Search

Background: Conflicting relationships have been described between anemia correction using erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study was undertaken to examine the impact of target hemoglobin level on progression of kidney disease in the CHOIR (Correction of Hemoglobin and Outcomes in Renal Insufficiency) trial., Study Design: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial., Setting & Participants: 1,432 participants with CKD and anemia., Intervention: Participants were randomly assigned to target hemoglobin levels of 13.5 versus 11.3 g/dL with the use of epoetin alfa., Outcomes & Measurements: Cox regression was used to estimate HRs for progression of CKD (a composite of doubling of creatinine level, initiation of renal replacement therapy, or death). Interactions between hemoglobin target and select baseline variables (estimated glomerular filtration rate, proteinuria, diabetes, heart failure, and smoking history) also were examined., Results: Participants randomly assigned to higher hemoglobin targets experienced shorter time to progression of kidney disease in both univariate (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.03-1.52; P = 0.02) and multivariable models (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.00-1.48; P = 0.05). These differences were attributable to higher rates of renal replacement therapy and death for participants in the high hemoglobin arm. Hemoglobin target did not interact with estimated glomerular filtration rate, proteinuria, diabetes, or heart failure (P > 0.05 for all). In the multivariable model, hemoglobin target interacted with tobacco use (P = 0.04) such that the higher target had a greater risk of CKD progression for participants who currently smoked (HR, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.23-5.09; P = 0.01), which was not present for those who did not currently smoke (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.93-1.41; P = 0.2)., Limitations: A post hoc analysis; thus, cause and effect cannot be determined., Conclusions: These results suggest that a high hemoglobin target is associated with a greater risk of progression of CKD. This risk may be augmented by concurrent smoking. Further defining the mechanism of injury may provide insight into methods to optimize outcomes in anemia management., (Copyright © 2012 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Hypertension is common in hemodialysis patients; however, the relationship between interdialytic weight gain (IDWG) and blood pressure (BP) is incompletely characterized. This study seeks to define the relationship between IDWG and BP in prevalent hemodialysis subjects., Study Design, Setting, & Participants: This study used data from 32,295 dialysis sessions in 442 subjects followed up for 6 months in the Crit-Line Intradialytic Monitoring Benefit (CLIMB) Study., Outcomes & Measurements: Mixed linear regression was used to analyze the relationship between percentage of IDWG (IDWG [%] = [current predialysis weight - previous postdialysis weight]/dry weight * 100) as the independent variable and systolic BP (SBP) and predialysis - postdialysis SBP (deltaSBP) as dependent variables., Results: In unadjusted analyses, every 1% increase in percentage of IDWG was associated with a 1.00 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI], +/-0.24) increase in predialysis SBP (P < 0.0001), 0.65 mm Hg (95% CI, +/-0.24) decrease in postdialysis SBP (P < 0.0001), and 1.66 mm Hg (95% CI, +/-0.25) increase in deltaSBP (P < 0.0001). After controlling for other significant predictors of SBP, every 1% increase in percentage of IDWG was associated with a 1.00 mm Hg (95% CI, +/-0.24) increase in predialysis SBP (P < 0.0001) and a 1.08 mm Hg (95% CI, +/-0.22) increase in deltaSBP with hemodialysis (P < 0.0001). However, in subjects with diabetes as the cause of end-stage renal disease, subjects with lower creatinine levels, and older subjects, the magnitude of the association between percentage of IDWG and predialysis SBP was less pronounced. The magnitude of percentage of IDWG on deltaSBP was less pronounced in younger subjects and subjects with lower dry weights. Results were similar with diastolic BP., Limitations: Hemodialysis BP measurements are imprecise estimates of BP and true hemodynamic burden in dialysis subjects., Conclusions: In prevalent hemodialysis subjects, increasing percentage of IDWG is associated with increases in predialysis BP and BP changes with hemodialysis; however, the magnitude of the relationship is modest and modified by other clinical factors. Thus, although overall volume status may impact on BP to a greater extent, day-to-day variations in weight gain have a modest role in BP increases in prevalent subjects with end-stage renal disease.

The occurrence of peripheral vascular disease (PVD) and atraumatic lower-extremity amputations is significantly greater in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) than those with normal renal function. Moreover, the mortality for dialysis patients undergoing atraumatic lower-extremity amputations is far greater. Because PVD requiring amputation is an extreme form of PVD, we tested the hypothesis that mortality and intermediate outcomes for patients with ESRD undergoing lower-extremity revascularization, a less extreme form of PVD, would be equivalent to that for patients without ESRD. This is a retrospective case-control analysis of lower-extremity revascularization in patients with ESRD. Procedures in patients with ESRD were matched with procedures in non-ESRD controls for patient age, sex, race, diabetes mellitus, and hospital setting. Patient survival, graft survival, and limb salvage rates were determined using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Subjective interpretation of functional and symptomatic improvement was determined by telephone interviews with patients or relatives. Thirty-one procedures were performed on 20 patients with ESRD and 64 matched procedures were performed on 57 patients without ESRD. In the ESRD group, median patient survival was 1.72 years compared with 5.17 years for the control group (P < 0.001). Time to 50% limb loss was 1.24 years in the ESRD group and longer than 5.65 years in the control group (P < 0.001). Time to 50% graft patency loss was 0.70 years in the ESRD group and longer than 5.5 years in the control group (P < 0.05). Subjective improvement was less in patients with ESRD. Outcomes of lower-extremity revascularization in patients with ESRD are inferior to those in non-ESRD controls. The mortality rate for patients with ESRD who undergo revascularization is extremely high. Patient-related variables (eg, increased prevalence of hypertension and cardiovascular disease) and/or provider-specific factors (eg, timing of surgery in the course of PVD) may be responsible for poorer outcomes.