1. Three‐dimensional printing models improve long‐term retention in medical education of pathoanatomy: A randomized controlled study
- Author
-
Nour Al‐Badri, Sandrine Touzet‐Roumazeille, Alexandra Nuytten, Joël Ferri, Marie‐Laure Charkaluk, Romain Nicot, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Lille] (CHRU Lille), Médicaments et biomatériaux à libération contrôlée: mécanismes et optimisation - Advanced Drug Delivery Systems - U 1008 (MBLC - ADDS), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université de Lille-Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Lille] (CHRU Lille), Hôpital Saint Vincent de Paul de Lille, Groupement des Hôpitaux de l'Institut Catholique de Lille (GHICL), and Université catholique de Lille (UCL)-Université catholique de Lille (UCL)
- Subjects
Models, Anatomic ,education ,Students, Medical ,Histology ,Education, Medical ,[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio] ,General Medicine ,medical ,Craniosynostoses ,printing ,Imaging, Three-Dimensional ,Printing, Three-Dimensional ,three-dimensional ,Humans ,Educational Measurement ,Anatomy ,Education, Medical, Undergraduate - Abstract
International audience; Craniosynostosis is a rare and complex pathology, and visuospatial skills are necessary for a good understanding of the condition. While the use of three-dimensional (3D) models has improved the understanding of complex craniofacial anatomy, no study has evaluated the impact of this teaching support on long-term retention. Our randomized controlled trial was designed to compare the long-term retention of information with 3D-printed models of four types of craniosynostosis versus classic 3D reconstructions displayed in two-dimensional (2D) among undergraduate students. All students benefited from the same standardized course followed by the manipulation of the learning tool associated with the group for 15 min. Long-term retention was assessed by the capability to properly recognize different types of craniosynostosis 3 weeks after the course. Eighty-five students were enrolled. Previous educational achievements and baseline visuospatial skills were similar between the groups. The bivariate analysis showed the mean score in the 3D and 2D groups were 11.32 (2.89) and 8.08 (2.81), respectively (p
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF