Search

Background: A simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) may result in increased out-of-field (D OOF ) and photoneutron (H PN ) doses in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for prostate cancer (PCA). This work therefore aimed to compare D OOF and H PN in flattened (FLAT) and flattening filter-free (FFF) 6‑MV and 10-MV VMAT treatment plans with and without SIB., Methods: Eight groups of 30 VMAT plans for PCA with 6 MV or 10 MV, with or without FF and with uniform (2 Gy) or SIB target dose (2.5/3.0 Gy) prescriptions (CONV, SIB), were generated. All 240 plans were delivered on a slab-phantom and compared with respect to measured D OOF and H PN in 61.8 cm distance from the isocenter. The 6‑ and 10-MV flattened VMAT plans with conventional fractionation (6- and 10-MV FLAT CONV) served as standard reference groups. Doses were analyzed as a function of delivered monitor units (MU) and weighted equivalent square field size A eq . Pearson's correlation coefficients between the presented quantities were determined., Results: The SIB plans resulted in decreased H PN over an entire prostate RT treatment course (10-MV SIB vs. CONV -38.2%). Omission of the flattening filter yielded less H PN (10-MV CONV -17.2%; 10-MV SIB -22.5%). The SIB decreased D OOF likewise by 39% for all given scenarios, while the FFF mode reduced D OOF on average by 60%. A strong Pearson correlation was found between MU and H PN (r > 0.9) as well as D OOF (0.7 < r < 0.9)., Conclusion: For a complete treatment, SIB reduces both photoneutron and OOF doses to almost the same extent as FFF deliveries. It is recommended to apply moderately hypofractionated 6‑MV SIB FFF-VMAT when considering photoneutron or OOF doses., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Single-session cardiac stereotactic radiation therapy (SBRT) has demonstrated promising results for patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, the full safety profile of this novel treatment remains unknown and very limited data from prospective clinical multicenter trials are available., Methods: The prospective multicenter multiplatform RAVENTA (radiosurgery for ventricular tachycardia) study assesses high-precision image-guided cardiac SBRT with 25 Gy delivered to the VT substrate determined by high-definition endocardial and/or epicardial electrophysiological mapping in patients with refractory VT ineligible for catheter ablation and an implanted cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Primary endpoint is the feasibility of full-dose application and procedural safety (defined as an incidence of serious [grade ≥ 3] treatment-related complications ≤ 5% within 30 days after therapy). Secondary endpoints comprise VT burden, ICD interventions, treatment-related toxicity, and quality of life. We present the results of a protocol-defined interim analysis., Results: Between 10/2019 and 12/2021, a total of five patients were included at three university medical centers. In all cases, the treatment was carried out without complications. There were no serious potentially treatment-related adverse events and no deterioration of left ventricular ejection fraction upon echocardiography. Three patients had a decrease in VT episodes during follow-up. One patient underwent subsequent catheter ablation for a new VT with different morphology. One patient with local VT recurrence died 6 weeks after treatment in cardiogenic shock., Conclusion: The interim analysis of the RAVENTA trial demonstrates early initial feasibility of this new treatment without serious complications within 30 days after treatment in five patients. Recruitment will continue as planned and the study has been expanded to further university medical centers., Trial Registration Number: NCT03867747 (clinicaltrials.gov). Registered March 8, 2019. Study start: October 1, 2019., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Purpose: In the beam penumbra of stereotactic body radiotherapy volumes, dose rate effects in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) may be the predominant cause for failures in the absence of neutron-generating photon energies. We investigate such dose rate effects in ICDs and provide evidence for safe use of lung tumor stereotactic radioablation with flattening filter free (FFF) and flattened 6 Megavolt (MV) beams in ICD-bearing patients., Methods: Sixty-two ICDs were subjected to scatter radiation in 1.0, 2.5, and 7.0 cm distance to 100 Gy within a 5 × 5 cm 2 radiation field. Radiation was applied with 6 MV FFF beams (constant dose rate of 1400 cGy/min) and flattened (FLAT) 6 MV beams (430 cGy/min). Local dose rates (LDR) at the position of all ICDs were measured. All ICDs were monitored continuously., Results: With 6 MV FFF beams, ICD errors occurred at distances of 1.0 cm (LDR 46.8 cGy/min; maximum ICD dose 3.4 Gy) and 2.5 cm (LDR 15.6 cGy/min; 1.1 Gy). With 6 MV FLAT beams, ICD errors occurred only at 1 cm distance (LDR 16.8 cGy/min; 3.9 Gy). No errors occurred at an LDR below 7 cGy/min, translating to a safe distance of 2.5 cm (1.5 Gy) in flattened and 7 cm (0.4 Gy) in 6 MV FFF beams., Conclusion: A LDR in ICDs larger than 7 cGy/min may cause ICD malfunction. At identical LDR, differences between 6 MV FFF and 6 MV FLAT beams do not yield different rates of malfunction. The dominant reason for ICD failures could be the LDR and not the total dose to the ICD. For most stereotactic treatments, it is recommended to generate a planning risk volume around the ICD in which LDR larger than 7 cGy/min are avoided., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

