Search

Detection of the t(15;17) or its molecular consequence, the PML-RAR alpha rearrangement, is critical for meaningful analysis of clinical trials involving patients with suspected acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL). Its presence remains the best predictor of a favourable response to retinoids, such as ATRA, which in combination with chemotherapy confer significant improvements in disease-free survival. We have evaluated the relative efficacy of RT-PCR, cytogenetics and PML immunofluorescence staining to identify the existence of the translocation in 100 patients entered into the Medical Research Council (M.R.C.) ATRA trial. RT-PCR successfully identified PML-RAR alpha rearrangements in 93/100 patients, including 65 where only peripheral blood or post-induction marrow samples were available for analysis and in 12 patients in whom cytogenetic assessment failed to demonstrate t(15;17) due to poor-quality metaphases (10/12) or as a reflection of cryptic PML-RAR alpha rearrangements (2/12). Parallel employment of the RAR alpha-PML assay confirmed expression of del(17q)-derived transcripts in 81% and permitted determination of the PML breakpoint (a potential independent prognostic variable) in all 93 cases. Sequencing of RT-PCR products derived from 50 patients with 3' PML breakpoints revealed five bcr 2 cases, including a novel exon 5 breakpoint. 35/81 (43%) patients with cytogenetic evidence of t(15;17) possessed additional karyotypic abnormalities. In four patients with available buffy coat smears, lack of cytogenetic or molecular evidence of the t(15;17) was confirmed by a wild-type PML immunofluorescence nuclear staining pattern, in contrast to the characteristic microparticulate distribution detected in 14 patients with RT-PCR evidence of the rearrangement. However, although PML immunofluorescence staining is suitable for rapid determination of patients likely to benefit from ATRA, this approach does not obviate the need for cytogenetic and RT-PCR analysis of all patients entered into APL clinical trials, because both techniques provide additional information which may prove to be of independent prognostic significance.