1. Evaluation of Implants Coated With Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 and Vacuum-Dried Using the Critical-Size Supraalveolar Peri-Implant Defect Model in Dogs
- Author
-
John F. Decker, John M. Wozney, Giuseppe Polimeni, Jan Hall, Carlo Alberto Cortella, Jaebum Lee, Ulf M.E. Wikesjö, Cristiano Susin, and Michael D. Rohrer
- Subjects
Male ,Vacuum ,Bone density ,Surface Properties ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Alveolar Bone Loss ,Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 ,Dentistry ,Mandible ,Bone morphogenetic protein 2 ,Osseointegration ,Bone remodeling ,Dogs ,Coated Materials, Biocompatible ,Bone Density ,Osteogenesis ,Transforming Growth Factor beta ,Immersion ,Alveolar Process ,medicine ,Animals ,Humans ,Mandibular Diseases ,Desiccation ,Tooth Socket ,Dental implant ,Dental alveolus ,Dental Implants ,Titanium ,business.industry ,Alveolar process ,Dental Implantation, Endosseous ,Recombinant Proteins ,Radiography ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Dental Prosthesis Design ,Bone Morphogenetic Proteins ,Periodontics ,Bone Remodeling ,Implant ,business - Abstract
Endosseous implants coated with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) in a laboratory bench setting and air-dried induce relevant bone formation but also resident bone remodeling. Thus, the objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of implants fully or partially coated with rhBMP-2 and vacuum-dried using an industrial process on local bone formation and resident bone remodeling.Twelve male adult Hound Labrador mongrel dogs were used. Critical-size, supraalveolar, peri-implant defects received titanium porous oxide surface implants coated in their most coronal aspect with rhBMP-2 (coronal-load, six animals), or by immersion of the entire implant in a rhBMP-2 solution (soak-load, six animals) for a total of 30 μg rhBMP-2 per implant. All implants were vacuum-dried. The animals were sacrificed at 8 weeks for histometric evaluation.Clinical healing was unremarkable. Bone formation was not significantly affected by the rhBMP-2 application protocol. New bone height and area averaged (± SE) 3.2 ± 0.5 versus 3.6 ± 0.3 mm, and 2.3 ± 0.5 versus 2.6 ± 0.8 mm(2) for coronal-load and soak-load implants, respectively (P0.05). The corresponding bone density and bone-implant contact registrations averaged 46.7% ± 5.8% versus 31.6% ± 4.4%, and 28% ± 5.6% versus 36.9% ± 3.4% (P0.05). In contrast, resident bone remodeling was significantly influenced by the rhBMP-2 application protocol. Peri-implant bone density averaged 72.2% ± 2.1% for coronal-load versus 60.6% ± 4.7% for soak-load implants (P0.05); the corresponding bone-implant contact averaged 70.7% ± 6.1% versus 47.2% ± 6.0% (P0.05).Local application of rhBMP-2 and vacuum-drying using industrial process seems to be a viable technology to manufacture implants that support local bone formation and osseointegration. Coronal-load implants obviate resident bone remodeling without compromising local bone formation.
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF