Search

A notable challenge faced by pediatric hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic included the need to decrease inpatient census and socially distant non-clinical hospital employees to alternative work arrangements. In doing so, nurses and other clinical care services employees were reassigned to new roles, while others continue to work from home. This paper aims to describe how during the COVID-19 pandemic, a pediatric hospital-based center for nursing research and evidence-based practice used this opportunity to virtually engage staff across the department in topics of clinical inquiry through education sessions, office hours, and individualized/team consultation. Therefore, elevating and increasing the presence of nursing research and evidence-based practice while providing opportunities for the continued professional development of nurses, respiratory therapists, clinical dietitians, child life specialists and employees in neurodiagnostics., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None, (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Magnet®-designated hospitals are seeking to reduce the frequency of falls that lead to injury, which is considered a hospital-acquired condition. Patients with cancer are at high risk to fall, due to multiple factors. Synthesis of the literature supports team efforts and shared learning sessions for patient-care staff as part of the fall prevention process. The purpose was to improve collaboration between Registered Nurses (RNs) and Senior Nurse Aides (SNAs), as well as to enhance their knowledge of fall risk factors and evidence-based prevention guidelines for pediatric oncology patients., Methods: An evidence-based practice project was implemented using a quality improvement pilot based on the Magnet® framework. Oncology RNs and SNAs at a large pediatric hospital were invited to attend one of five educational sessions. Pre-and post-session learning was assessed based on an adapted fall risk knowledge assessment tool., Findings: Thirty participants attended an educational session with 27 (25 RNs and 2 SNAs) matched pre- and post-session assessments. Median post-session assessment scores were statistically significantly higher than pre-session scores (Z =  -3.11, p = 0.001). Overall knowledge scores increased for 63% of participants., Discussion: An educational intervention focused on pediatric oncology nursing enhanced knowledge of patient-care roles and fall prevention efforts, leading to improved fall outcomes., Application to Practice: Ensuring that RNs and SNAs fully embrace their shared role in harm prevention is vital when considering the complexity of delivering nursing care in our current healthcare environment., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The above authors have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Falls are the most frequent adverse events among hospitalised older adults. Previous studies highlighted that older adults might not understand the risk factors associated with falls and may have an altered perception of their actual risk., Aim: To describe differences between perceived and actual physiological risk of falling among older adults and to explore factors associated with the differences., Methods: A prospective cohort study was done. Older adults (age 65 years and above) were interviewed one-to-one at bedside. Morse Fall Scale (MFS) and other risk factors for falls were used to identify the patients' physiological fall risks. Patients' perceived risk of falls were assessed using the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I)., Results: Three hundred patients were recruited. Patients' mean age was 75.3 (SD = ± 6.2). Majority were males (51.7%), lived with others (91.7%), and had received primary school education (35.3%). Based on the MFS, most patients had moderate fall risk (59.7%). Using the FES-I, more than half the patients (59%) interviewed had high concerns about falling. About one-third of the patients' (31.3%) perceived risk matched with their physiological fall risk (Risk-Aware). Half of the patients' perceived risks was higher than their physiological fall risk (50.7%) (Risk-Anxious), while the remaining patients' perceived risks was reported to be lower than their physiological fall risk (18%) (Risk-Taker)., Conclusion: Older patients are poor at recognizing their fall risks. Both patients' perceived and actual fall risks should be evaluated in the inpatient setting in order to inform individualized fall prevention education and strategies., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Pain assessment in children with cognitive impairment (CI) is challenging. A quality improvement (QI) project involving evidence-based review of pain assessment tools, feedback from the Family Advisory Council, trialing of selected tools within clinical settings including obtaining feedback from nurses, and parents caring for nonverbal children with developmental delay was reported. Synthesized evidence supported the adoption of revised Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability pain assessment tool into clinical practice. Results of postimplementation audit and challenges of staff nurse involvement in the QI process were also discussed. The 24-month-long QI process and its impact on changing practice were described in detail., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We report on a quality improvement project whose purpose was to systematically review behavioral pain assessment tools for children who are cognitively impaired, with the goal of identifying a valid and reliable tool for clinical practice. In addition, we sought to partner with parents and/or caregivers to expand their role in pain assessment. The project team conducted an extensive synthesis of the literature to examine the availability and quality of published pain assessment tools for use with children with cognitive impairment (CI) or developmental disability. Once completed, we identified 2 of the available 10 tools to test in the clinical setting. Data from this quality improvement project provided evidence to support the adoption of the revised Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability pain assessment tool for children with CI into clinical practice., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)