This review details and discusses the technological quality requirements to ensure the desired quality for stereotactic radiotherapy using photon external beam radiotherapy as defined by the DEGRO Working Group Radiosurgery and Stereotactic Radiotherapy and the DGMP Working Group for Physics and Technology in Stereotactic Radiotherapy. The covered aspects of this review are 1) imaging for target volume definition, 2) patient positioning and target volume localization, 3) motion management, 4) collimation of the irradiation and beam directions, 5) dose calculation, 6) treatment unit accuracy, and 7) dedicated quality assurance measures. For each part, an expert review for current state-of-the-art techniques and their particular technological quality requirement to reach the necessary accuracy for stereotactic radiotherapy divided into intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery in one single fraction (SRS), intracranial fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT), and extracranial stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is presented. All recommendations and suggestions for all mentioned aspects of stereotactic radiotherapy are formulated and related uncertainties and potential sources of error discussed. Additionally, further research and development needs in terms of insufficient data and unsolved problems for stereotactic radiotherapy are identified, which will serve as a basis for the future assignments of the DGMP Working Group for Physics and Technology in Stereotactic Radiotherapy. The review was group peer-reviewed, and consensus was obtained through multiple working group meetings.

Background and Purpose: In this retrospective treatment planning study, the effect of a uniform and non-uniform planning target volume (PTV) dose coverage as well as a coplanar and non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivery approach for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) were compared., Materials and Methods: For 46 patients with lesions in the peripheral lungs, three different treatment plans were generated: First, a coplanar 220° VMAT sequence with a uniform PTV dose prescription (UC). Second, a coplanar 220° VMAT treatment plan with a non-uniform dose distribution in the PTV (nUC). Third, a non-coplanar VMAT dose delivery with four couch angles (0°, ±35°, 90°) and a non-uniform prescription (nUnC) was used. All treatment plans were optimized for pareto-optimality with respect to PTV coverage and ipsilateral lung dose. Treatment sequences were delivered on a flattening-filter-free linear accelerator and beam-on times were recorded. Dosimetric comparison between the three techniques was performed., Results: For the three scenarios (UC, nUC, nUnC), median gross tumor volume (GTV) doses were 63.4 ± 2.5, 74.4 ± 3.6, and 77.9 ± 3.8 Gy, and ipsilateral V10Gy lung volumes were 15.7 ± 6.1, 13.9 ± 4.7, and 12.0 ± 5.1%, respectively. Normal tissue complication probability of the ipsilateral lung was 3.9, 3.1, and 2.8%, respectively. The number of monitor units were 5141 ± 1174, 4104 ± 786, and 3657 ± 710 MU and the corresponding beam-on times were 177 ± 54, 143 ± 29, and 148 ± 26 s., Conclusion: For SBRT treatments in DIBH, a non-uniform dose prescription in the PTV, combined with a non-coplanar VMAT arc arrangement, significantly spares the ipsilateral lung while increasing dose to the GTV without major treatment time increase.

Background: This treatment planning study analyzes dose coverage and dose to organs at risk (OAR) in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) of rectal cancer and compares prone vs. supine positioning as well as the effect of dose optimization for the small bowel (SB) by additional dose constraints in the inverse planning process., Patients and Methods: Based on the CT datasets of ten male patients in both prone and supine position, a total of four different IMRT plans were created for each patient. OAR were defined as the SB, bladder, and femoral heads. In half of the plans, two additional SB cost functions were used in the inverse planning process., Results: There was a statistically significant dose reduction for the SB in prone position of up to 41% in the high and intermediate dose region, compared with the supine position. Furthermore, the femoral heads showed a significant dose reduction in prone position in the low dose region. Regarding the additional active SB constraints, the dose in the high dose region of the SB was significantly reduced by up to 14% with the additional cost functions. There were no significant differences in the dose distribution of the planning target volume (PTV) and the bladder., Conclusion: Prone positioning can significantly reduce dose to the SB in IMRT for rectal cancer and therefore should not only be used in 3D conformal radiotherapy but also in IMRT of rectal cancer. Further protection of the SB can be achieved by additional dose constraints in inverse planning without jeopardizing the homogeneity of the PTV.

