Search

Studies performed over the last 10 years have evaluated the role of nitric oxide (NO) in the control of renal hemodynamics. This article reviews the effects of administration of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) blockers on renal function in experimental animals and human volunteers. These studies show that NOS blockade increases renal vascular resistances and decreases the glomerular ultrafiltration coefficient. These experimental studies also support the presence of an important interaction between NO, angiotensin II, and renal nerves in the control of renal function. The use of acute and chronic administration of NOS blockers has generated a great deal of new and exciting information regarding the role of NO in the regulation of normal renal function.

Although excess nitric oxide (NO) production plays a major role in the hypotension characteristic of sepsis, concurrent constitutive NO generation in the kidney during sepsis is essential for preservation of renal perfusion and prevention of glomerular thrombosis. The authors have shown that although all nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitors restore normal blood pressure in lipopolysaccharide (LPS) treated rats, only selective inducible NOS (iNOS) inhibition prevents the reductions in glomerular filtration rate (GFR), whereas nonselective inhibition of NOS further decreases GFR. Glomerular endothelial NOS (eNOS) activity was found to be inhibited by LPS. The decrease in eNOS activity was completely prevented by selective iNOS inhibition in vivo and in vitro. The adverse renal outcomes after LPS administration correlated with decreased glomerular eNOS activity rather than elevated NO production. These findings suggest that the decrease in GFR after LPS is caused by local inhibition of eNOS by iNOS possibly via NO autoinhibition. Selective inhibition of iNOS could represent a substantially superior approach for the treatment of the sepsis syndrome.

Acetaminophen (APAP) is normally metabolized in the liver and kidney by P450 enzymes. No toxicity is observed with therapeutic doses of APAP. However, after ingestion of large quantities of APAP (>2,000 mg/kg), highly reactive quinones, metabolites of APAP, are generated; these react with glutathione and sulfhydryl groups on critical proteins, resulting in cellular dysfunction and hepatic and renal toxicity. The P450 metabolizing enzymes differ somewhat in character between the liver and kidney. Factors that enhance renal toxicity include chronic liver disease, possibly gender, concurrent renal insults, and conditions that alter the activity of P450-metabolizing enzyme systems. Acute renal toxicity is characterized by cellular injury primarily confined to the proximal tubule and significant reductions in glomerular filtration rate. However, there is little evidence that chronic administration of APAP contributes to chronic renal disease and analgesic nephropathy. The only report on this subject suggests that combination therapy with aspirin is required for medullary damage in rats. No evidence exists for the development of chronic analgesic nephropathy with APAP alone. Epidemiologic studies in healthy individuals have failed to demonstrate a significant correlation between APAP use and chronic renal disease and classic analgesic nephropathy. Therefore, large doses of APAP can produce both renal and hepatic failure, but little evidence exists for production of classic analgesic nephropathy with the use of APAP alone.

Nitric oxide (NO) generated from arginine exerts a variety of renal and extrarenal physiological and pathophysiological effects. NO is generated by two types of nitric oxide synthases: acutely responsive, constitutive NOS and slower, more persistent inducible NOS (iNOS). The latter is transcriptionally dependent, often stimulated by cytokines. NO regulates glomerular ultrafiltration, tubular reabsorption, and intrarenal renin secretion; many of these renal effects are mediated by interactions with angiotensin II and adrenergic (alpha 2) activity. Decreased NO activity also enhances tubuloglomerular feedback activity, which could contribute to renal vasoconstriction, NaCl retention, and elevated blood pressure. Loss of renal function could influence NO activity via: (1) endothelial dysfunction; (2) decreased arginine synthesis by kidney; (3) responses to arginine analogs that act as NOS inhibitors; (4) increased cytokine activity; and (5) altered oxidation:reduction status of cells, etc. For example, platelet dysfunction in uremia may be caused by cytokine-induced iNOS activation. Moreover, acutely responsive, constitutive NOS activity may be depressed in progressive loss of renal function. Decreased NO activity might contribute to baroreceptor dysfunction observed in hypertension and progressive renal disease. Studies of the impact of uremia suggest that iNOS may be chronically stimulated by cytokines, whereas acutely responsive, constitutive NOS activity may be concurrently depressed.

Intrarenal and extrarenal humoral factors have been proposed as mediators and modulators of the renal hyperemic response to amino acid infusion. Among the potential modulators, angiotensin II (AII) constitutes the most important candidate due to its critical role in the control of glomerular and tubular function. The modulatory effect of AII has been assessed by (1) measuring the changes in plasma renin activity (PRA)/AII during the normal hyperemic response, and (2) by assessing the levels of PRA/AII and the response to AII-suppressing agents in conditions with no vasodilatory response during amino acid infusion. Administration of a protein load in normal animals or humans does not modify PRA/AII. Absence of a vasodilatory response in various experimental conditions (nitric oxide blockade in normal rats, experimental models of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic glomerulonephritis, cyclosporine administration) is characterized by a significant decrease in proximal tubular reabsorption during amino acid infusion. Converting enzyme inhibitors or AII receptor antagonist restore normal tubular function and the increase in glomerular filtration rate during amino acid infusion. Absence of a vasodilatory response is also associated with increases in kidney AII levels in some of these conditions. These results suggest that (1) AII modulates the amino acid-induced hyperemia through its inhibitory effect on proximal tubular reabsorption and activation of the tubuloglomerular feedback system, and (2) that the expression of the modulatory effect of AII may depend on the interaction between AII and other intrarenal systems like nitric oxide.

Evidence has accumulated that angiotensin II (AII) exerts multiple influences upon renal function through effects on vascular, glomerular, and tubular structures. Infusion of AII alters glomerular ultrafiltration by decreasing nephron plasma flow, increasing glomerular capillary hydrostatic pressure (PG) and the hydrostatic pressure gradient (delta P) due to increases in both afferent and efferent arteriolar vascular resistance, and effecting a reduction in the glomerular ultrafiltration coefficient (LpA), the product of glomerular membrane hydraulic conductivity and effective surface area for ultrafiltration. Spontaneous increases in intrarenal AII generation, such as observed in chronic NaCl depletion, also produce reductions in nephron plasma flow, increases in delta P, and major reductions in LpA. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and saralasin administration prevent these alterations in plasma flow, delta P, and LpA. These AII-induced alterations in LpA may be mediated by AII effects upon the glomerular mesangial cell since AII receptors are expressed and this cell contracts in vitro in the presence of AII. Multiple studies have shown a positive effect of AII (approximately 10(-11) mol/L) on proximal tubular reabsorption, an effect independent of AII effects on peritubular physical factors. These AII effects upon the proximal tubule are clearly independent of interaction with adrenergic influences. AII also influences other mesangial cell functions such as uptake of macromolecules from the circulation. AII also exerts effects by influencing the functional expression of renal adrenergic activity, as demonstrated by studies with renal nerve stimulation in the presence and absence of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and saralasin. Inhibition of AII activity also clearly suppresses tubuloglomerular activity and the PG response to alterations in distal tubular flow rates.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)