Search

Objective: Osteoporosis is a highly prevalent disease worldwide. Consequences of vertebral osteoporotic fractures include pain and progressive vertebral collapse resulting in spinal kyphosis, decreased quality of life, disability and mortality. Minimally invasive procedures represent an advance to the treatment of osteoporotic VCFs. Despite encouraging results reported by many authors, surgical intervention in an osteoporotic spine is fraught with difficulties. Advanced patients age and comorbidities are of great concern., Patients and Methods: We designed a retrospective case-control study on 110 post-menopausal women consecutively visited at our institution. Study population was split in a surgical and a conservative cohort, according to the provided treatment., Results: Kyphoplasty treated patients had lower back pain VAS scores at 1 month as compared with conservatively treated patients (p < 0.05). EQ5D validated questionnaire also showed a better quality of life at 1 month for surgically treated patients (p < 0.05). SF-12 scores showed greater improvements at 1 month and 3 months with statistically significant difference between the two groups just at 3 months (p < 0.05). At 12 months, scores from all scales were not statistically different between the two cohorts, although surgically treated patients showed better trends than conservatively treated patients in pain and quality of life. Kyphoplasty was able to restore more than 54.55% of the original segmental kyphosis, whereas patients in conservative cohort lost 6.67% of the original segmental kyphosis on average., Conclusions: Kyphoplasty is a modern minimal invasive surgery, allowing faster recovery than bracing treatment. It can avoid the deformity in kyphosis due to VCF. In fact, the risk to develop a new vertebral fracture after the first one is very high.

Background: Osteoporosis is a very common bone disorder and accounts for 1.4 million vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) per year, mostly in post-menopausal women., Aim: The aim of this study was to develop a risk scoring system to identify and gauge the risk of osteoporotic VCFs in post-menopausal women., Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study on 477 post-menopausal women consecutively visited at our institution. We studied 15 different clinical variables, i.e. age, body mass index (BMI), weight, L1-L4 lumbar T-Score, L1-L4 lumbar Z-Score, L1-L4 lumbar bone mineral density (BMD), femoral neck T-Score, femoral neck Z-Score, femoral neck BMD, smoking habit, alcohol consumption, 25-OH-vitamin D, total alkaline phosphatase, bone alkaline phosphatase, and L4 vertebral volume. Study population was split in a derivation and a validation cohort. A logistic regression model was used to develop a predictive score of osteoporotic VCFs in the derivation cohort, finally the performance of the score was tested in the validation cohort., Results: Age, L1-L4 lumbar T-Score, femoral neck T-Score, L4 vertebral volume, and smoking habit were found to be predictors of VCFs. To each variable a score from 0 to +12 was assigned to the magnitude of regression coefficient. A score ≥ 22 identified VCFs with a sensitivity of 87%/89% and a specificity of 87%/90% in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively., Conclusions: Our findings indicate that a simple score derived from clinical history and routine diagnostic workout can be usefully employed to gauge the risk of fragility VCFs in post-menopausal women.

Background: Most patients affected by spinal tuberculosis can be successfully treated conservatively with chemotherapy, external bracing and prolonged rest. Nevertheless, kyphotic deformity, spinal instability and neurological deficit remain a common complication associated with conservative approach., Aim: To illustrate different indications and treatment modalities for tuberculous spondylodiscitis, focusing on the role of surgery as an adjuvant of effective chemotherapy in the management of selected patients., Materials and Methods: Various early and late surgical procedures are recommended to treat spinal tuberculosis. The Authors analyzed surgical indications, approaches, complications and outcomes comparing their experience with available Literature., Results: Conservative management is preferable in patients without vertebral instability and deformity; in presence of abscesses, invasive radiological techniques in combination with abscess drainage and chemotherapy are recommended. In patients with vertebral collapse, kyphotic deformity or abscess formation, vertebral instability or neurological deficits, anterior radical debridement, anterior strut grafting and anterior instrumentation is an optimal standardized procedure. In patients with involvement of more than two vertebral levels or lumbosacral junction and in those whose sagittal alignment is markedly deformed with segmental kyphosis, and in patients who have difficulty in undergoing anterior instrumentation, posterior instrumentation is recommended in combination with anterior radical debridement and anterior strut grafting in one or two staged procedures., Conclusions: Since surgery for spinal tuberculosis is demanding, it should be performed only after taking into account the risks and benefits in operable patients. Various surgical procedures are recommended to treat spinal tuberculosis but the common goals are to eradicate the infection and to prevent or to treat neurologic deficits or spinal deformity.

Background: Pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis (PVO) represents approximately 2-7% of all cases of osteomyelitis. The approach to the treatment of PVO may be conservative, which includes antibiotic therapy and orthopaedic treatment, or surgical., Aim: To overview conservative and surigical approaches to PVO., Methods: A literature review was performed using the Pubmed database to identify studies published in the last 20 years, addressing the treatment of PVO., Results: Empirical antibiotic treatment of PVO, while waiting for the results of cultures or in culture-negative cases, should include broad spectrum agents in association with agents active on Staphylococcus (S.) aureus. Based on local epidemiological data, antibiotics active on methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA) should be included. Once an organism has been identified, antibiotics should be initially administered intravenously but the optimal duration of antimicrobial therapy is unclear. Studies have reported that the incidence of treatment failure was higher when i.v. therapy was administered for less than 4 weeks. Rifampin is widely used in the combination therapy of PVO, but no controlled trials are available to define weather this approach is beneficial. Many PVO need a surgical treatment and can represent a real challenge for the orthopaedic surgeon. Anterior and posterior cervical, thoracic, lumbar approaches and the relatives surgical strategies are reported in this review. Moreover, recently the mininvasive posterior stabilization have been proposed as a efficient alternative to open surgery in elderly with severe comorbidities. Possible advantages and limitations of this technique are also reported., Conclusions: Further research is needed in order to define the optimal duration of antibiotic therapy, and the benefits and limitations of open or mini-invasive surgical techniques.

Postoperative spine infections (PSIs) are a frequent and dreaded complication of spine surgery. Although different studies have been published, the prevalence of PSIs is thought to be about 5% for most spine surgical procedures. Different risk factors have been identified for PSIs. Among the others, extensive soft tissue dissection, longer operative time, soft tissue devitalization, and use of surgical instrumentation have been associated with higher risks of infection. Direct inoculation during surgery is the common infection route for PSIs. Gram-positive cocci (such as Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis and beta-hemolytic streptococci) are the most common pathogens. Gram-negative bacteria also play a role in PSIs and may be associated with systemic illness and multisystem organ failure. A high level of suspicion is of paramount importance in early diagnosis of PSIs. Clinical symptoms of PSIs may be subtle and the infection may become apparent only in its late stages. Early diagnosis is the most important prognostic factor for PSIs. Although blood tests (i.e. ESR, CRP, and white blood cell count) and imaging studies (most commonly MRI) can be useful, it must be clear to the clinician that diagnostic modalities, either tissue biopsy or blood cultures, are of the utmost importance for diagnosing PSIs and devising a correct antibiotic therapy. Antibiotic therapy with early bracing (or bed rest) is the most commonly used treatment method for PSIs. Nevertheless, a more aggressive surgical treatment may be required in some patients. The goals of surgical treatment are to help the eradication of the infection, provide an adequate wound closure, and maintain spine column mechanical stability.