1. Safety and Efficacy of One vs Two Incision Broström Gould with Calcaneal Osteotomy and Peroneal Tendon Debridement Surgery.
- Author
-
Scheinberg M, Fortin T, McCrosson M, Zhang TD, Campos J, Bernstein M, and Shah A
- Subjects
- Humans, Retrospective Studies, Male, Female, Adult, Middle Aged, Ankle Joint surgery, Treatment Outcome, Tendons surgery, Postoperative Complications, Lateral Ligament, Ankle surgery, Osteotomy methods, Osteotomy adverse effects, Calcaneus surgery, Debridement methods, Joint Instability surgery
- Abstract
Surgical intervention, such as the Broström-Gould procedure, is typically indicated for patients with chronic lateral ankle instability. In this study, we are comparing the safety and efficacy of the Broström-Gould procedure with peroneal tendon debridement, a sliding lateralizing calcaneal osteotomy, and adjuvant procedures performed with a single- versus double-incision approach. Our retrospective analysis included patients who underwent the procedure of interest between 2011 and 2020. Patients were divided into 2 groups: undergoing either a 1-incision (n = 53) or a 2-incision approach (n = 47), both with a lateralizing calcaneal osteotomy. A significant difference in skin bridge breakdown was observed between the 2-incision (n = 6 [13%]) and 1-incision groups (n = 0 [0%]). There were no significant differences in infection, deep wound dehiscence, nerve palsy, or neuroma between patients in the 2 groups. Furthermore, no statistically significant differences in mean PROMIS scores existed between the cohorts. The described Broström-Gould procedure shows promise for treating chronic ankle instability. While patients in both single- and double-incision groups had similar rates of postoperative complications, the decreased incidence of skin bridge breakdown in the 1incision group highlights the approach's safety and potential benefits in reducing wound-related complications., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF