1. Does non‐native diversity mirror Earth's biodiversity?
- Author
-
Briski, Elizabeta, Kotronaki, Syrmalenia G., Cuthbert, Ross N., Bortolus, Alejandro, Campbell, Marnie L., Dick, Jaimie T. A., Fofonoff, Paul, Galil, Bella S., Hewitt, Chad L., Lockwood, Julie L., MacIsaac, Hugh J., Ricciardi, Anthony, Ruiz, Gregory, Schwindt, Evangelina, Sommer, Ulrich, Zhan, Aibin, Carlton, James T., Briski, Elizabeta, Kotronaki, Syrmalenia G., Cuthbert, Ross N., Bortolus, Alejandro, Campbell, Marnie L., Dick, Jaimie T. A., Fofonoff, Paul, Galil, Bella S., Hewitt, Chad L., Lockwood, Julie L., MacIsaac, Hugh J., Ricciardi, Anthony, Ruiz, Gregory, Schwindt, Evangelina, Sommer, Ulrich, Zhan, Aibin, and Carlton, James T.
- Abstract
Aim: Human activities have introduced numerous non-native species (NNS) worldwide. Understanding and predicting large-scale NNS establishment patterns remain fundamental scientific challenges. Here, we evaluate if NNS composition represents a proportional subset of the total species pool available to invade (i.e. total global biodiversity), or, conversely, certain taxa are disproportionately pre-disposed to establish in non-native areas. Location: Global. Time period: Present day. Major taxa studied: Global diversity. Methods: We compiled one of the most comprehensive global databases of NNS (36,822 established species) to determine if NNS diversity is a representative proportional subset of global biodiversity. Results: Our study revealed that, while NNS diversity mirrors global biodiversity to a certain extent, due to significant deviance from the null model it is not always a representative proportional subset of global biodiversity. The strength of global biodiversity as a predictor depended on the taxonomic scale, with successive lower taxonomic levels less predictive than the one above it. Consequently, on average, 58%, 42% and 28% of variability in NNS numbers were explained by global biodiversity for phylum, class and family respectively. Moreover, global biodiversity was a similarly strong explanatory variable for NNS diversity among regions, but not habitats (i.e. terrestrial, freshwater and marine), where it better predicted NNS diversity for terrestrial than for freshwater and marine habitats. Freshwater and marine habitats were also greatly understudied relative to invasions in the terrestrial habitats. Over-represented NNS relative to global biodiversity tended to be those intentionally introduced and/or ‘hitchhikers’ associated with deliberate introductions. Finally, randomness is likely an important factor in the establishment success of NNS. Main conclusions: Besides global biodiversity, other important explanatory variables for large-scale patterns
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF