Search

Background Current research suggests that depression and anxiety may be common problems in women with the fragile X (FMRI) premutation. Methods To learn more about this in a clinical setting, we asked 33 women with the FMRI premutation and 20 women without the FMRI premutation to complete the Brief Carroll Depression Scale (Brief CDS) and the Multidimensional Anxiety Questionnaire (MAQ) and to provide information about mental health medication use. Questionnaire findings were compared between groups and with normative samples. Trinucleotide (CGG) repeat counts were also correlated to checklist findings. Results Both women with the FMRI premutation and the comparison group had high current mental health medication use ( 33 % vs. 35 %). Approximately 1 / 3 of the women from both groups had high Brief CDS Total T-scores ( 33 % vs. 30 %). More women with the FMRI premutation had at least one elevated MAQ Total or sub-scale T-score than the comparison group ( 39 % vs. I0%, P = 0.03). Twenty-one per cent of women with the FMRI premutation had all three of the indicators of distress targeted in this study vs. none of the women in the comparison samples (P I00 CGG repeats (5 7 %) had an elevated Brief CDS Total T-score than women with ≤I00 CGG repeats ( 1 6%) (P= 0 . 02 ). More women with >I00 CGG repeats also had all three indicators of anxiety and depression (P = 0.03). Conclusions Women with the FMRI premutation appear to have a high incidence of depression and increased symptoms of anxiety. Screening tools like the Brief CDS and the MAQ may be useful to identify these women in the clinic setting. Positive identification could lead to increased mental health care and treatment.

This study explored age preferences about when to learn at-risk status and have carrier testing in women who were undergoing testing for fragile X. Forty-two women (20 carriers and 22 noncarriers) completed a structured interview prior to carrier testing and after learning their result. The majority favored learning at-risk status and carrier status at18 years for themselves and their children. Preferred ages fell into four developmental categories: early childhood (0-9), preteen (10-13), teen (14-17), and adult (or= 18). Although no significant mean changes in age responses were found between interviews or between carrier and noncarrier responses, a difference in the pattern of responses related to age categories was suggested. There appeared to be an increase in the number of responses in the 0-9 category at time 2. Also, the mean ages for testing were older than they were for telling at time 1, but not at time 2. For women indicating ages 0-9, the most frequent reason was to provide children with time to adjust. Those reporting ages 10-13 felt that the onset of puberty as well as a child's ability to understand, adjust, and cope were key determinants. Those preferring the teen years felt the possibility of sexual activity and planning for the future were important considerations. The developmental focus for adults was serious relationships. This study, through its unique longitudinal perspective of transition from uncertainty to certainty, builds on prior knowledge, has implications for genetic counseling, and suggests that the developmental stage of the child is important in determining when to tell and test.

Fragile X syndrome is the leading form of hereditary mental retardation, but the condition is still underdiagnosed in young children. Because of concern that the fragile X phenotype is subtle in young boys and therefore contributes to underdiagnosis of the disorder, we evaluated 73 boys (36 with fragile X and 37 same-age boys who were fragile X negative) using a checklist that we devised to learn which characteristics might be the most useful for alerting professionals to this diagnosis. After a multiple comparisons adjustment, only 4 of 42 characteristics differed significantly in their distributions between the two groups of boys (P < 0.0012), but 10 other items may also have predictive value for fragile X syndrome (P < 0.01). Four additional items occurred in at least 80% of boys with fragile X and may also be helpful for the clinician. Professionals who work with developmentally delayed children should be aware of these 18 clinical characteristics and some of the behavior characteristics commonly seen in boys with fragile X so that they can readily diagnose patients.

The purpose of the study was to explore self-concept in women at risk for inheriting the fragile X mutation. Time 1 measures were obtained prior to carrier testing and Time 2 measures were collected approximately 5 months after learning carrier status. The sample consisted of 42 women from 17 families. Measures included the Tennessee Self-Concept Scale (TSCS), the fragile X Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and a structured interview. The TSCS provided a global measure of self-concept and the fragile X VAS and structured interview provided a contextual measure of self related to carrier status. Results indicated that there were no differences initially between carriers and noncarriers and no change from Time 1 to Time 2 on the TSCS. Analysis of the Time 1 fragile X VAS means for the total sample found a reduction in positive feelings about self. Analysis of the Time 2 fragile X VAS found that noncarriers reported improvement in feelings about self, with no change in feelings about self found in the carriers. Responses from the structured interview indicated that the feelings regarding self in the context of genetic testing are not related to global self-concept, but result from concerns regarding the implications of a positive carrier test for themselves and their families. This information highlights areas related to carrier testing that warrant further investigation and may ultimately result in modifications to the genetic counseling. Am. J. Med. Genet. 92:336–342, 2000. © 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

