Search

Objectives We aimed to investigate the conduction velocity of the cold spinal pathway in healthy humans. Methods Using a cold stimulator consisting of micro-Peltier elements that was able to produce steep cooling ramps up to -300°C/s, we recorded cold-evoked potentials after stimulation of the dorsal midline at C5, T2, T6 and T10 vertebral levels and calculated the conduction velocity of the cold spinal pathway. In all participants, we used laser stimulation to deliver painful heat (Aδ-fibres-mediated) and warm (C-fibres-mediated) stimuli to the same sites in order to compare the conduction velocity of the cold spinal pathway with that of the nociceptive and warm spinal pathways. Results Cold stimulation evoked large-amplitude vertex potentials from all stimulation sites. The mean conduction velocity of the cold spinal pathway was 12.0 m/s, which did not differ from that of the nociceptive spinal pathway (10.5 m/s). The mean conduction velocity of the warm spinal pathway was 2.0 m/s. Discussion This study provides previously unreported findings regarding cold spinal pathway conduction velocity in humans that may be useful in the assessment of spinal cord lesions as well as in intraoperative monitoring during spinal surgery. Significance This neurophysiological study provides previously unreported findings on cold spinal pathway conduction velocity in healthy humans. Cold-evoked potentials may represent an alternative to laser-evoked potential recording, useful to assess spinothalamic tract in patients with spinal cord lesions and monitor patients during spinal surgery.

BACKGROUND In this neurophysiological study, we aimed at verifying the nociceptive selectivity of the new, micropatterned electrode (150IDE), recently designed to generate an electric field limited to the intraepidermal free nerve endings. METHODS Using the new 150IDE, we recorded evoked potentials after stimulation of the face and hand dorsum in 22 healthy participants and in patients with exemplary conditions selectively affecting the nociceptive system. We also measured the peripheral conduction velocity at the upper arm and verified the nociceptive selectivity of 150IDE assessing the effect of a selective block of nociceptive nerve fibres of radial nerve with local anaesthetic infiltration. In healthy participants and in patients, we have also compared the 150IDE-evoked potentials with laser-evoked potentials. RESULTS In healthy participants, the 150IDE-evoked pinprick sensation and reproducible scalp potentials, with latency similar to laser-evoked potentials. The mean peripheral conduction velocity, estimated at the upper arm, was 12 m/s. The selective nociceptive fibre block of the radial nerve abolished the scalp potentials elicited by the 150IDE stimulation. In patients, the 150IDE-evoked potentials reliably detected the selective damage of the nociceptive system. CONCLUSIONS Our neurophysiological study shows that this new 150IDE provides selective information on nociceptive system. SIGNIFICANCE 150IDE is a promising new tool for investigating nociceptive system in patients with neuropathic pain.

Background Patients with joint hypermobility syndrome/Ehlers–Danlos syndrome, hypermobility type (JHS/EDS-HT) commonly suffer from pain. How this hereditary connective tissue disorder causes pain remains unclear although previous studies suggested it shares similar mechanisms with neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia. Methods In this prospective study seeking information on the mechanisms underlying pain in patients with JHS/EDS-HT, we enrolled 27 consecutive patients with this connective tissue disorder. Patients underwent a detailed clinical examination, including the neuropathic pain questionnaire DN4 and the fibromyalgia rapid screening tool. As quantitative sensory testing methods, we included thermal-pain perceptive thresholds and the wind-up ratio and recorded a standard nerve conduction study to assess non-nociceptive fibres and laser-evoked potentials, assessing nociceptive fibres. Results Clinical examination and diagnostic tests disclosed no somatosensory nervous system damage. Conversely, most patients suffered from widespread pain, the fibromyalgia rapid screening tool elicited positive findings, and quantitative sensory testing showed lowered cold and heat pain thresholds and an increased wind-up ratio. Conclusions While the lack of somatosensory nervous system damage is incompatible with neuropathic pain as the mechanism underlying pain in JHS/EDS-HT, the lowered cold and heat pain thresholds and increased wind-up ratio imply that pain in JHS/EDS-HT might arise through central sensitization. Hence, this connective tissue disorder and fibromyalgia share similar pain mechanisms. What does this study add? In patients with JHS/EDS-HT, the persistent nociceptive input due to joint abnormalities probably triggers central sensitization in the dorsal horn neurons and causes widespread pain.

Cardioembolic stroke is generally caused by intracranial artery occlusion. Clots may be identified in the intracranial vessels by means of conventional neuroimaging in the acute phase. High-resolution ultrasonography may show some features suggestive of cardiac emboli when occluding extracranial carotid arteries. We describe a patient with cardioembolic ischemic stroke in the right hemisphere in whom a left internal carotid artery stenosis paradoxically protected the ipsilateral hemisphere from distal intracranial embolism. The patient also presented multiple acute ischemic embolic lesions in the right middle cerebral artery territory and in the right occipital lobe, which was fed by the posterior cerebral artery, anomally originating from the right carotid siphon. Interestingly, the left internal carotid artery--which showed a severe preexisting stenosis--was occluded by the cardiac clot, whereas the right internal carotid artery only presented a moderate stenosis that had probably allowed the clots to pass. Therefore, the severe left internal carotid artery stenosis may have blocked the cardiac embolus, preventing it from reaching the ipsilateral hemisphere.