Search

Adenovirus (HAdV) infections confer a high risk of morbidity and mortality for immunocompromised patients after stem cell transplantation (SCT). Treatment with standard antiviral drugs is of limited efficacy and associated with a high rate of adverse effects. HAdV-specific T cells are crucial for sustained viral elimination and the efficacy of adoptive T-cell therapy with donor-derived HAdV-specific T cells has been reported by several investigators. Here, we report our experience with the transfer of HAdV-specific T cells specific for penton, which was recently identified as an immunodominant target of T cells, and hexon in a 14-year-old boy after T-cell-depleted haploidentical SCT for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). He developed severe HAdV-associated enteritis complicated by acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). The patient received ten infusions of allogeneic HAdV-specific T cells manufactured from the haploidentical stem cell donor using the CliniMacs Interferon-γ (IFN-γ) cytokine capture and immunomagnetic selection. Initially, T cells were generated against the immunodominant target hexon and in subsequent transfers dual antigen-specific T cells against hexon and penton were applied. T-cell transfers were scheduled individually tailored to current immunosuppressive treatment. Each transfer was followed by reduction of HAdV load in peripheral blood and clinical improvement. Importantly, T-cell responses to both penton and hexon pools emerged in patient blood after repetitive transfers. Unfortunately, the patient experienced bacterial sepsis, and in this context, severe GvHD requiring intensive immunosuppression followed by secondary progression of HAdV infection. The patient succumbed to multiorgan failure 283 days after SCT. This case demonstrates the feasibility of HAdV-specific T-cell transfer even in the presence of immunosuppressive treatment. Targeting of multiple immunodominant viral proteins may prove valuable in patients with complicated HAdV infections.

Background Donors with short interdonation intervals (e.g., apheresis donors) have an increased risk of window period donations. The frequency of cytomegalovirus (CMV) window period donations is important information to decide whether selection of seronegative donors might be advantageous for patients at risk for transfusion-transmitted CMV infections (TT-CMV). Study Design and Methods CMV seroconversion in 93 donors with positive results in routine CMV antibody testing within at most 35 days after the last seronegative sample was evaluated by Western blot and/or a second antibody test. In donors with unconfirmed seroconversion, an additional later sample was tested. Concentration of CMV DNA was determined in pre- and postseroconversion samples. Results CMV seroconversion was confirmed in 12 donors (13%). Among these, the last seronegative sample was CMV DNA positive in three donors (25%, below 30 IU/mL). The first seropositive sample was CMV DNA positive in 10 donors (83%, maximum 1600 IU/mL). Both prevalence and median concentration of CMV DNA were higher in the first seropositive sample (p = 0.004 and p = 0.02), with maximum concentrations being reached about 2 weeks after seroconversion. No CMV DNA was detected in samples from donors with unconfirmed seroconversion. Conclusion At least in donors with short interdonation intervals, most suspected CMV seroconversions are due to false-positive results of the screening test. As window period donations are rare and contain less CMV DNA than the first seropositive donation, avoidance of blood products from primarily seropositive donors is especially helpful to avoid TT-CMV if donors with short interdonation intervals are concerned.

BACKGROUND: The objective was to investigate potential risks for apheresis donors associated with a triple-plateletpheresis (TP) program. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Eleven hemapheresis centers randomly assigned 411 repeat donors (ratio, 1:1.2) to either double plateletpheresis (DP; 185 donors) or TP (226 donors) with a platelet (PLT) target content of at least 5.0 × 1011 PLTs/DP and at least 7.5 × 1011 PLTs/TP. The primary endpoint was procedure-related postapheresis PLT count of at least 150 × 109/L (probability, ≥98%). Secondary endpoints were apheresis characteristics and donor adverse reactions. RESULTS: In 6 of 1133 DPs (0.5%) in 4 of 185 donors (2.2%) and in 20 of 1020 TPs (2.0%) in 14 of 226 donors (6.2%), postapheresis PLT counts were below 150 × 109/L. There were marginal but significant differences in collection efficiency (DP, 69.2 ± 9.1%; TP, 70.9 ± 9.0%; p ≤ 0.0001) and collection rate (DP, 10.4 × 109 ± 2.3 × 109 PLTs/min; TP, 10.8 × 109 ± 2.3 × 109 PLTs/min; p ≤ 0.005). The PLT yields were 5.9 × 1011 ± 0.8 × 1011 PLTs for DP and 8.3 × 1011 ± 0.9 × 1011 PLT for TP (p ≤ 0.0001) at processing times of 59 ± 13 minutes (DP) versus 80 ± 16 minutes (TP; p ≤ 0.0001). Significant PLT recruitment (1.10 ± 0.14 vs. 1.20 ± 0.23; p

