distal ICA-diameter. Carotid near-occlusions can have reduced radiodensity beyond the stenosis in arterial phases and increased radiodensity in venous phases compared to a reference artery-which was not clearly seen for conventional stenoses. However, these radiodensity findings are best seen in near-occlusion cases that are not diagnostically challenging, while they work poorly as additional diagnostic aids.

Purpose: Compare extracranial internal carotid artery flow rates and intracranial collateral use between conventional ≥ 50% carotid stenosis and carotid near-occlusion, and between symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid near-occlusion. Methods: We included patients with ≥ 50% carotid stenosis. Degree of stenosis was diagnosed on CTA. Mean blood flow rates were assessed with four-dimensional phase-contrast MRI. Results: We included 110 patients of which 83% were symptomatic, and 38% had near-occlusion. Near-occlusions had lower mean internal carotid artery flow (70 ml/min) than conventional ≥ 50% stenoses (203 ml/min, P <.001). Definite use of ≥ 1 collateral was found in 83% (35/42) of near-occlusions and 10% (7/68) of conventional stenoses (P <.001). However, there were no differences in total cerebral blood flow (514 ml/min vs. 519 ml/min, P =.78) or ipsilateral hemispheric blood flow (234 vs. 227 ml/min, P =.52), between near-occlusions and conventional ≥ 50% stenoses, based on phase-contrast MRI flow rates. There were no differences in total cerebral or hemispheric blood flow, or collateral use, between symptomatic and asymptomatic near-occlusions. Conclusion: Near-occlusions have lower internal carotid artery flow rates and more collateral use, but similar total cerebral blood flow and hemispheric blood flow, compared to conventional ≥ 50% carotid stenosis.

Purpose: Compare extracranial internal carotid artery flow rates and intracranial collateral use between conventional ≥ 50% carotid stenosis and carotid near-occlusion, and between symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid near-occlusion. Methods: We included patients with ≥ 50% carotid stenosis. Degree of stenosis was diagnosed on CTA. Mean blood flow rates were assessed with four-dimensional phase-contrast MRI. Results: We included 110 patients of which 83% were symptomatic, and 38% had near-occlusion. Near-occlusions had lower mean internal carotid artery flow (70 ml/min) than conventional ≥ 50% stenoses (203 ml/min, P <.001). Definite use of ≥ 1 collateral was found in 83% (35/42) of near-occlusions and 10% (7/68) of conventional stenoses (P <.001). However, there were no differences in total cerebral blood flow (514 ml/min vs. 519 ml/min, P =.78) or ipsilateral hemispheric blood flow (234 vs. 227 ml/min, P =.52), between near-occlusions and conventional ≥ 50% stenoses, based on phase-contrast MRI flow rates. There were no differences in total cerebral or hemispheric blood flow, or collateral use, between symptomatic and asymptomatic near-occlusions. Conclusion: Near-occlusions have lower internal carotid artery flow rates and more collateral use, but similar total cerebral blood flow and hemispheric blood flow, compared to conventional ≥ 50% carotid stenosis.

BackgroundThe risk of early stroke recurrence amongst patients with symptomatic carotid near-occlusion with and without full collapse is unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyse the 90-day risk of recurrent ipsilateral ischaemic stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid near-occlusion both with and without full collapse. MethodsThis study was a secondary analysis of the Additional Neurological SYmptoms before Surgery of the Carotid Arteries: a Prospective study (ANSYSCAP). We prospectively analysed 230 consecutive patients with symptomatic 50-99% carotid stenosis or near-occlusion. Based on the combination of several imaging modalities, 205 (89%) patients were classified as having 50-99% carotid stenosis, and 10 (4%) and 15 (7%) as having near-occlusion with and without full collapse, respectively. The 90-day risk of recurrent ipsilateral ischaemic stroke was compared between these three groups. Only events that occurred before carotid endarterectomy were analysed. ResultsThe 90-day risk of recurrent stroke was 18% [95% confidence interval (CI) 12-25%; n=29] for patients with 50-99% carotid stenosis, 0% for patients with near-occlusion without full collapse and 43% (95% CI 25-89%; n=4) for patients with near-occlusion with full collapse (P=0.035, log-rank test). The increased risk of recurrent ipsilateral ischaemic stroke for patients with symptomatic near-occlusion with full collapse remained significant after multivariable adjustment for age, sex and type of presenting event. ConclusionsPatients with symptomatic carotid near-occlusion with full collapse might have a very high risk of stroke recurrence. Carotid endarterectomy could be considered for these patients.