Search

Analysis of the effect of a change in foraging options on intake rate and predation rate revealed that short-term changes that improve the environment lead to an increase in the intake rate while long-term improvements keep the intake rate on the same level or reduce it. Intake rate will decline if improvements in the food supply have greater effect on good, more than on bad sources of food.

The study of optimal life histories involves the maximization of lifetime fitness but usually ignores the details of behavioral sequences. In contrast, the study of optimal behavioral sequences usually looks at the details of a sequence in isolation and not as part of the whole life history of the animal. The currency that is maximized is assumed to be related to lifetime fitness, but this relationship is rarely explored. In this paper we develop a common currency for behavioral decisions that is directly related to lifetime fitness. The common currency makes it possible to compare the benefits of qualitatively different behaviors. We show that many different costs can be used to explain a given behavioral sequence. Most of these costs have no biological interpretation. From these we single out a particular cost, the canonical cost, which measures the reduction in fitness that results from choosing a suboptimal action. Our general framework is illustrated by the example of a small bird in winter. We quantify the value of energy in terms of fitness and show how this value depends on energy reserves and time of day. As a result of this dependence, optimal foraging decisions depend on energy reserves and time of day, as does the optimal trade-off between foraging and looking around for predators. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]