BACKGROUND: Delayed donor red blood cell chimerism (DRCC), pure red blood cell aplasia (PRCA), and autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) are poorly documented complications after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The clinical variable “prolonged isolated red blood cell transfusion requirement” (PRTR) was evaluated as a trigger for an extended diagnostic workup. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: PRTR was defined as the need for red blood cell (RBC) transfusions beyond Day 60 after HCT. We analyzed 487 patients transplanted between 2000 and 2006. Median age was 37 years (range, 0-70 years). Peripheral blood stem cells (n = 344), marrow (n = 138), and cord blood (n = 5) from 278 unrelated and 209 family donors were used. RESULTS: Univariate analysis identified age (incidence of 18.3% among elderly patients, 10.5% in adults, and 2.0% among children [p = 0.002]), ABO incompatibility (16.4% after major incompatible, 2.9% after minor incompatible, and 9.4% after ABO-compatible transplantations [p = 0.003]), conditioning (15.2% after reduced-intensity regimens vs. 7.3% after myeloablative conditioning; p = 0.006), donor type (13.2% after HLA-matched unrelated, 13.6% after mismatched unrelated, 5.7% after matched related, and 0.0% after mismatched related grafts; p = 0.026), and acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD; 7.1% with aGVHD vs. 12.5% without aGVHD; p = 0.046) as predisposing factors. In multivariate analysis minor ABO incompatibility (odds ratio [OR] = 0.2, p = 0.01), younger age (OR = 0.1, p = 0.02), and matched related HCT (OR = 0.4, p = 0.02) remained independent protective factors. CONCLUSIONS: PRTR could serve as a trigger for a standardized screening for DRCC, PRCA, and AIHA after HCT.

Background: Antigen-specific immunoadsorption combined with rituximab offers the possibility for ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation without splenectomy. Patient and method: An 8-year-old mentally retarded girl with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis due to mitochondriopathy poorly tolerated hemodialysis. Paternal blood group A1B was incompatible with blood group B of the child. Therefore, we decided to perform the first ABO-incompatible renal transplantation in a child in Germany using antigen-specific immunoadsorption. Rituximab (1 × 375 mg/m2) was administered 2 weeks before the first immunoadsorption (Glycosorb® ABO A-column). Triple-drug immunosuppression (tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone) was simultaneously started with immunoadsorption. Initial tacrolimus levels were targeted between 15 and 20 ng/ml. Before transplantation, six immunoadsorptions were applied on days −9, −7, −4, −3, −2 and −1. Intravenous immunoglobulin (0.5 g/kg) was administered preoperatively. After transplantation, three immunoadsorptions were performed on days +4, +6 and +8. Results: Before transplantation, antibody (Ab) titers against paternal erythrocytes (20°C) were reduced from 1 : 64 to 1 : 4 by six antigen-specific immunoadsorptions. After transplantation, we performed three more immunoadsorptions and the Ab titers were stable between 1 : 1 and 1 : 8. One, 2 and 8 months later we observed increases in the Ab titer up to 1 : 32 requiring no change in immunosuppressive therapy. No side effects of immunoadsorption were observed. The girl had excellent initial graft function with a serum creatinine of 55 to 70 μmol/l. Two weeks after transplantation, graft biopsy showed no signs of rejection; there was focal positivity for C4d only. Twelve months after transplantation, renal function was stable, with a serum creatinine of 117 μmol/l. Episodes of rejection or severe infections were absent. Conclusion: ABO-incompatible transplantation using antigen-specific immunoadsorption and rituximab may serve as a suitable alternative for children urgently needing renal transplantation and missing a blood group-compatible donor.

