1. Drug‐Coated Balloon Versus Plain Balloon Angioplasty for Hemodialysis Dysfunction: A Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
- Author
-
Chenyu Liu, Matthew Wolfers, Bint‐e Zainab Awan, Issa Ali, Adrian Michael Lorenzana, Quinn Smith, George Tadros, and Qian Yu
- Subjects
arteriovenous fistula ,arteriovenous graft ,balloon angioplasty ,drug‐coated balloon angioplasty ,hemodialysis dysfunction ,meta‐analysis ,Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system ,RC666-701 - Abstract
Background Both drug‐coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty and conventional plain balloon angioplasty (PBA) can be implemented to treat hemodialysis dysfunction. The present study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of these 2 approaches by conducting a meta‐analysis of available randomized controlled trials. Methods and Results PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were queried from establishment to January 2021. A total of 18 randomized controlled trials including 877 and 875 patients in the DCB and PBA groups, respectively, were included in the present meta‐analysis. Target lesion primary patency, circuit patency, target lesion revascularization, and mortality were pooled. Odds ratios (ORs) were reported with 95% CIs. Publication bias was analyzed with funnel plot and Egger test. Target lesion primary patency was higher among patients who underwent DCB (OR, 2.93 [95% CI, 2.13–4.03], P
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF