Search

It is known that nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs such as indomethacin can attenuate the pharmacologic effect of loop diuretics such as furosemide and ethacrynic acid and that indomethacin may also reduce the pharmacologic response to chlorothiazide. To examine further this potential drug-drug interaction, we administered 50- an 100-mg single oral doses of hydrochlorothiazide with and without indomethacin to 10 healthy, normal subjects. We observed no significant influence of indomethacin to 10 healthy, normal subjects. We observed no significant influence of indomethacin either on the pharmacokinetics of hydrochlorothiazide or the pharmacologic response to this diuretic. The adsorption and disposition of hydrochlorothiazide demonstrate that this drug is rapidly absorbed and produces a diuretic and natriuretic response that peaks at approximately 2 hours after dosing and is essentially terminated 12 hours after dosing. There appeared to be no greater pharmacologic response to the 100-mg than to the 50-mg hydrochlorothiazide dose in the ten subjects in this study.

The biliary secretion of sulindac and metabolites after a single 400 mg oral dose of the drug was studied in 3 elective gallbladder surgical patients following placement of an occludable T-tube in the common bile duct. Bile and systemic plasma were sampled at frequent intervals for up to 36 h postdose. The apparent biliary clearance (Vcl,bile) of the prodrug sulindac is about 25 times greater than that of the pharmacologically active sulfide metabolite. The total biliary flux of drug in normal man with an uninterrupted enterohepatic cycle, calculated from Vcl,bile and historic mean plasma drug AUCinfinity0 values, averages 144 and 12.2 per cent of the dose as sulindac and the sulfide metabolite, respectively. Thus, enterohepatic recycling of the drug in man is principally in the form of the prodrug which not only limits exposure of the intestine to the active moiety but also sustains systemic concentrations of active drug upon reabsorption of the prodrug.

Gastric injury resulting from nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is thought to require direct contact of the drug with the gastric mucosa. An inactive form of a drug (as a prodrug) should protect against mucosal damage. Because sulindac sulfoxide has little effect on prostaglandin synthesis until it is reduced to sulindac sulfide after absorption, we performed a double-blind, crossover endoscopic study in 15 normal subjects to compare the prodrug sulindac sulfoxide (200 mg b.i.d.), the active sulfide metabolite sulindac sulfide (100 mg b.i.d., which yields similar sulfide blood concentrations), a positive control (aspirin, 650 mg q.i.d.), and a negative control (placebo). Each drug was taken for 1 week and gastric mucosa were endoscopically assessed before and after 2, 5, and 7 days of dosing. Aspirin predictably damaged the gastric mucosa, whereas the effects of sulindac sulfoxide and sulindac sulfide could not be distinguished from those of the placebo. We conclude that sulindac sulfoxide as a prodrug is not directly responsible for the reduced severity of gastric mucosal lesions. Both sulindac sulfoxide and sulindac sulfide are poorly soluble in acid gastric contents and the reduced damage may relate to the inability of high concentrations of the drug to enter gastric mucosal cells.

The effects of diflunisal, a nonacetylated difluorinated salicylate, on platelet function were compared with those of aspirin and placebo. In a randomized, double-blind trial, normal subjects were given diflunisal, 250, 500, or 1,000 mg twice daily; aspirin, 650 or 1,300 mg twice daily; or placebo for 8-day periods. Difunisal, 250 mg, had no effect on platelet function, whereas 500 mg induced minimal inhibition of colagen-induced release of platelet serotonin, and 1,000 mg inhibited platelet malondialdehyde production, moderately prolonged template bleeding times (P = NS), and increased fecal blood loss (P less than 0.05). In contrast, aspirin, 650 mg, markedly inhibited collagen-induced platelet aggregation and serotonin release, and 1,300 mg prolonged bleeding time (P less than 0.01) and increased fecal blood loss (P less than 0.01). The effects of aspirin lasted for up to 5 days, whereas changes induced by diflunisal had returned to baseline 24 hr after the drug was discontinued. We conclude that in doses in the same range as those of aspirin diflunisal inhibits platelet function less.

Indacrinone, a racemic mixture, is a loop-blocking diuretic with effects on uric acid elimination that differ from those of furosemide. A series of studies in healthy men was undertaken to characterize the pharmacologic activity of the positive (+) and negative (-) enantiomers (E) of indacrinone and its (-) p-OH metabolite, (-) MET. All subjects were on sodium- and potassium-controlled diet; each experiment was similar in design and included placebo and positive controls. Oral (-)E and (-)MET exerted dose-related natriuretic and diuretic effects; intravenous doses of (-)E were more effective than (-)MET. The effects of (-)E and (-)MET on serum uric acid were the same as those reported with indacrinone. After (-)E, both (-)E and generated (-)MET appeared to contribute to the natriuresis. (+)E induced dose-related decreases in serum uric acid up to 24 hr after dosage; at the higher doses of (+)E, the hypouricemic effects were of the order of those after 500 mg of probenecid. Thus, indacrinone is a novel loop diuretic with enantiomers and a (-)MET, each of which has a different pharmacologic profile.

