1. What, how, and how much do herbivores eat? The Continuous Bite Monitoring method for assessing forage intake of grazing animals
- Author
-
Anibal de Moraes, Marcelo Wallau, Leonardo Silvestri Szymczak, Alda Lúcia Gomes Monteiro, Renata Franciéli Moraes, Anderson Michel Soares Bolzan, Paulo César de Faccio Carvalho, Olivier Jean François Bonnet, and L. B. Nadin
- Subjects
Herbivore ,Ecology ,Intake rate ,short‐term intake rate ,Foraging ,grasslands ,Direct observation ,Forage ,tall fescue ,Biology ,foraging ,Animal science ,herbage intake ,grazing ecology ,Grazing ,Animal behavior ,Monitoring methods ,Italian ryegrass ,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics ,QH540-549.5 ,Original Research ,Nature and Landscape Conservation - Abstract
Determining herbage intake is pivotal for studies on grazing ecology. Direct observation of animals allows describing the interactions of animals with the pastoral environment along the complex grazing process. The objectives of the study were to evaluate the reliability of the continuous bite monitoring (CBM) method in determining herbage intake in grazing sheep compared to the standard double‐weighing technique method during 45‐min feeding bouts; evaluate the degree of agreement between the two techniques; and to test the effect of different potential sources of variation on the reliability of the CBM. The CBM method has been used to describe the intake behavior of grazing herbivores. In this study, we evaluated a new approach to this method, that is, whether it is a good proxy for determining the intake of grazing animals. Three experiments with grazing sheep were carried out in which we tested for different sources of variations, such as the number of observers, level of detail of bite coding grid, forage species, forage allowance, sward surface height heterogeneity, experiment site, and animal weight, to determine the short‐term intake rate (45 min). Observer (Pexp1 = 0.018, Pexp2 = 0.078, and Pexp3 = 0.006), sward surface height (Pexp2, We showed an agreement between the Continuous bite Monitoring method and Double‐Weighing Technique method; Continuous Bite Monitoring method is a good proxy for determining the intake of grazing animals; Direct observation is not invasive nor disrupts natural animal behavior.
- Published
- 2021