Search

Unlabelled: BACKGROUND, & AIMS: Studies of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) phenotypes largely have been performed using small and selected populations. Study size has precluded investigation of important disease subgroups, such as men and young patients. We used a national patient cohort to obtain a better picture of PBC phenotypes., Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study using the United Kingdom-PBC, patient cohort. Comprehensive data were collected for 2353 patients on diagnosis reports, response to therapy with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), laboratory results, and symptom impact (assessed using the PBC-40 and other related measures)., Results: Seventy-nine percent of the patients reported current UDCA, therapy, with 80% meeting Paris response criteria. Men were significantly less likely to have responded to UDCA than women (72% vs 80% response rate; P < .05); male sex was an independent predictor of nonresponse on multivariate analysis. Age at diagnosis was associated strongly and independently with response to UDCA; response rates ranged from 90% among patients who presented with PBC when they were older than age 70, to less than 50% for those younger than age 30 (P < .0001). Patients who presented at younger ages also were significantly more likely not to respond to UDCA therapy, based on alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase response criteria, and more likely to report fatigue and pruritus. Women had mean fatigue scores 32% higher than men's (P < .0001). The increase in fatigue severity in women was related strongly (r = 0.58; P < .0001) to higher levels of autonomic symptoms (P < .0001)., Conclusions: Among patients with PBC, response to UDCA, treatment and symptoms are related to sex and age at presentation, with the lowest response rates and highest levels of symptoms in women presenting at younger than age 50. Increased severity of fatigue in women is related to increased autonomic symptoms, making dysautonomia a plausible therapeutic target., (Copyright © 2013 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Unlabelled: There are no studies regarding to these effects in patients with severe liver dysfunction., Objectives: The aims of this study were to characterize voriconazole hepatotoxicity in patients with severe liver dysfunction and to compare it with a matched cohort treated with liposomal amphotericin B., Methods: This is an observational study, in which adults patients treated with at least 4 doses of voriconazole were included. Patients treated with liposomal amphotericin B were used as control group., Results: Sixty nine percent of patients treated with voriconazole showed changes in liver function tests (LFTs) during therapy. They showed elevated transaminases in 35%, cholestasis in 15% or a combination of both in 45%. According to the CTC classification, all patients with hepatotoxicity had a severe reaction. The Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method score in all patients with hepatotoxicity was greater than 8. There was a correlation between initial loading dose greater than 300 mg (4.5 mg/kg) and the risk of hepatotoxicity (p < 0.001). The control group developed alterations in the LFTs in only 10.3% of patients., Conclusion: Voriconazole should be used with caution in patients with severe liver dysfunction and following liver transplantation, with frequent monitoring of LFTs or using liposomal amphotericin B instead., (Crown Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Budd-Chiari Syndrome (BCS) results from obstruction to hepatic venous outflow, with myeloproliferative disorder (MPD) accounting for up to 40% of cases. A number of BCS cases labelled as "idiopathic" do not fulfill the diagnostic criteria for MPD but have features suggestive of a latent form based on hyperplastic bone marrow and erythroid progenitor cell culture; these cases may subsequently develop overt MPD. A clonal mutation in JAK2 tyrosine kinase (JAK2V617F) occurs in a high proportion of patients with MPD and is of use in the characterization of latent MPD in BCS., Methods: We performed allele-specific polymerase chain reaction to screen for JAK2V617F in subjects with BCS (n = 41) and polycythemia vera (PV) (n = 20) and in hematologically normal controls (n = 27)., Results: AK2V617F was detected in 24 of 41 (58.5%) subjects with BCS, 19 of 20 PV controls, and 0 of 27 hematologically normal controls. Mean hemoglobin concentration and hematocrit were significantly higher in patients with JAK2V617F. Bone marrow was hyperplastic in 16 of 41 subjects (12/16 JAK2V617F positive). Nine of 33 (27.3%) showed endogenous erythroid colony formation (7/9 JAK2V617F positive). Eleven of 41 subjects developed overt MPD (8/11 essential thrombocythemia, 3/11 PV) after the diagnosis of BCS (median, 49 months; range, 8-87 months), and in 90.9% of these JAK2V617F was detected., Conclusions: JAK2V617F occurs in a high proportion of patients with BCS. Latent MPD was missed in a substantial number of our subjects by using standard techniques. Such cases should be screened for JAK2V617F and carefully observed for the subsequent development of overt MPD.

The term "fulminant hepatic failure" (FHF) encompasses a pattern of clinical symptoms and pathophysiological responses associated with rapid arrest of normal hepatic function. The syndrome is defined by the presence of hepatic encephalopathy in association with coagulopathy and jaundice. In many cases, the clinical picture is complicated by cerebral edema, renal impairment, sepsis, and multiorgan failure. In this review, we examine the specific causes of FHF, including acetaminophen-related hepatotoxicity, drug- and viral-related FHF, and other less common causes of FHF such as pregnancy and vascular related disease. The approach to FHF should be multidisciplinary and requires a thorough understanding of the biochemical, metabolic, and physiological changes associated with hepatic necrosis. Also examined are management issues pertinent to these complex situations and the role of liver transplantation and liver assist devices are considered.

Cholestasis is a common finding after liver transplantation and usually signifies graft dysfunction. The most important factor in the evaluation of patients with cholestasis is an awareness of the disorders that commonly arise along a time continuum post-transplant. Therefore, the approach to cholestasis requires a systematic review of biochemical, histological, and radiographic data. This article considers the causes of cholestasis in liver transplant recipients, excluding those associated with biliary anastomotic stricturing. These causes include conditions as diverse as ischemia reperfusion injury, ABO blood group incompatibility, hepatic arterial thrombosis, cytomegalovirus infection, fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis secondary to hepatitis B and C viruses, recurrent primary sclerosing cholangitis, recurrent primary biliary cirrhosis, and chronic rejection. Also examined are management issues pertinent to these conditions and strategies used in preventing or diminishing the effects of cholestasis once established.