Search

Hydrogel-encapsulating culture systems for ovarian follicles support the in vitro growth of secondary follicles from various species including mouse, non-primate human, and human; however, the growth of early stage follicles (primary and primordial) has been limited. While encapsulation maintains the structure of early stage follicles, feeder cell populations, such as mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), are required to stimulate growth and development. Hence, in this report, we investigated feeder-free culture environments for early stage follicle development. Mouse ovarian follicles were encapsulated within alginate hydrogels and cultured in various growth medium formulations. Initial studies employed embryonic stem cell medium formulations as a tool to identify factors that influence the survival, growth, and meiotic competence of early stage follicles. The medium formulation that maximized survival and growth was identified as αMEM/F12 supplemented with fetuin, insulin, transferrin, selenium, and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH). This medium stimulated the growth of late primary (average initial diameter of 80 µm) and early secondary (average initial diameter of 90 µm) follicles, which developed antral cavities and increased to terminal diameters exceeding 300 µm in 14 days. Survival ranged from 18% for 80 µm follicles to 36% for 90 µm follicles. Furthermore, 80% of the oocytes from surviving follicles with an initial diameter of 90-100 µm underwent germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD), and the percentage of metaphase II (MII) eggs was 50%. Follicle/oocyte growth and GVBD/MII rates were not significantly different from MEF co-culture. Survival was reduced relative to MEF co-culture, yet substantially increased relative to the control medium that had been previously used for secondary follicles. Continued development of culture medium could enable mechanistic studies of early stage folliculogenesis and emerging strategies for fertility preservation., (© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Paclitaxel (T), etoposide (E), and cisplatin (P) are each active in gastric carcinoma, either as single agents or as part of a multidrug regimen. To the authors' knowledge, the combination of these three agents in the treatment of patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal carcinoma has not been previously studied., Methods: Previously untreated patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the stomach, esophagus, or gastroesophageal (GE) junction received at least 2 cycles of TPE administered twice weekly for 3 weeks, with the cycle repeated every 28 days. Drug doses, administered over 3 hours on either Monday and Thursday or Tuesday and Friday, consisted of T 50 mg/m2/dose, P 15 mg/m2/dose, and E 40 mg/m2/dose. For patients with local disease only, subsequent therapy consisted of radiation with or without surgical resection., Results: Twenty-five patients with gastric (10) or gastroesophageal or GE junction (15) carcinoma were treated. Eighteen had locally advanced disease and 7 had liver metastases at presentation. Hematologic toxicity, namely, Grade 3 anemia and neutropenia, was experienced by all patients. The median number of treatment cycles was 4 (range, 2-6). Three patients were not evaluable for response. All 22 evaluable patients responded; 3 were complete responders and 19 were partial responders. Eleven patients received radiation therapy with (6) or without (5) concomitant 5-fluorouracil, and 8 patients subsequently underwent surgical resection. Three of 8 patients had no tumor at surgery, 4 had minimal microscopic tumor at the primary site, and 3 had microscopic lymph node involvement. Twenty-three patients are alive, of whom 14 are without evidence of disease. Two patients with metastatic disease at presentation died at 9 and 29 months, respectively. The median survival was 12.5 months (range, 6 to 30+ months)., Conclusions: Multifractionated TPE chemotherapy is a highly active regimen in gastric and gastroesophageal carcinoma. It could be evaluated in Phase III trials against other active regimens for the treatment of patients with this disease. The introduction of 5-fluorouracil could also be an interesting direction to explore because of its primary role in the treatment of patients with gastric and esophageal carcinoma.

Background: The costs of infusion versus bolus administration of chemotherapy has been a point of controversy as has been the method of quantitating the cost. The present study analyzes the reimbursement for chemotherapy administration by infusion compared with bolus delivery based on reimbursement and relates this to cost based on projected charges and actual charges in a private practice setting., Methods: Actual reimbursement records were retrieved for selected patients receiving infusion or bolus administration of specific chemotherapy regimens for three tumors: colon carcinoma, breast carcinoma, and lymphoma. All services were included except for radiology and hospitalization. Medicare reimbursement represented 90% of the treatment cycles analyzed., Results: Actual reimbursement per month for each infusion regimen was as follows: colon carcinoma, $528 (5-fluorouracil [5-FU]); breast carcinoma, $621 (doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide [AC]) and $685 (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil [CMF]); and lymphoma, $603 (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone [CHOP]). Actual reimbursement per month for a bolus regimen was colon carcinoma, $393 (5-FU + leucovorin); breast carcinoma, $991 (AC) or $453 (CMF); and lymphoma, $749 (CHOP). Actual reimbursement represents 21-36% of actual charges. Projected charges based on the model system are generally less than the actual charges., Conclusions: The cost of chemotherapy as defined by reimbursement are substantially less than actual charges and are also less than projected costs based on charges. Data comparing bolus versus infusion reimbursement costs for colon carcinoma, breast carcinoma, and lymphoma indicate that differences between reimbursement for bolus and infusion administration are not substantial.