Background and Objectives The aim of this study was to analyse the platelet function, over a 5-day time-period, of apheresis-derived platelet concentrates obtained from smokers and non-smokers. Materials and Methods Smoker and non-smoker plateletpheresis products were investigated on days 1, 3 and 5 of storage. Receptor expression (as evaluated by flow cytometry) and the platelet aggregation response were measured. Results There was only a slight loss of platelet function in apheresis products from smokers compared to non-smokers. Conclusions Smoking does not significantly change the quality of platelet preparations. The current practice, of not to exclude smokers from platelet donation, can be continued.

BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to establish a mobilization and apheresis regimen for collection of two consecutive polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN) concentrates from the same donor. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS In this prospective study, 111 healthy unrelated volunteers underwent either one (Group 1, n = 57) or two consecutive granulocyte apheresis procedure (Group 2, n = 54) using the a cell separator (Spectra). Both Group 1 and 2 donors were initially mobilized with glycosylated G-CSF 6.0 micro g per kg (range, 5.2-7.0 micro g/kg) subcutaneously plus oral dexa-methasone (DXM, 8 mg) and underwent granulocyte apheresis (GA-1) 16 hours (range, 13-18 hr) after initial G-CSF+DXM. Group 2 donors were remobilized with a second DXM dose of 8 mg (n = 13), 4 mg (n = 15), 1.5 mg (n = 13), or none (n = 13), and a second apheresis (GA-2) was run 40 hours (range, 37-42 hr) after G-CSF+DXM administration and 12 hours after remobilization with DXM alone. RESULTS Based on equivalent median preapheresis WBC and PMN counts of around 35 x 10(9) WBCs per L and 33 x 10(9) PMNs per L after initial mobilization the GA-1 yields were 85 x 10(9) PMNs per U (range, 34-150) in Group 1 and 75 x 10(9) PMNs per U (range, 35-135) in Group 2 (p = 0.14, NS). In Group 2, median preapheresis values of 19.6 x 10(9) WBCs per L (range, 9.5-37.0) and 16.6 x 10(9) PMNs per L (range, 8.8-34.8) were measured after remobilization and GA-2 yields of 49 x 10(9) WBCs per U (range, 26-113) and 42 x 10(9) PMNs per U (range, 21-95) were obtained. Borderline statistical differences in the GA-2 yields were observed from the remobilized donors: 8 mg: 36 x 10(9) PMNs per U (range, 23-60); 4 mg: 47 x 10(9) PMNs per U (range, 21-56) (p

BACKGROUND: A new cell separator (COM.TEC, Fresenius) was recently developed aimed at efficient collection of WBC-reduced single-donor PLT concentrates (SDPs). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Five German centers collected 554 WBC-reduced SDPs with help of the COM.TEC cell separator. Two multicenter cell counting studies were performed at the beginning and at the end of the study to document uniform counting results among the participating centers. RESULTS: A total of 441 (79.6%) PLT collections were included in the study according to the protocol. A total of 342 single-dose and 99 double-dose SDPs were collected. For single-dose SDPs, an average blood volume of 2826 ± 409 mL was processed in a donation time of 55 ± 11 minutes. Mean PLT yield of these products was 3.11 × 1011± 0.40 × 1011 and the WBC contamination was 0.11 × 106± 0.20 × 106. For double-dose SDPs (PLT count, 5.29 ± 0.93 × 1011), 3943 ± 639 mL was processed. The average difference between the target and the collected PLT concentration was −2.8 ± 12.0 percent for single-dose SDPs and −1.8 ± 9.5 for double-dose SDPs, respectively. The collection efficiency was 53.7 ± 5.8 percent for single-dose SDPs and 58.2 ± 6.2 percent for double-dose SDPs. If all results of each sample from the counting study were set to unity (to the mean over all centers), most PLT determinations were very similar to the mean, for example, near or 1 if set to unity. CONCLUSION: The COM.TEC machine makes it possible to obtain WBC-reduced SDPs that comply with current standards.

