Search

Background and Purpose: We used two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) to examine the effects of blood lipids and lipid-modifying drugs on intracranial aneurysm (IA)., Methods: Genetic variants for the effects of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), apolipoprotein A1, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), apolipoprotein B, and triglycerides and targets for lipid-modifying drugs were selected from the genome-wide discovery analyses of the UK Biobank. Summary-level data on IAs were obtained from the International Stroke Genetics Consortium. Univariate and multivariate MR analyses were performed., Results: Univariate MR analyses showed that the HDL-C was negatively correlated with IA (odds ratio [OR] = 0.816, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.715-0.932, p = 0.003) and ruptured IA (rIA; OR = 0.775, 95% CI = 0.663-0.906, p = 0.001). The multivariate MR-inverse variance weighted analysis showed that the HDL-C was negatively correlated with IA (OR = 0.655, 95% CI = 0.434-0.988, p = 0.043) and rIA (OR = 0.563, 95% CI = 0.347-0.913, p = 0.02), and the LDL-C was negatively correlated with IA (OR = 0.402, 95% CI = 0.191-0.848, p = 0.017) and rIA (OR = 0.376, 95% CI = 0.160-0.883, p = 0.025). Using genetic proxies of known lipid-modifying drugs, we found that the increased HDL-C with cholesterol ester transfer protein proxies was associated with a decreased risk of rIA (OR = 0.852, 95% CI = 0.747-0.973, p = 0.018), and the decreased LDL-C with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase proxies was associated with increased risk of IA (OR = 1.772, 95% CI = 1.080-2.908, p = 0.024) and rIA (OR = 1.856, 95% CI = 1.022-3.371, p = 0.042)., Conclusions: Genetically determined HDL-C and LDL-C reduce the risk of IA and rIA. The effects of different lipid-modifying drugs on IA need to be further investigated., (© 2022 European Academy of Neurology.)

Background: To evaluate the evidence comparing systematic mediastinal lymphadenectomy (SML) and mediastinal lymph node sampling (MLS) in the treatment of pathological stage I NSCLC using meta-analytical techniques., Methods: A literature search was undertaken until January 2014 to identify the comparative studies evaluating 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates. The pooled odds ratios (OR) and the 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI) were calculated with either the fixed or random effect models., Results: One RCT study and four retrospective studies were included in our meta-analysis. These studies included a total of 711 patients: 317 treated with SML, and 394 treated with MLS. The SML and the MLS did not demonstrate a significant difference in the 1-year survival rate. There were significant statistical differences between the 3-year (P = 0.03) and 5-year survival rates (P = 0.004), which favored SML., Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that in pathological stage I NSCLC, the MLS can get the similar outcome to the SML in terms of 1-year survival rate. However, the SML is superior to MLS in terms of 3- and 5-year survival rates.