This paper reports the results of a longitudinal study of women at-risk to inherit the fragile X mutation. It addresses 1) how upsetting the women perceived their carrier information to be, 2) how serious a problem they perceive fragile X syndrome to be, and 3) descriptions of feelings about the carrier testing process. The study sample consisted of 42 women (20 carriers and 22 non-carriers). There were two measurement times (just prior to carrier testing and after learning actual carrier status). The measures used were a Fragile X Visual Analog Scale and a structured interview. At time 1, being at-risk was reported to be upsetting and fragile X syndrome was perceived to be a serious problem. For the women found to be carriers there was no change from time 1 to time 2 on any of the items. Significant change occurred in the non-carriers. They were significantly less upset at time 2 after receiving the results of their carrier test than at time 1. They also perceived fragile X syndrome to be a more serious problem than they did at time 1 and a more serious problem than the carriers at time 2. Themes found included concerns that carrier status for fragile X syndrome presented a barrier for having healthy biological children and concern for children's and grandchildren's adaptation to their own carrier status. Coping behaviors were activated to manage the emotions related to these concerns. The coping behaviors identified were minimization, acceptance of the possibility of being a carrier, a sense of being able to deal with the outcome of the carrier test, positive comparison, problem solving, and positive interpretation. © 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Sixty-five parents of individuals affected by fragile X syndrome who attended the National Fragile X Conference in Portland, Oregon (1996), were asked to complete a survey assessing parental level of concern about carrier testing in children at risk for fragile X syndrome. All subjects completed a 15-item paper and pencil Likert response scale measure that was developed specifically for this study. The items included parental rights and duties, psychological adjustment, adaptation, discrimination, harm, childbearing, and interpersonal relationships. The major concern of the parents was that their children have knowledge of their carrier status prior to becoming sexually active and that their children be able to marry informed of their genetic risk. Mothers were significantly more concerned than fathers about raising their children with the knowledge of their carrier status. A sense of parental right to make the decision regarding carrier testing for children was associated with concerns about (1) behavioral or educational problems, (2) knowledge of carrier status prior to sexual activity or marriage, and (3) adjustment of the children to knowledge of their carrier status. As the sample was drawn from a unique population of parents, the results of this survey should be interpreted with caution. The findings of this study suggest a model of parents providing anticipatory guidance for their children to help them adjust to carrier information and for their children to have this knowledge prior to the possibility of reproduction. Am. J. Med. Genet. 82:206–211, 1999. © 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Fragile X DNA studies were carried out on all obligate carriers of a large fragile X family with 10 mentally retarded individuals. One 64-year-old carrier man with an altered FMR-1 allele was not described as being mentally retarded or as having any limitations in function. He was married, raised 8 children, and worked as an auto mechanic. On examination, he had macrocephaly and mild macroorchidism but few of the other typical physical findings of males with fragile X syndrome. His Full Scale IQ is 73, and his Vineland Adaptive Behavior Composite is 73. On the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery-Revised, he achieved standard scores of 64 in Reading, 55 in Math, and 83 in Knowledge. His DNA findings showed a broad smear on Southern blot analysis of 100-500 CGG repeats and no methylation at the EagI site upstream of the FMR-1 protein coding region. His FMR-1 protein production is 12% of normal. His daughters all have large premutations, with somatic instability in the size of the CGG repeat lengths. They all have evidence of academic underachievement and 2 have physical characteristics frequently described in individuals with fragile X.

In 1980, Turner et al. described a sample of females affected with fragile X syndrome and recommended that all females with mental retardation of unknown etiology be evaluated for this condition. Since then, much has been learned about fragile X syndrome and its effects on females. Although research has primarily focused on abnormal cognitive and emotional findings in a proportion of women, studies have also addressed the physical characteristics and specific findings of young girls. Some of the early results were puzzling because so little was understood about the genetics of this condition, but much has become clear since the gene was sequenced in 1991. Many questions about this condition are still unanswered, but are likely to be addressed in the near future. This article highlights major advances made during the past 10 years with regard to females having fragile X syndrome. © 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mothers of 38 young girls with fragile X [fra (X)] between the ages of 4 and 11 years filled out the Child Behavior Checklist. Forty-seven percent of the girls had T scores greater than 70 on the hyperactive and social withdrawal scales. Between 26% and 15% of the girls also had high T scores on the depressed scale, on the schizoid-obsessive scale (for 6 to 11 year olds), on the schizoid or anxious scale (for 4 and 5 year olds), and on the aggressive scale. Although a high score on a scale of the Child Behavior Checklist does not constitute a medical diagnosis, it can alert clinicians to abnormal behaviors that warrant further assessment. These behaviors may also alert the clinician to the possibility of fra(X) syndrome when they are seen in their patients. The high percentage of girls with fra(X), who seem to have abnormal behaviors, provides good reason to diagnose them in their early years, not just for genetic counseling purposes, but so that they can receive appropriate intervention services.

We report on 4 individuals with the fragile X [fra(X)] syndrome and the Robin sequence (or elements of that sequence). To our knowledge, this association has been described in only one other boy. However, males with the fra(X) syndrome have been reported to have an increased incidence of cleft palate. We recommend that children with a cleft palate or the Robin sequence be assessed for developmental delays and a family history of mental retardation. The fra(X) syndrome may be one of the genetic causes of the Robin sequence and, when indicated, children with the sequence should be tested for fra(X).

We report on 2 children with Townes-Brocks syndrome (TBS) and mental retardation. One child had mild hearing loss, but the other only had hearing loss at 8000 Hz. These cases suggest that there may be an increased incidence of mental retardation in individuals with TBS.