A novel DNA virus (TTV) was identified recently in Japanese patients with posttransfusion hepatitis non-A-E and has been implicated as a cause of acute and chronic liver diseases of unknown etiology in some patients. The frequency of TTV infections was investigated in 284 blood donors, 105 patients with different liver disorders before and after liver transplantation (OLT), as well as in 64 patients with chronic hepatitis C who received antiviral therapy. TTV infections were found more frequently by nested-PCR in patients with liver disorders (15%) as compared to blood donors (7%). TTV occurred independently of the aetiology of the liver disease (e.g., cryptogenic cirrhosis [12.5%], alcoholic cirrhosis [16%], fulminant hepatic failure non-A-E [35%], and chronic hepatitis C [12.5%]; p=n.s.). After OLT, a high rate of TTV de novo infections (44%) was observed. However, TTV viremia after OLT (in 56 out of the 105 patients) was not associated with graft hepatitis. Analysis of patients with chronic hepatitis C coinfected with TTV who have been treated with interferon alpha alone or in combination with ribavirin revealed that TTV is an interferon-sensitive virus. Phylogenetic analysis of TTV sequences suggest that at least four different genotypes and several subtypes exist in Germany. In conclusion, the high prevalence of TTV infections observed in patients with parenteral risk factors is an argument in favour of transmission of the virus via blood and blood products. A relevant hepatitis-inducing capacity of TTV, however, seems unlikely, considering the observation that in the majority of patients, TTV infection after OLT was not accompanied by graft hepatitis.

We evaluated the AS104 cell separator (Fresenius AG, Bad Homburg, Germany) for ex vivo processing of bone marrow (BM) grafts of 43 patients suffering from germ cell cancer (GCC, n = 22), acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL, n = 13) and malignant lymphoma (ML, n = 8). Recoveries of total nucleated cells (TNC), mononuclear cells (MNC) and colony-forming units granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) were determined in the BM concentrates prepared for cryopreservation. Hematopoietic reconstitution was analyzed in patients who underwent autologous transplantation following high-dose radio-/chemotherapy (HDRCT). Processing of the BM suspension with a median volume of 1,013 ml (range: 422-1,574) resulted in 156 ml (80-186) within 50-120 min (median: 90). In the BM concentrates, medians of 28.6% TNC (10.6-69.6), 37.9% MNC (22.3-86.4), and 52.4% CFU-GM (20.8-96.4) were recovered. Twenty-six patients underwent HDRCT with reinfusion of autologous BM and were evaluable for engraftment. They received a median of 0.8 x 10 8 MNC/kg (0.3-1.6 x 10 8 ) and 2.2 x 10 4 CFU-GM/kg (0.6-12.8 x 10 4 ) for hematopoietic rescue. Engraftment with neutrophils >500/μl occurred in a median time of 12 days (8-33) in all patients. We conclude that ex vivo processing of autologous BM with median recovery rates of 37.9% for MNC, and 52.4% for CFU-GM, results in a cell population that can rescue patients from HDRCT. The described technique is convenient, time-efficient, and provides reliable results in preparing BM autografts for cryopreservation.

During ex vivo processing of autologous bone marrow (BM) substantial loss of stem and progenitor cells should be avoided to achieve rapid and sustained hematopoietic reconstitution after high-dose radio-/chemotherapy. We processed 25 autologous BM grafts with the Fresenius AS104 cell separator for cryopreservation and we determined recoveries for mononuclear cells (MNC) and colonyforming units granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) in the BM concentrates. To identify cell loss in BM fractions not cryopreserved, we investigated the MNC and CFU-GM content of BM fat and BM blood. MNC and CFU-GM recovery yielded a mean ( +/- SEM) of 42 +/- 12 and 54 +/- 20% in the BM concentrate. BM fat showed a mean loss of 7 +/- 5% for MNC and 4 +/- 3% for CFU-GM, BM blood 30 +/- 12% for MNC and 13 +/- 13% for CFU-GM, respectively. CFU-GM recovery was significantly higher in the BM concentrate of patients with hematologic malignancy (HM) compared with patients suffering from germ cell cancer (GCC): 66 +/- 21 vs. 43 +/- 12% (p0.02). Seventeen patients (7 GCC, 10 HM) underwent high-dose chemotherapy or radio-/chemotherapy and were autografted with 0.8 +/- 0.2 x 10(8) MNC/kg and 3.7 +/- 2.0 x 10(4) CFU-GM/kg. All patients achieved engraftment with neutrophils0.5 x 10(9)/l at a mean of 14 +/- 6 days. We conclude that: (1) ex vivo processing of autologous BM with a mean of recovery of 42% for MNC and 54% for CFU-GM in the BM concentrate can result in a cell population capable of sustained hematopoietic reconstitution, (2) CFU-GM recovery is significantly higher in patients with HM than in patients with GCC and (3) 37% MNC and 17% CFU-GM represent in fact cell losses recovered from BM fractions not cryopreserved (BM fat, BM blood). Furthermore, it is likely that MNC and CFU-GM not recovered from BM concentrate, BM fat and BM blood are cell losses related to the cell separator.

