Search

Purpose: The purpose of the present study is to compare newer designs of various symmetric and asymmetric tibial components and measure tibial bone coverage using the rotational safe zone defined by two commonly utilized anatomic rotational landmarks., Methods: Computed tomography scans (CT scans) of one hundred consecutive patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty were obtained pre-operatively. A virtual proximal tibial cut was performed and two commonly used rotational axes were added for each image: the medio-lateral axis (ML-axis) and the medial 1/3 tibial tubercle axis (med-1/3-axis). Different symmetric and asymmetric implant designs were then superimposed in various rotational positions for best cancellous and cortical coverage. The images were imported to a public domain imaging software, and cancellous and cortical bone coverage was computed for each image, with each implant design in various rotational positions., Results: One single implant type could not be identified that provided the best cortical and cancellous coverage of the tibia, irrespective of using the med-1/3-axis or the ML-axis for rotational alignment. However, it could be confirmed that the best bone coverage was dependent on the selected rotational landmark. Furthermore, improved bone coverage was observed when tibial implant positions were optimized between the two rotational axes., Conclusions: Tibial coverage is similar for symmetric and asymmetric designs, but depends on the rotational landmark for which the implant is designed. The surgeon has the option to improve tibial coverage by optimizing placement between the two anatomic rotational alignment landmarks, the medial 1/3 and the ML-axis. Surgeons should be careful assessing intraoperative rotational tibial placement using the described anatomic rotational landmarks to optimize tibial bony coverage without compromising patella tracking., Level of Evidence: III.

Purpose: The purpose of our study was to compare the accuracy of the rotational position of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty aligned with patient individualized jigs (PSJ) to a gap balancing technique (GBT)., Methods: A consecutive series of 21 osteoarthritic patients were treated with 22 cruciate-retaining total knee prostheses. During surgery, the rotation of the femoral component pinholes was recorded for all knees using PSJ and GBT and transferred to computer tomograms (CT). The rotational differences between PSJ and GBT relative to the transepicondylar axis were analysed., Results: The medium rotation of the femoral component pinholes was 1.3° ± 5.1° (min = -6.3°; max = 14.4°) for PSJ and 0.1 ± 1.4° (min = -1.6°; max = 3.4°) for GBT. Outliers of more than 3° were found more frequently with PSJ in 12 cases but only in one for GBT., Conclusion: Based on our study, we would not recommend relying intra-operatively solely on the CT-based PSJ without the option to adjust or control femoral rotation., Level of Evidence: II.

Objective To define relationships between the frontal sinus opening, ostia of other frontal recess cells, and endoscopic landmarks and to develop a clinically useful framework to guide frontal sinus surgery. Study Design Retrospective review. Setting Tertiary care academic referral center. Methods Adult patients with computed tomography (CT) without sinonasal pathology were included. Virtual endoscopy (using OsiriX) and corresponding CT reconstructions were used to identify all visible ostia in the frontal recess and characterize their positions in spaces between the uncinate/agger nasi (U), bulla ethmoidalis (EB), and middle turbinate (MT). Results Two hundred sides in 100 patients (median age 51 years, 62% female) were analyzed. The "center" of each map was defined as the intersection of spaces between U, EB, and MT. The frontal sinus opening was in the "center" in 53% of frontal recesses, lateral to this position in 29%, and anterior in 11%. When the frontal sinus opening was at the "center," anterior ostia drained frontal Kuhn T cells in 51% and intersinus septal cells in 23%. The skull base attachment of the apical strut of the uncinate process demarcated medial and lateral within the space between U and EB, with the opening to the frontal sinus medial in 68% and lateral in 31%. Left-right asymmetry in frontal sinus openings was noted in 46% of patients. Conclusion Combining preoperative imaging and knowledge of these anatomic relationships may facilitate more efficient frontal outflow tract identification and instrumentation. This represents the first and largest description of ostial configurations relative to endoscopic structural landmarks., Level of Evidence: 4.

Purpose: To correlate the location of the medial patellofemoral ligament femoral fixation site in knees suffering a chronic lateral patellar instability, by using radiographic references and by using the most important anatomic reference point (i.e. the adductor tubercle) identified by means of 3-dimensional (3D) surface reconstructions by computed tomography (CT) imaging., Methods: Thirty consecutive knee 3D-CT examinations at 0º of knee extension were obtained from patients (20 females, 10 males; median age of 23.5 years; range, 14-48 years) treated for chronic lateral patellar instability with at least two documented patellar dislocations. For each knee, three virtual 7-mm-diameter femoral tunnels were created. One of the tunnels used an anatomic fixation landmark (anatomic fixation), while the other two used established radiologic methods. We calculated the percentage of the anatomic tunnel covered by the tunnel created according to the method described by Schoettle, and the percentage of the anatomic tunnel covered by the tunnel created according to the method described by Stephen. These percentages were compared using paired Student's t test., Results: The percentage of anatomic tunnel area covered by the femoral tunnel created using Schoettle's method was 36.7 ± 25.2 %. When using Stephen's method, the percentage of overlap with the anatomic femoral tunnel was 25.5 ± 21.5 %. There were no significant differences between the two radiographic methods (n.s.)., Conclusion: None of the standard radiographic methods allowed a precise anatomic femoral placement. Conventional radiographic identification of the femoral graft placement site is only an approximation and should not be the sole basis for femoral attachment location., Level of Evidence: IV.

Image-guided sensory block and radiofrequency ablation of the nerves innervating the sacro-iliac joint require readily identifiable bony landmarks for accurate needle/electrode placement. Understanding the relative locations of the transverse sacral tubercles along the lateral sacral crest is important for ultrasound guidance, as they demarcate the position of the posterior sacral network (S1-S3 ± L5/S4) innervating the posterior sacro-iliac joint. No studies were found that investigated the spatial relationships of these bony landmarks. The purpose of this study was to visualize and quantify the interrelationships of the transverse sacral tubercles and posterior sacral foramina to inform image-guided block and radiofrequency ablation of the sacro-iliac joint. The posterior and lateral surfaces of 30 dry sacra (15 M/15 F) were digitized and modeled in 3D and the distances between bony landmarks quantified. The relationships of bony landmarks (S1-S4) were not uniform. The mean intertubercular and interforaminal distances decreased from S1 to S4, whereas the distance from the lateral margin of the posterior sacral foramina to the transverse sacral tubercles increased from S1 to S3. The mean intertubercular distance from S1 to S3 was significantly ( p < 0.05) larger in males. The interrelationships of the sacral bony landmarks should be taken into consideration when estimating the site and length of an image-guided strip lesion targeting the posterior sacral network., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.