Background: The cost of infusional administration of cancer chemotherapy has been assumed to be more expensive than the traditional bolus schedule related to the use of durable medical equipment and other components of the delivery system. The objective was to develop a model of projected charges as a basis for the cost estimate for selected common chemotherapy regimens comparing the cost based on charges for bolus and infusional chemotherapy schedules., Methods: Chemotherapy programs using either bolus or infusional delivery were selected representing standard or commonplace regimens for the treatment of patients with breast cancer (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil [CMF] or CA); colon cancer (5-fluorouracil[5-FU] infusion vs. 5-FU bolus + leucovorin [LCVI] or lymphoma (cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunomycin, Oncovin (vincristine), prednisone [CHOP] or CDE [cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide]). Cost projections were estimated based on charges and were calculated in a model system using six charge (cost) centers including medical doctor [MD] and/or clinic visit; laboratory; drug cost based on average wholesale price (AWP); cost of disposables; and pump rental fee. Standard dosages were applied for each regimen using total mg/M2 for a 1.5 M2 person., Results: Projected charges or chemotherapy for colon cancer (5-FU infusion vs. 5-FU + LCV) are variable depending on the LCV dose and the infusion duration. The longer infusion duration or higher doses of LCV result in a 40 to 50% increment in monthly charges excluding cost related to toxicity. For breast cancer, the charges for bolus or infusion administration CMF are similar, but for CA bolus charges are higher than infusion charges related to higher drug doses. For lymphoma, CHOP chemotherapy dosage costs are approximately half of those for CDE infusion related to the specific drug regimen and drug dosage used., Conclusions: The perception that infusional delivery of chemotherapeutic agents adds to the cost of cancer care is appropriate for some regimens but the absolute amount of cost increment is generally modest. The principle cost differences between bolus and infusional schedules relate to drug dosage and the toxicity profile. Generally, but not consistently, infusional schedules use lesser doses and are associated with lesser toxicity. Although the benefit of infusional delivery of chemotherapy in terms of response rates and survival are comparable to bolus schedules for 5-FU infusion and 5-FU + LCV in colon cancer, this has not been established for the regimens analyzed for breast cancer (CMF, CA) or lymphoma (CDE, CHOP). The misperception of cost advantages for bolus delivery should not preclude comparative trials of bolus versus infusional chemotherapy schedules and cost should be studied prospectively in clinical trials comparing different schedules of administration in addition to studies of quality of life and toxicity.

Background: Ifosfamide and carboplatin are agents that have completed Phase I studies using a continuous infusion schedule for as long as 14 days. The in vitro compatibility of the two drugs allows for the simultaneous administration in an admixture, and a pilot study was undertaken to determine the feasibility and tolerability of the infusion schedule for the combination., Methods: Ifosfamide at 500 mg/M2/day and carboplatin at 15 or 20 mg/M2/day were administered for 14-day cycles repeated at 28 days in 29 patients, with a total of 60 courses administered., Results: Total cumulative dose per cycle was: ifosfamide 7.0 g/M2 and carboplatin 210-280 mg/M2. Hematuria developed in five patients, four of whom had prior urologic disease, severe thrombocytopenia, or pelvic radiation. In all patients, the hematuria was transient and inconsequential despite the absence of mesna. Grade 3 or 4 leukopenia was observed in eight patients with or without thrombocytopenia and delayed subsequent treatment cycles. Thrombocytopenia was less frequent (Grade 3, 2 patients: Grade 4, 1 patient). No significant episodes of sepsis or hemorrhage were noted. Anemia requiring transfusion developed in 12 of 29 patients. Twenty-one of the 29 patients had received prior chemotherapy. Five of seven previously untreated patients with non-small cell lung cancer achieved a complete (1) or partial (4) response., Conclusions: A continuous 14-day infusion of ifosfamide admixed with carboplatin is feasible in an ambulatory setting with no need for adding mesna for urologic protection and full dosage administration for each agent. Phase 2 studies in non-small cell lung cancer would be reasonable at the optimal doses of ifosfamide 500 mg/M2/day and carboplatin 15 mg/M2/day, and the potential exists for the introduction of additional agents, such as etoposide.

Ifosfamide-associated central nervous system toxicity has been reported in 5% to 30% of patients treated with ifosfamide. Its pattern is characterized by metabolic encephalopathy with confusion, blurred vision, mutism, auditory or visual paranoid hallucinations, seizures, and rarely coma. The biochemical cause of the neurotoxicity is not understood completely, but it is thought to result from an accumulation of drug metabolites with direct central nervous system effects. A case of ifosfamide neurotoxicity is reported that had unusual extrapyramidal features in a patient treated with a 5-day course of infused ifosfamide. Although usually spontaneously reversible with cessation of drug administration, ifosfamide neurotoxicity occasionally has been associated with prolonged psychopathologic sequelae. Death from irreversible encephalopathy has also been reported rarely. The authors believe that classic extrapyramidal symptoms should be considered to be a part of the neurotoxic profile of ifosfamide.

A case of a 26-year-old woman with metastatic choriocarcinoma and clinical and biochemical thyrotoxicosis is described. This represents the eighth reported case of the association of choriocarcinoma and thyrotoxicosis. Serial monitoring of serum thyroxine (T4) and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) levels correlated precisely with the beta sub-unit human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) level and the quantitation of host tumor burden. The development of a hypermetabolic syndrome in patients with choriocarcinoma may be due to secondary thyrotoxicosis from either the TSH-like activity of hCG or from the concomitant production of molar thyrotropin by the tumor.