BACKGROUND: Photodynamic virus inactivation of fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) may result in its impaired coagulation capability. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Double-volume plasmapheresis samples from 11 donors were divided in pairs of 250 mL. One group underwent methylene blue (MB) phototreatment (MB-FFP). The other group was treated according to the standards of the American Association of Blood Banks for preparation and storage of FFP. Parameters of hemostasis and clinically important plasma proteins were tested in native plasma, thawed MB-FFP, thawed FFP, and twice-frozen and thawed FFP (FFP-II). RESULTS: Mean activities of factor V (73.4 vs. 94.5%; p < 0.01), factor VIII (58.1 vs. 86.7%; p < 0.001), and fibrinogen (1.8 vs. 2.8 g/L; p < 0.001) were reduced in MB-FFP as compared to those in FFP. The comparison of MB-FFP to FFP-II revealed reduced activities of factor VIII (58.1 vs. 85.2%; p < 0.001) and fibrinogen (1.8 vs. 2.8 g/L; p < 0.001) but no changes in factor V. Activated partial thromboplastin time in MB-FFP was prolonged beyond the upper normal range (+5.3 sec; p < 0.001) and prothrombin time increased in MB-FFP versus FFP (+0.96 sec; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: MB phototreatment reduces the in vitro coagulation capacity of FFP, most likely as a result of the effects of an additional freezing and thawing procedure and photooxidation-induced protein damage.

Background and objectives Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) are increasingly used for autologous transplantation after high-dose radio/chemotherapy in patients suffering from cancer. PBPC are usually collected after mobilization with conventional-dose chemotherapy plus growth factor. However, it is conceivable to perform leukapheresis for the second autograft during recovery of hematopoiesis after the first course of HDCT/ABPCT. Materials and methods We treated two patients this way. In the first, with germ cell cancer, six 12-liter leukaphereses yielded 1.8 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg after mobilization with cis-platinum, etoposide and ifosfamide (PEI) plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). The second patient, with relapsed Hodgkin's disease, underwent PBPC collection after treatment with dexamethasone, carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan (DexaBEAM) plus G-CSF. Due to excellent mobilization, 8.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg were collected by one 12-liter leukapheresis. Both patients then underwent PBPC collection during hematopoietic recovery following HDCT and ABPCT. Results In patient 1, following HDCT and ABPCT, three 12-liter aphereses resulted in 0.7 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. In patient 2, also after HDCT and ABPCT, a second autograft with 3.2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg was harvested by a single 10-liter apheresis. No adverse effects were seen in either patient during apheresis following ABPCT. To our knowledge this is the first report dealing with PBCT collection during hematopoietic recovery following HDCT and ABPCT. Conclusions (1) PBPC harvesting is feasible and well tolerated in this setting. (2) In appropriate patients with efficient PBPC mobilization after conventional-dose chemotherapy, a further PBPC autograft can be collected during recovery of hematopoiesis after ABPCT, serving as a rescue for a second course of HDCT.

