Osvaldo Massaiti Takayanagui, Daniel San-Juan, Matthew L. Romo, Jorge Moncayo, Jaime Fandiño, Graciela Cárdenas, Arturo Carpio, Ronaldo Abraham, Cleonísio Leite Rodrigues, Josemir W. Sander, Agnès Fleury, Juan Carlos Berrocal Duran, Marcos Serrano-Dueñas, Sander, Ley https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6041-9661, Romo, Matthew https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3038-0644, Carpio, Arturo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5821-6379, Serrano-Duenas, Marcos https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4496-6654, Sander, Ley/C-1576-2008, and Serrano-Duenas, Marcos/E-8845-2015
Made available in DSpace on 2019-09-12T16:53:23Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2016 Programa Iberoamericano de Ciencia y Tecnologia para el Desarrollo (CYTED) Department of Health's NIHR Biomedical Research Centres funding scheme Dr. Marvin Weil Epilepsy Research Fund ObjectiveThe diagnosis of neurocysticercosis (NCC) remains problematic because of the heterogeneity of its clinical, immunological, and imaging characteristics. Our aim was to develop and assess a new set of diagnostic criteria for NCC, which might allow for the accurate detection of, and differentiation between, parenchymal and extraparenchymal disease. MethodsA group of Latin American NCC experts developed by consensus a new set of diagnostic criteria for NCC. A multicenter, retrospective study was then conducted to validate it. The reference standard for diagnosis of active NCC was the disappearance or reduction of cysts after anthelmintic treatment. In total, three pairs of independent neurologists blinded to the diagnosis evaluated 93 cases (with NCC) and 93 controls (without NCC) using the new diagnostic criteria. Mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to estimate sensitivity and specificity. ResultsInter-rater reliability (kappa) of diagnosis among evaluators was 0.60. For diagnosis of NCC versus no NCC, the new criteria had a sensitivity of 93.2% and specificity of 81.4%. For parenchymal NCC, the new criteria had a sensitivity of 89.8% and specificity of 80.7% and for extraparenchymal NCC, the new criteria had a sensitivity of 65.9% and specificity of 94.9%. InterpretationThese criteria have acceptable reliability and validity and could be a new tool for clinicians and researchers. An advantage of the new criteria is that they consider parasite location (ie, parenchymal or extraparenchymal), which is an important factor determining the clinical, immunological, and radiological presentation of the disease, and importantly, its treatment and prognosis. Ann Neurol 2016;80:434-442 [Fleury, Agnes] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Invest Biomed, Insurgentes Sur 3877, Mexico City 14269, DF, Mexico [Carpio, Arturo; Romo, Matthew L.] Univ Cuenca, Fac Ciencias Med, Cuenca, Ecuador [Carpio, Arturo] Columbia Univ, GH Sergievsky Ctr, New York, NY USA [Fleury, Agnes; Cardenas, Graciela; San-Juan, Daniel] Secretaria Salud Mexico, Inst Nacl Neurol & Neurocirugia, Mexico City, DF, Mexico [Romo, Matthew L.] CUNY, Grad Sch Publ Hlth & Hlth Policy, New York, NY 10021 USA [Abraham, Ronaldo] Universidade de Taubaté (Unitau), Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil [Fandino, Jaime] FIRE, Fdn Ctr Colombiano Epilepsia & Enfermedade Neurol, Cartagena, Colombia [Duran, Juan C.] Hosp Clin, Unidad Neurol, La Paz, Bolivia [Moncayo, Jorge] Univ Int Ecuador, Escuela Med, Quito, Ecuador [Rodrigues, Cleonisio Leite] Hosp Geral, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil [Serrano-Duenas, Marcos] Pontificia Univ Catolica Ecuador, Hosp Carlos Andrade Marin, Fac Med, Serv Neurol,IESS, Quito, Ecuador [Takayanagui, Oswaldo] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil [Sander, Josemir W.] UCL, Inst Neurol, NIHR Univ Coll London Hosp, Biomed Res Ctr, London, England [Sander, Josemir W.] SEIN, Heemstede, Netherlands