Search

Aim To review our experience in the management of retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPSs) in a single institution, with a predominantly Asian population, and identify associated prognostic factors for overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and local recurrence. Materials and methods All RPSs diagnosed and managed at our center between January 2000 and March 2014 were included. Exclusion criteria included patients whose medical records were untraceable and patients who underwent biopsy but did not undergo resection. The variables studied were age, gender, histological subtype, tumor size, tumor grade, surgical margins, type of presentation of tumor (primary or recurrent) and presence of contiguous organ resection. The primary outcome measured was OS. Results Eighty-five patients underwent resection of RPS with curative intent. Eight patients underwent adjuvant chemotherapy and 15 patients underwent radiotherapy. The median DFS was 21 months (range: 0–146) and median OS was 45 months (range: 1–233). On univariate analysis, resection margin (P = 0.04), tumor grade (P = 0.011) and type of presentation of tumor (P = 0.007) were found to significantly affect OS. Patients with tumor adherent to contiguous organs had a greater OS as compared to patients with tumor invasive into the contiguous organs (P = 0.02). Conclusion An aggressive surgical approach in primary and recurrent RPS is associated with good OS. Complete resection, with contiguous organ resection if necessary should be performed to achieve microscopically negative surgical margins to allow for long-term survival. However, tumor biology remains the main determinant for OS.

Aim A nomogram for prediction of 12-year sarcoma-specific survival has been developed based on patients with soft tissue sarcomas treated in Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC). We aim to evaluate the predictive accuracy of the MSKCC sarcoma nomogram in a cohort of patients treated at an Asian institution. This has not been validated in an Asian population and thus its universal applicability remains unproven. Materials and methods Between 1990 and 2013, 840 adult patients underwent treatment for primary soft tissue sarcoma (STS) at the National Cancer Centre Singapore. Patients who presented with locally recurrent or metastatic disease were excluded from the analysis. The variables included in the MSKCC nomogram included age at diagnosis, tumor size, histologic grade, histologic subtype, depth and site. A total of 399 patients were left for analysis. The nomogram was validated by assessing its extent of discrimination and level of calibration. Results All patients had deep tumors. Disease occurred most commonly in the lower extremity (n = 149 [37.3%]), the most common histologic subtype was “Others” (angiosarcoma, ewing's sarcoma, endometrial stromal sarcoma, sarcoma NOS [not otherwise specified] and rhabdomyosarcoma). Sixty-four percent of all patients had high-grade tumors while 36% had low-grade tumors. The median patient age at diagnosis was 54 years (range: 17–88 years). The median follow up time for all patients and surviving patients were 29 (range: 1–174) and 33 (range: 1–157) months, respectively. The observed 5- and 10-year sarcoma-specific survival were 55% and 33%, respectively. The concordance index was 0.71. For level of calibration, the observed correspondence between predicted and actual outcomes suggest that the MSKCC nomogram generally predicts well for patients with higher survival probability, but consistently overpredicts survival for the other groups, in our cohort of patients. Conclusion The MSKCC sarcoma nomogram was found to be accurate in terms of extent of discrimination. In terms of level of calibration, it generally predicts well for patients with higher survival probability, but consistently overpredicts survival for the other groups in our population.

AIM This study aims to review patient and disease factors that predict survival after palliative surgery for intestinal perforation from metastases in advanced malignancies, with a goal to help decision-making in this clinical scenario. Secondary aims include validation of the UC Davis Cancer Centre nomogram to predict risk of 30-day morbidity and mortality for patients with disseminated malignancy undergoing surgical intervention. METHODS The following factors were examined: age, preoperative albumin, total white blood cell count, creatinine, site of metastases, presence of ascites, presence of sepsis, steroid use, presence of dyspnea, presence of significant weight loss, preoperative chemotherapy, preoperative radiotherapy, type of operative procedure performed, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status, length of surgery, duration of inhospitalization and mortality. For univariate analysis, independent t-test and Fisher's exact test were used to analyze the association of continuous and categorical variables, respectively. For multivariate analysis, logistic regression using likelihood ratios was used. The nomogram was validated by assessing its extent of discrimination (c-index). RESULTS Twenty palliative operations for intestinal perforation were performed during this period. On univariate analysis, presence of dyspnea, decreased preoperative levels of albumin and high ECOG status were significant predictors of increased mortality. On multivariate analysis, high ECOG status and decreased preoperative albumin were statistically significant. The concordance index in our data set was 0.64. CONCLUSION Preoperative levels of albumin (>20 g/L) and low ECOG status (≤1) were independently associated with favorable postoperative outcomes. In patients with favorable prognostic factors such as absence of dyspnea, high preoperative levels of albumin and low ECOG status, surgical management should be considered. Conversely, in patients with unfavorable prognostic factors, medical management should be considered to avoid unnecessary surgery.