Search

Abstract Background Lazertinib is an oral, third‐generation EGFR‐TKI, which specifically targets the EGFR T790M mutation along with activating mutations Ex19del and L858R. More real‐world data are needed to evaluate its efficacy and safety in treating locally advanced and metastatic non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following prior EGFR TKI treatment. Methods This multicenter retrospective study was conducted at seven university hospitals affiliated to the Catholic Medical Center (CMC) in Korea. A clinical data warehouse (CDW) platform was used to access and extract information. Results A total of 48 patients were assessed. The majority were female (75%) and diagnosed with adenocarcinoma (95.8%). All patients had the EGFR mutation at diagnosis, 27 (56.3%) had the exon 19 deletion, 20 (41.7%) had the L858R mutation, and one (2.0%) had the exon 18 mutation. The median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 15.4 months. At 6, 12, and 18 months, PFS rates were 79.1%, 53.6%, and 27.3%, respectively. When PFS was analyzed by prior TKI duration (18 months), significant differences were noted at the 6 and 9‐month mark (p = 0.013 and p = 0.010, respectively). In multivariate analysis for PFS, only prior TKI duration and ECOG score showed statistical significance (p = 0.026 and p = 0.049, respectively). In the multivariate analysis for OS, ECOG score showed statistical significance (p = 0.006). Among 48 patients, 34 (70.8%) experienced adverse events (AEs) related to lazertinib. The most frequent AEs were skin reaction (29.8%), diarrhea (21.3%), and peripheral neuropathy (20.8%). Conclusions The results suggest that lazertinib is effective in second or more line settings, with tolerable safety profile. More patient data are necessary to find possible prognostic markers associated with patient outcome.

Abstract Background Patients with locally advanced, unresectable, non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving definitive concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) benefit from durvalumab consolidation therapy. However, predictive factors for early relapse during durvalumab maintenance have not yet been identified. Methods The present study included the lung cancer cohort of the Catholic Medical Centers at the Catholic University of Korea from January 2018 to December 2021. A total of 51 NSCLC patients treated with durvalumab consolidation therapy after definitive CCRT were included in the analysis. Early relapse was defined as patients experiencing relapse within 6 months of starting initial durvalumab therapy. Results Among the 51 patients, 15 (29.4%) relapsed during the study period. Median time from initial therapy of durvalumab to progression was 451.00 ± 220.87 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 18.10–883.90) in overall patients. In multivariate analysis, younger age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.792; 95% CI: 0.642–0.977; p = 0.030), higher pack‐years (aOR, 1.315; 95% CI: 1.058–1.635; p = 0.014), non‐COPD (aOR, 0.004; 95% CI: 0.000–0.828; p = 0.004) and anemia (aOR, 234.30; 95% CI: 1.212–45280.24; p = 0.042), were independent predictive factors for early relapse during durvalumab consolidation therapy. Conclusion Younger age, higher number of pack‐years, non‐COPD, and anemia were independent predictive factors for early relapse during durvalumab consolidation therapy in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC after definitive CCRT. Careful patient selection and clinical attention are needed for high‐risk individuals.

Abstract Background The phase III trial IMpower133 showed that platinum and etoposide plus atezolizumab was associated with improved overall survival (OS) and progression free‐survival (PFS) when compared to the placebo group in treatment‐naïve extensive stage (ES) small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Due to superiority in clinical outcomes, combination immunotherapy plus chemotherapy have become mainstay treatment modalities as first‐line treatment in ES‐SCLC. Nevertheless, real‐world data are still lacking and the search for potential biomarkers is essential. This study aimed to evaluate potential predictive biomarkers applicable in ES‐SCLC under combination therapy. Methods Patients with ES‐SCLC under etoposide‐platinum‐atezolizumab enrolled from seven university hospitals affiliated to the Catholic University of Korea were evaluated. Pretreatment clinical parameters were evaluated for association with OS and PFS. Adverse events (AEs) during induction and maintenance phases were also evaluated. p‐values below 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results A total of 41 patients were evaluated. Six‐month survival was 68.6%. As best response to treatment, 26 (63.4%) showed partial response, nine (22.0%) showed stable disease, and four (9.8%) showed progressive disease. During the induction phase, grade I–II AEs occurred in 22 (53.7%) patients, and grade III–IV AEs occurred in 26 (63.4%) patients. During the maintenance phase, nine out of 25 (36.0%) patients experienced any grade AEs. In multivariate analysis for OS, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), c‐reactive protein (CRP), and forced vital capacity (%) were significant factors. In multivariate analysis for PFS, sex, and LDH were significant. Conclusion In ES‐SCLC under etoposide‐platinum‐atezolizumab, pretreatment CRP, LDH and FVC (%) were independent predictive factors.

Abstract Background Local treatment (LT) such as radiotherapy and metastasectomy on metastatic sites may improve outcomes in oligometastatic NSCLC patients, but more data are necessary to support LT in oligometastatic diseases. Patients with single extrathoracic metastatic lesion are more likely to benefit from local therapy. In this study, we evaluated the impact of LT in NSCLC patients with a single extrathoracic metastatic lesion. Methods Data were obtained from the Korean Association for Lung Cancer Registry (KALC‐R), a database created using a retrospective sampling survey by the Korean Central Cancer Registry (KCCR) and the Lung Cancer Registration Committee. Results A total of 787 NSCLC patients with a single extrathoracic metastatic lesion were evaluated. In the multivariate analysis for OS, age, female sex, poor performance score, squamous histological subtype, LT, and initial treatment modality showed significant associations. Regarding LT, groups that underwent curative LT were significantly associated with better OS compared to groups that did not undergo LT (p = 0.011, HR 0.448, 95% CI: 0.242–0.829). In the multivariate analysis of patients who underwent LT, poor performance score, initial treatment modality, and T stage were independently associated with poor OS. Compared to the T1 stage, T3 stage showed an HR of 2.470 (95% CI: 1.309–4.663; p = 0.005) and T4 stage showed an HR of 2.063 (95% CI: 1.093–3.904; p = 0.026). Conclusion In NSCLC with a single extrathoracic metastatic lesion, LT, especially for curative purposes, has an independent association with OS. Moreover, among the patients who received LT, factors such as T stage, poor performance score, and initial treatment modality were significantly associated with OS.