Search

Objectives: This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To assess the effects of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination during pregnancy, versus placebo or no vaccination during pregnancy, for preventing COVID-19 disease in mothers and infants., (Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Cochrane Collaboration.)

Purpose: Real-world evidence (RWE) is increasingly used for medical regulatory decisions, yet concerns persist regarding its reproducibility and hence validity. This study addresses reproducibility challenges associated with diversity across real-world data sources (RWDS) repurposed for secondary use in pharmacoepidemiologic studies. Our aims were to identify, describe and characterize practices, recommendations and tools for collecting and reporting diversity across RWDSs, and explore how leveraging diversity could improve the quality of evidence., Methods: In a preliminary phase, keywords for a literature search and selection tool were designed using a set of documents considered to be key by the coauthors. Next, a systematic search was conducted up to December 2021. The resulting documents were screened based on titles and abstracts, then based on full texts using the selection tool. Selected documents were reviewed to extract information on topics related to collecting and reporting RWDS diversity. A content analysis of the topics identified explicit and latent themes., Results: Across the 91 selected documents, 12 topics were identified: 9 dimensions used to describe RWDS (organization accessing the data source, data originator, prompt, inclusion of population, content, data dictionary, time span, healthcare system and culture, and data quality), tools to summarize such dimensions, challenges, and opportunities arising from diversity. Thirty-six themes were identified within the dimensions. Opportunities arising from data diversity included multiple imputation and standardization., Conclusions: The dimensions identified across a large number of publications lay the foundation for formal guidance on reporting diversity of data sources to facilitate interpretation and enhance replicability and validity of RWE., (© 2024 The Authors. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: We systematically review the cross-national drug utilization studies performed in Latin America (LA) in order to analyze the methods applied and assess the validity of the data to ensure the comparability., Methods: A systematic search in Medline, Embase, and BIREME was performed. Drug utilization studies including LA countries and comparing drug exposure data on volume were included. The data validity was judged independently by two authors as having low, medium, high, or unclear risk of bias., Results: Out of 1191 articles, 25 were kept for full text reading. Finally, five studies were selected. Eight different Latin American countries were involved in the comparisons. The selected studies analyzed wholesale data from a private research company collecting information from the private healthcare sector. In three studies, a high risk of bias in the extrapolation method applied was identified. In one study, a risk of data collection bias was detected. The most frequent limitation detected by the original authors was related to the unavailability of information from the public sector in LA., Conclusion: Drug utilization studies comparing data cross-nationally are scarce in LA. In general, validity of the comparisons is hampered by a potential risk of extrapolation bias given the lack of available data on drug consumption from the public healthcare sector. Setting up systems to remediate this situation is a future challenge for researchers and (supra)national authorities in the region., (Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)