Purpose: Combined kV-MV cone-beam CT (CBCT) is a promising approach to accelerate imaging for patients with lung tumors treated with deep inspiration breath-hold. During a single breath-hold (15 s), a 3D kV-MV CBCT can be acquired, thus minimizing motion artifacts and increasing patient comfort. Prior to clinical implementation, positioning accuracy was evaluated and compared to clinically established imaging techniques., Methods and Materials: An inhomogeneous thorax phantom with four tumor-mimicking inlays was imaged in 10 predefined positions and registered to a planning CT. Novel kV-MV CBCT imaging (90° arc) was compared to clinically established kV-chest CBCT (360°) as well as nonclinical kV-CBCT and low-dose MV-CBCT (each 180°). Manual registration, automatic registration provided by the manufacturer and an additional in-house developed manufacturer-independent framework based on the MATLAB registration toolkit were applied., Results: Systematic setup error was reduced to 0.05 mm by high-precision phantom positioning with optical tracking. Stochastic mean displacement errors were 0.5 ± 0.3 mm in right-left, 0.4  ± 0.4 mm in anteroposterior and 0.0 ± 0.4 mm in craniocaudal directions for kV-MV CBCT with manual registration (maximum errors of no more than 1.4 mm). Clinical kV-chest CBCT resulted in mean errors of 0.2 mm (other modalities: 0.4-0.8 mm). Similar results were achieved with both automatic registration methods., Conclusion: The comparison study of repositioning accuracy between novel kV-MV CBCT and clinically established volume imaging demonstrated that registration accuracy is maintained below 1 mm. Since imaging time is reduced to one breath-hold, kV-MV CBCT is ideal for image guidance, e.g., in lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy.

Background and Purpose: Flattening-filter-free (FFF) beams are increasingly used in radiotherapy as delivery times can be substantially reduced. However, the relative biologic effectiveness (RBE) of FFF may be increased relative to conventional flattened (FLAT) beams due to differences in energy spectra. Therefore, we investigated the effects of FFF and FLAT beams on the clonogenic survival of astrocytoma cells., Material and Methods: Three cell lines (U251, U251-MGMT, and U87) were irradiated with 6-MV and 10-MV X-rays from a linear accelerator in FFF- or FLAT-beam modes at dose rates in the range of 0.5-24 Gy/min. The surviving fraction (SF) as function of dose (2-12 Gy) was determined by the colony formation assay and fitted by the linear-quadratic model. For both beams (FFF or FLAT), the cells were pelleted in conical 15-ml centrifuge tubes and irradiated at 2-cm depth in a 1 × 1-cm(2) area on the central axis of a 30 × 30-cm(2) field. Dosimetry was performed with a 0.3-cm(3) rigid ionization chamber. RBE was determined for FFF versus FLAT irradiation., Results: The RBE of FFF at 7.3-11.3 Gy was 1.027 ± 0.013 and 1.063 ± 0.018 relative to FLAT beams for 6- and 10-MV beams, respectively, and was only significantly higher than 1 for 10 MV. Significantly increased survival rates were seen for lower dose rates (0.5 Gy/min FLAT vs. 5 Gy/min FLAT) at higher doses (11.9 Gy), while no differences were seen at dose rates  ≥ 1.4 Gy/min (1.4 Gy/min FFF vs. 14 Gy/min FFF and 2.4 Gy/min FFF vs. 24 Gy/min FFF)., Conclusions: FFF beams showed only a slightly increased RBE relative to FLAT beams in this experimental set-up, which is unlikely to result in clinically relevant differences in outcome.

Background and Purpose: Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) has the potential to deliver dose distributions comparable to the established intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques for a multitude of target paradigms. Prior to implementing VMAT into their clinical routine in December 2008, the authors evaluated the dose calculation/delivery accuracy of 24 sample VMAT plans (prostate and anal cancer target paradigms) with film and ionization dosimetry. After the start of the clinical program, in vivo measurements with a rectal probe were performed., Material and Methods: The VMAT plans were generated by the treatment-planning system (TPS) ERGO++ (Elekta, Crawley, UK) and transferred to a phantom. Film dosimetry was performed with Kodak EDR2 films, and evaluated with dose profiles and gamma-index analysis. Appropriate ionization chambers were used for absolute dose measurements in the phantom and for in vivo measurements. The ionization chamber was used with localization of the measurement volume based on positioning cone-beam computed tomography., Results: Plans were transferred from ERGO++ to the record and verify (R&V) system/linear accelerator (linac). The absolute dose deviations recorded with the ionization chamber were 1.74% +/- 1.62% across both indications. The gamma-index analysis of the film dosimetry showed no deviation > 3%/3 mm in the high-dose region. On in vivo measurements, a deviation between calculation and measurement of 2.09% +/- 2.4% was recorded, when the chamber was successfully positioned in the high-dose region., Conclusion: VMAT plans can be planned and treated reproducibly in high quality after the commissioning of the complete delivery chain consisting of TPS, R&V system and linac. The results of the individual plan verification meet the commonly accepted requirements. The first in vivo measurements confirm the reproducible precision of the delivered dose during clinical treatments.