Samantha Hartley, Charley Baker, Michael Birtwhistle, Jennifer L. Burgess, Eleanor Chatburn, Laurence Cobbaert, Maddie Howley, Charlotte Huggett, Charlie MacKenzie‐Nash, Alice Newton, Sarah Parry, Jee Smith, Christopher D. J. Taylor, Peter James Taylor, and Robyn Timoclea
Background: There is a wealth of evidence to suggest that the Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD, or similar Emotionally Unstable Personality Disorder, EUPD) construct is harmful. We provide a commentary on the ideas expressed in the May Debate issue, highlighting both concerns and alternatives. Method: We bring together lived experience, clinical, and research expertise. This commentary was written collaboratively drawing on all these sources of evidence. Results: We outline evidence that the BPD construct is invalid, harmful, not necessary for effective treatment and a potential block to the development and evaluation of alternatives. Conclusions: We ask readers to consider these concerns, perspectives, and ideas.