Four subjects were studied by continuous intraduodenal sampling to establish the existence and determine the extent of enterohepatic recirculation of sulindac and its sulfide and sulfone metabolites. Sulindac, 200 mg by mouth, was given every 12 hr for 7 days. After the last dose was given intraduodenally, constant duodenal infusion of a nutrient mixture and sampling of duodenal contents were performed through a triple-lumen intraduodenal tube for 12 hr. Calculation of nonabsorbed drug in the samples and quantitation of drug and metabolite levels in the biliary secretions were made possible by nonabsorbable markers in the drug solution and in the infusate. Interindividual variations in the absolute values for each of the chemical species were over a 200% range, but for each subject relative clearances were in a remarkably constant ratio, averaging 1:12:12 for sulfide:sulindac:sulfone. Total biliary excretions of the prodrug (sulindac) and active pharmacophore (sulfide) calculated from these biliary clearances and historic mean plasma AUCs were 136% and 22% of dose. Thus, there is a correlation between data in man and those in five other species and the data established that, after sulindac, the contribution of enterohepatic circulation to conservation of the active pharmacophore is achieved predominantly at the level of inactive prodrug.

Two osmotically driven, controlled-release dosage forms of indomethacin were evaluated in a multiple-dose crossover study in 12 healthy subjects. Following equivalent daily doses, less frequent dosing of both controlled-release forms resulted in plasma concentration profiles that are more uniform than those following capsule regimens. After the first day, morning predose plasma levels wer significantly higher for the controlled-release treatments. Renal clearances were similar between days and among treatments. Total urinary recoveries were comparable for all regimens.

The oral dose response and time course of action of indacrinone was compared with that of furosemide in six healthy men on a sodium and potassium-controlled diet. The single doses were 5, 10, 20, 40, and 80 mg indacrinone and 20, 40, and 80 mg furosemide. Diuretic, natriuretic, and kaliuretic effects revealed that indacrinone was more potent, had a longer duration of action, and induced a greater sodium for equivalent potassium loss during its period of peak activity than furosemide. During the 8 hr after drug, all doses of indacrinone decreased serum uric acid levels and increased uric acid clearance while furosemide generally increased serum uric acid and decreased uric acid clearance. After 24 hr, serum uric acid and uric acid clearance were the same for the two drugs. A rise in plasma renin activity was observed 2 hr after an 80-mg dose of furosemide but not after indacrinone.

Timolol, like propranolol, is a nonselective beta-adrenergic blocker, but it is much less lipid soluble and is formulated as a single enantiomer rather than a racemic mixture. We examined the effects of such differences on bioavailability, systemic clearance, and pharmacologic response. Ten healthy subjects received placebo, 0.2 mg/kg IV propranolol, 3.2 mg/kg oral propranolol, 0.025 mg/kg IV timolol, and 0.4 mg/kg oral timolol in double-blind, randomized crossover fashion. Plasma concentrations of total drug were monitored up to 8 hr, while responses to submaximal exercise were measured at 0, 2, and 6 hr. Timolol had greater bioavailability (F = 0.61 +/- 0.06(SEM) and 0.32 +/- 0.04) and lower systemic clearance (463 +/- 74 ml kg-1 hr-1 and 1040 +/- 120 ml kg-1 hr-1) than propranolol. Half-lifes were of the same order (2.7 and 2.9 hr). There was a marginal correlation between areas under the intravenous and oral plasma concentration-time curves for timolol (r = 0.66, P = 0.054), but none for propranolol (r = 0.48, P NS). There were also correlations of the response (percent reduction in heart rate) to oral and intravenous timolol at 2 hr (r = 0.72, P less than 0.05) and 6 hr (r = 0.84, P less than 0.01) hr, but none between responses to oral and intravenous propranolol. Finally, the response to oral timolol was related to the area under its plasma concentration-time curve, whereas that to propranolol was not. We conclude that the physicochemical properties of timolol lead to greater bioavailability. Pharmacologic response to an oral dose of timolol, unlike that to propranolol, can be predicted from the response to an intravenous dose and reflects its plasma concentration.

In normal humans sulindac, a prodrug, undergoes two major biotransformations: irreversible oxidation to the inactive sulfone metabolite and reversible reduction to the pharmacologically active sulfide metabolite. To assess any effect of end-stage renal failure on sulindac biotransformation, six patients were given 200 mg sulindac orally. Plasma was sampled over 24 hours. Protein binding of sulindac and metabolites was determined by equilibrium dialysis. Results were compared with historic controls. AUC(0-12) for sulindac and the sulfone were similar to controls. AUC(0-12) for the sulfide was significantly reduced to 4.85 micrograms X hr/ml from 13.1 micrograms X hr/ml (P less than 0.02). Protein binding of all three compounds was significantly reduced by renal failure. When corrected for protein binding, the AUC(0-12) for sulindac and the sulfone was twice that of controls whereas that of the sulfide was 42 ng X hr/ml compared with 83 ng X hr/ml in normal individuals (P less than 0.001). This suggests that end-stage renal failure impairs the reduction of sulindac to the active sulfide whereas oxidation to the sulfone is intact.