Dear Editor, Recently, Schrezenmeier and Seifried [1] presented a review on the question whether pooled buffy-coat-derived platelet concentrates (PPCs) or apheresis PCs (APCs) should be preferred. They claimed that PPCs and APCs have comparable content of platelets (PLTs), purity, safety, and efficacy. They argued that almost all APCs could be replaced by PPCs and that PLT apheresis donations should be restricted to PLT recipients with anti-HLA and ⁄ or anti-HPA antibodies from the donor¢s perspective to drop the apheresis procedure-related donor risks to a ‘zero’ value and to optimize the use of the whole blood (WB) donation. Some weeks ago, Vamvakas [2] gave a systematic review of disparate risks of PPCs vs. APCs. He calculated an annual increase of 1AE2 (best case) to 3AE5 (worst case) additional cases for HIV, 1AE3 to 3AE9 for HCV, and 9AE0 to 27AE1 for HBV transmission, if PPCs would completely replace APCs. For a novel ‘HIV like’ infectious agent with a prevalence of 1:10 000 donations (for comparison, the incidence of HIV in the last year before testing was ten times higher), he predicted 252AE6 to 757AE7 additional transmissions. From our group, a recent risk calculation was performed by Heuft et al. [3], Hannover Medical School. They found that an unrecognized infection with a prevalence of 1% in the donor population would result in three to four times higher infection rates for PPC recipients compared to pure APC supply. Both Vamvakas and Heuft considered shorter donation intervals, the influence of splitting apheresis donations and low numbers WB donations per PPC for their calculations. Schrezenmeier and Seifried [1] cited both studies but voted to ignore their results because ‘so far, no epidemiological study or clinical trial have demonstrated different risk of viral infections transmitted by pooled PCs compared to apheresis PCs.’ This argumentation is on absolutely no account acceptable. Of course, the effects of a novel HIV-like virus cannot be proven epidemiologically or clinically before it has emerged. However, over the past decades, many previously unknown infectious agents have emerged. Recent work on the genetic distance of the two oldest currently known specimens of HIV-1 demonstrated that the first infections of humans by HIV-1 have occurred more than 100 years ago, at least two decades earlier than previously believed [4]. This clearly demonstrates that a dangerous infectious agent, which can be transmitted via transfusion and which kills recipients some years or even decades after transmission, may spread over many decades until becoming uncovered. The only way to meet this typical risk of blood transfusion is to strictly limit the donor exposure for the transfusion recipient and to replace a pooled component by a nonpooled alternative whenever possible. On the strength of past experience with the transmission of HIV and hepatitis viruses by blood and blood products, the consideration of very small and even of fictitious and yet unproven risks is common practice as well in transfusion medicine as in the legislation and the jurisdiction in all developed countries. In addition, we want to point out another relevant, but currently neglected issue: the production of PPCs has negative effects on the overall quality of the red cell supply. WB for PPC production is often held overnight at room temperature. However, at this temperature, red cells lose 2,3diphosphoglycerate (2,3-DPG) extremely rapidly [5]. Red cell concentrates (RCCs) from WB leukoreduced by a PLTsaving filter and stored overnight at room temperature contain remarkable levels of PLT-derived cytokines [6]. Finally, if PCs are produced by the BC method, a relevant proportion of red cells, at least ten per cent, is removed from the WB. This may result in a remarkable proportion of underfilled RCCs [7]. In summary, the production of PPCs impairs the quality of the red cell supply by red cell loss, by the rapid loss of 2,3-DPG, and by the accumulation of PLT-derived cytokines. Therefore, we strongly argue for an integral view on the blood supply that notes and considers the negative effects of PPC production from WB on the red cell supply. In conclusion, we fully agree with Vamvakas and disagree with Schrezenmeier and Seifried. Not APCs should be replaced by PPCs, but PPCs should be replaced by APCs. The most important factor determining the PLT product choice must be the difference of the risk of transfusiontransmitted infections, particularly of the transmission of a new HIV-like agent. In addition, there is sufficient evidence Vox Sanguinis (2010)

In a 73-year-old female with chronic lymphocytic leukemia we observed an acute illness with shivering, high fever, and hemolytic anemia following chlorambucil administration. Reexposure in a controlled clinical situation suggested an allergic drug reaction. In an in vitro assay, we were able to demonstrate chlorambucil as the causative agent of immune hemolysis.