Search

Introduction: Floating right heart thrombi (FRHTS) are a rare phenomenon associated with high mortality. Immediate treatment is mandatory, but optimal therapy is controversial., Objective: To compare the clinical characteristics according to different treatment strategies and to identify predictors of mortality on patients with FRHTS., Methods: We conducted a systematic search of reported clinical cases of TTRH from 2006 to 2016., Results: 207 patients were analyzed, median age was 60years, 51.7% were men, 31.4% presented with shock. Pulmonary thromboembolism was present in 85% of the cases. The treatments administered were anticoagulation therapy in 44 patients (21.28%), surgical embolectomy in 89 patients (43%), thrombolytic therapy in 66 patients (31.8%), percutaneous thrombectomy in 3 patients (1.93%) and fibrinolytic in situ in 4 (1.45%). The overall mortality rate was 21.3%. The mortality associated with anticoagulation alone was higher than surgical embolectomy or thrombolysis (36.4 vs 18% vs 18.2%, respectively, p=0.03), and in percutaneous thrombectomy and fibrinolytics in situ was 0%. At multivariate analysis, only anticoagulation alone (odds ratio [OR] 2.4, IC 95% 1.07-5.4, p=0.03), and shock (OR 2.87 (IC 95% 1.3-5.9, p=0.005) showed a statistically significant effect on mortality., Conclusion: FRHTS represent a serious form of thromboembolism that requires rapid decisions to improve the survival. Anticoagulation as the only strategy does not seem to be sufficient, while thrombolysis and surgical thrombectomy show better and similar results. A proper individualization of the risk and benefits of both techniques is necessary to choose the most appropriate strategy for our patients., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction has proved to be an important predictor of morbidity and mortality in patients with pulmonary embolism (PE). Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) is one of the parameters that have been validated as predictor of outcomes. The aim of our study was to evaluate the performance (sensitivity and specificity) of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) to predict RV dysfunction defined as TAPSE <16 mm., Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of 40 patients prospectively included. Median age was 66 years (59-76) and PESI score was 81 (67-100)., Results: Right ventricular dysfunction was present in 30% of the patients and was associated with higher median troponin values (33.5 ng/L vs 16 ng/L; P= .03). A logarithmic relation was observed between hs-cTnT and lower TAPSE values (r(2)= 0.36; P< .0001). The area under the ROC curve of hs-cTnT to predict RV dysfunction was 0.77 (0.63-0.92)., Conclusion: hs-cTnT is a biomarker with good performance to identify RV dysfunction in PE., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Chest pain represents between 5% and 10% of annual visits to emergency departments (EDs) and near 25% of hospitalizations. Characterization of chest pain is sometimes difficult, and strategies should focus on preventing inappropriate discharge of patients with acute coronary syndrome. The goal of our study is to compare negative predictive value of the algorithm in the chest pain unit using the fourth-generation troponin T assay (4GTT) vs high-sensitivity troponin T assay (HSTT)., Methods: We included 600 patients with probable acute coronary syndrome, who were discharged from the chest pain unit without an acute coronary syndrome: 300 patients in the 4GTT group and 300 patients in the HSTT group. Clinical and laboratory variables were analyzed. All the patients were followed up at 30 days, and the cardiovascular events were recorded., Results: Major cardiac events occurred in only 3 (1.2%) in the HSTT group vs 5 (1.7%) in the 4GTT group (P, nonsignificant). The negative predictive value was 99% in both groups. Emergency department length of stay was 4.3 ± 2.6 hours in HSTT group vs 10 ± 3.4 hours in the 4GTT group (P = .01)., Conclusion: The algorithm in the chest pain unit using HSTT showed to have the same negative predictive value as the algorithm with the 4GTT but with a shorter stay in the ED., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)