Search

Background: Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging is well validated for the diagnosis and quantification of myocardial infarction (MI). 2D LGE imaging involves multiple breath‐holds for acquisition of short‐axis slices to cover the left ventricle (LV). 3D LGE methods cover the LV in a single breath‐hold; however, breath‐hold duration is typically long with images susceptible to motion artifacts. Purpose/Hypothesis: To assess a single breath‐hold 3D mDIXON LGE pulse sequence for image quality and quantitation of MI. Study Type: Prospective. Population: Ninety‐ two patients with prior MI. Field Strength/Sequence: 1.5T cardiac MRI protocol using both conventional 2D phase sensitive inversion recovery and 3D mDIXON LGE imaging 10 minutes following contrast administration in random order to avoid bias. Assessment: Data were analyzed qualitatively for image quality (three observers). Quantitative assessment of myocardial scar mass (full‐width half‐maximum), scar transmurality, and contrast‐to‐noise ratio measurements were performed. Time for 2D and 3D LGE imaging was recorded. Statistical Tests: Paired Student's t‐test, Wilcoxon rank test, Cohen κ statistic, Pearson correlation, linear regression, and Bland–Altman analysis. Results: Image quality scores were comparable between 3D and 2D LGE (1.4 ± 0.6 vs. 1.3 ± 0.5; P = 0.162). 3D LGE was associated with greater scar tissue mass (3D: 18.9 ± 17.5 g vs. 2D: 17.8 ± 16.2 g P = 0.03), although this difference was less pronounced when scar tissue was expressed as %LV mass (3D: 13.4 ± 9.9% vs. 2D: 12.7 ± 9.5% P = 0.07). For 3D vs. 2D scar mass there was a strong and significant positive correlation; Bland–Altman analysis showed mean mass bias of 1.1 g (95% confidence interval [CI]: –5.7 to 7.9). Segmental level agreement of scar transmurality between 3D and 2D LGE at the clinical viability threshold of 50% transmurality was excellent (κ = 0.870). 3D image acquisition (15.6 ± 1.4 sec) was just 5% of time required for 2D images (311.6 ± 43.2 sec) P < 0.0001. Data Conclusion: Single breath‐hold 3D mDIXON LGE imaging allows quantitative assessment of MI mass and transmurality, with comparable image quality, in vastly shorter overall acquisition time compared with standard 2D LGE imaging. Level of Evidence: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2

BACKGROUND: Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging was validated for diagnosis and quantification of myocardial infarction (MI). Despite good contrast between scar and normal myocardium, contrast between blood pool and myocardial scar can be limited. Dark blood LGE sequences attempt to overcome this issue. PURPOSE: To evaluate T1 rho (T1 ρ)-prepared dark blood sequence and compare to blood nulled (BN) phase sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) and standard myocardium nulled (MN) PSIR for detection and quantification of scar. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: Thirty patients with prior MI. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: Patients underwent identical 1.5 T MRI protocols. Following routine LGE imaging, a slice with scar, remote myocardium, and blood pool was selected. PSIR LGE was repeated with inversion time set to MN, to BN, and T1 ρ FIDDLE (flow-independent dark-blood delayed enhancement) in random order. ASSESSMENT: Three observers. Qualitative assessment of confidence scores in scar detection and degree of transmurality. Quantitative assessment of myocardial scar mass (grams), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) measurements between scar, blood pool, and myocardium. STATISTICAL TESTS: Repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni correction, coefficient of variation, and the Cohen κ statistic. RESULTS: CNRscar-blood was significantly increased for both BN (27.1 ± 10.4) and T1 ρ (30.2 ± 15.1) compared with MN (15.3 ± 8.4 P < 0.001 for both sequences). There was no significant difference in CNRscar-myo between BN (55.9 ± 17.3) and MN (51.1 ± 17.8 P = 0.512); both had significantly higher CNRscar-myo compared with the T1 ρ (42.6 ± 16.9 P = 0.007 and P = 0.014, respectively). No significant difference in scar size between LGE methods: MN (2.28 ± 1.58 g) BN (2.16 ± 1.57 g) and T1 ρ (2.29 ± 2.5 g). Confidence scores were significantly higher for BN (3.87 ± 0.346) compared with MN (3.1 ± 0.76 P < 0.001) and T1 ρ (3.20 ± 0.71 P < 0.001). DATA CONCLUSION: PSIR with inversion time (TI) set for blood nulling and the T1 ρ LGE sequence demonstrated significantly higher scar to blood CNR compared with routine MN. PSIR with TI set for blood nulling demonstrated significantly higher reader confidence scores compared with routine MN and T1 ρ LGE, suggesting routine adoption of a BN PSIR approach might be appropriate for LGE imaging. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018.